Anonymous wrote:Kind of sick of Meghan’s bare arms and skin tight dresses. She needs to learn to be a lady. It’s funny social climbing. She just doesn’t have that aristocratic air.

Scratch off your final three sentences and I agree with you.

I am a little sick of Meghan's bare arms and skin tight dresses, but she is a lady. She has that aristocratic air. But her clothing choices sometimes could be improved, which is why I am suggesting she not have picked that form-fitting, *white*, sleeveless dress --------- for an official family portrait for her FIL's 70th birthday. This type of occasion loudly calls out for a CLASSIC and SAFE wardrobe choice.

Anonymous wrote:Duchess Kate in March 2017 (still winter)

1) it's inside
2) it's a dark colored dress
3) it looks like some sort of a cocktail affair, judging by the high tables to the side in the photo

Duchess Kate in March 2017 (still winter)

Kind of sick of Meghan’s bare arms and skin tight dresses. She needs to learn to be a lady. It’s funny social climbing. She just doesn’t have that aristocratic air.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Adorable! But Kate's dress is not.

I actually like her dress better than Meghan's. The bare arms are distracting (to me) whereas the blue blends more with William's outfit.

I agree. I do not think that Meghan's dress "fits" with the color scheme and classic feel of the rest of the family/the photo.

I agree.

She should have worn navy.

So did she not get the color scheme memo or did she just refuse to abide by it, I wonder? Either way would make it seem like there are issues brewing.

I know. It doesn't look good, that's for sure. IF I were her friend or her mom, I'd glance at it and immediately be like, "What happened???"

Megan's dress does abide by the color scheme - its white (like Camilla's) with dark navy accents (closer to the color of William's suit than Harry's).

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Adorable! But Kate's dress is not.

I actually like her dress better than Meghan's. The bare arms are distracting (to me) whereas the blue blends more with William's outfit.

And it is November! Who does that?

The photos were taken in September.

For a November occasion. (NP here) So, no bare arms. Doesn't look right. It either looks "trying too hard" or like no one wanted to offend the new girl and politely tell her,"Errrm, that doesn't quite fit in with our family. Sorry."

Hmm. Here is her Majesty in February 1969

Still think this is more acceptable because:

1) it is inside
2) the color (white is a much more summery color than hot pink, which can be worn yearround)
3) the style of the dress is much more of a classic cut and less form-fitting

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Adorable! But Kate's dress is not.

I actually like her dress better than Meghan's. The bare arms are distracting (to me) whereas the blue blends more with William's outfit.

I agree. I do not think that Meghan's dress "fits" with the color scheme and classic feel of the rest of the family/the photo.

I agree.

She should have worn navy.

So did she not get the color scheme memo or did she just refuse to abide by it, I wonder? Either way would make it seem like there are issues brewing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Adorable! But Kate's dress is not.

I actually like her dress better than Meghan's. The bare arms are distracting (to me) whereas the blue blends more with William's outfit.

And it is November! Who does that?

The photos were taken in September.

For a November occasion. (NP here) So, no bare arms. Doesn't look right. It either looks "trying too hard" or like no one wanted to offend the new girl and politely tell her,"Errrm, that doesn't quite fit in with our family. Sorry."

Hmm. Here is her Majesty in February 1969

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Adorable! But Kate's dress is not.

I actually like her dress better than Meghan's. The bare arms are distracting (to me) whereas the blue blends more with William's outfit.

I agree. I do not think that Meghan's dress "fits" with the color scheme and classic feel of the rest of the family/the photo.

I agree.

She should have worn navy.

Anonymous wrote:Adorable! But Kate's dress is not.

Looks identical to dress worn by Meghan’s Suits castmast to her wedding.

I love it on Kate for this portrait. Not so much for a royal wedding,

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Adorable! But Kate's dress is not.

I actually like her dress better than Meghan's. The bare arms are distracting (to me) whereas the blue blends more with William's outfit.

I agree. I do not think that Meghan's dress "fits" with the color scheme and classic feel of the rest of the family/the photo.

I agree.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Adorable! But Kate's dress is not.

I actually like her dress better than Meghan's. The bare arms are distracting (to me) whereas the blue blends more with William's outfit.

Oh no! Meghan bare arms are exposing almost as much skin as Camilla's legs!

Quoted PP here. It's her arm against Harry's suit that stands out to me. Camilla's legs against the wooden bench blend in more.

Anonymous wrote:Kate’s dress is a little ridiculous. But she look lovely in the back holding Louis. Meghan looks great but clearly they were told the color of the day was blue. And she chose a white and black dress? Kate at least stuck to the rules.

Kate's dress is ridiculous if chosen to wear on her own. But for a family pic where you all just have to look classic, pulled-together, and in the color scheme, it's a win.

Kate’s dress is a little ridiculous. But she look lovely in the back holding Louis. Meghan looks great but clearly they were told the color of the day was blue. And she chose a white and black dress? Kate at least stuck to the rules.