Anonymous wrote:I don't think it's bad that he spends time with his mom, but it is a red flag that he needs reminders to groom himself.
if you marry him, you will be the one reminding him, and that will get old quick.
Anonymous wrote:How do you know a guy is a loser?
I’m dating a 29 year old who has a masters degree in a liberal arts field, has been consistently employed since he graduated and gets promoted every year even though he currently only makes 100k. He works a lot and seems capable in his profession.
The red flags that seem loserish to me:
- beholden to his mom. Must see family twice a week. It’s very hard for him to break engagements with them.
- his mom buys him clothes. He never shops for himself.
- she also texts him to remind him to get his hair cut and go to the dentist.
- his friends are so immature. Either underemployed or are just not ready to settle down at all. Approaching 30 and none of them are married.
- he doesn’t have any hobbies or passions outside his job. He plays video games and reads.
- eats poorly. Doesn’t excercise. Sleeps in till 1 pm on weekends.
Am I being too picky?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He's 29, FFS. If those things were the definition of loser, 90% of guys would be losers.
And this one has a job! And is decently paid! And doesn't live in his parents' basement!
Not a loser, OP. Maybe immature, but not a loser.
Wow. Since when did the bar drop so low that women should now be impressed with men who are employed? This is so sad. Glad my own (much higher) standards reflect my self-worth.
The question is not if you should be impressed. The question is "what makes a guy a loser?"
Hope your much higher standards can appropriately focus on finding someone who treats you well.
Yes, generally "high" relationship standards are built on the very basic assumption that you're being "treated well"...
Personally, I find a guy is a loser if he:
- Can't carry a conversation/ doesn't follow current events
- Doesn't travel/ have a passport
- Has no books at his apartment
- Doesn't own his own tux by 30-35 yrs old
- Doesn't invest
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He's 29, FFS. If those things were the definition of loser, 90% of guys would be losers.
And this one has a job! And is decently paid! And doesn't live in his parents' basement!
Not a loser, OP. Maybe immature, but not a loser.
Wow. Since when did the bar drop so low that women should now be impressed with men who are employed? This is so sad. Glad my own (much higher) standards reflect my self-worth.
The question is not if you should be impressed. The question is "what makes a guy a loser?"
Hope your much higher standards can appropriately focus on finding someone who treats you well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He's 29, FFS. If those things were the definition of loser, 90% of guys would be losers.
And this one has a job! And is decently paid! And doesn't live in his parents' basement!
Not a loser, OP. Maybe immature, but not a loser.
Wow. Since when did the bar drop so low that women should now be impressed with men who are employed? This is so sad. Glad my own (much higher) standards reflect my self-worth.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A guy that thinks he's fly, always talk' about what he wants, but just sits on his broke ass
Hanging out the passenger side, of his best friend's ride tryin to holler at me
Doesn't have a car, so he's walking
He lives at home with his Mama
Has a shorty, but doesn't show love
Wanna get with me with no money
His game is kinda week, can't get with a dead beat ass
+1, but that's a scrub.
This is a loser.
Anonymous wrote:I would not date someone who at 29 did not make doctors appointments and hair appointments on his own. Yikes. I also would not date someone who plays video games.