Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I'm pretty sure there are things I we can all do differently. I'm employed (Associates degree RN) but it is still hard to make ends meet. People who work 40 hrs a week should be able to eat out. On top of not eating out, you're suggesting pressure cooker beans as if that is some sort of panacea to our issues?
Dining out, as in having someone prep your meal and serve it to you? Hate to break it to you, that's a luxury, not a right. No one is saying it's a panacea to life's problems. The OP gave a practical suggestion. At some point people who whine about these things need to realize that at the end of the day, whining gets you nowhere. Keeping your head down and being pragmatic about your situation is what help.
+1
$250K HHI here and eating out is a rare treat.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I had a degree, roommates and cooked at home when I was in my 20s. That was the 1990s. Not sure things are so very different now.
Housing and degrees are more expensive now.
Anonymous wrote:I had a degree, roommates and cooked at home when I was in my 20s. That was the 1990s. Not sure things are so very different now.
Anonymous wrote:I had a degree, roommates and cooked at home when I was in my 20s. That was the 1990s. Not sure things are so very different now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The stats seems to say that the current generation of young people will NOT do better (financially) than their parents. No eating out for you!
There is no reason for people to be compensated at comfortable or reasonable level. It would be nice, but why would employers pay one penny more than they absolutely have to? Seriously.
Exactly. Capitalism doesn’t mean fare wages. It means max profits are king. Companies bough back stock and increased ceo compensation in the last decade instead of increasing wages. And also got a lot more efficiency from their employees at the same time who worked harder to keep their jobs.
Anonymous wrote: I’m not sure if this is a economical problem or what. I just find that it was a bit ridiculous that I have gone to school for four years got a degree and a good field and still can’t afford the cost of living. Even getting a job is difficult. Like I said, I’m in a good field but all jobs wanted at least two years of experience which I didn’t have coming out of college. All I had were debts. Even now it’s very hard to make ends meet so I clean houses on the side and I also donate my blood for extra money.
I know that the Republicans want to go back to what they considered ideal times. But fiscally speaking, and those times it was a lot easier to support yourself an even a family on one salary. What do you see as the future for youth in this country who are going to need to support themselves one day?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: I’m not sure if this is a economical problem or what. I just find that it was a bit ridiculous that I have gone to school for four years got a degree and a good field and still can’t afford the cost of living. Even getting a job is difficult. Like I said, I’m in a good field but all jobs wanted at least two years of experience which I didn’t have coming out of college. All I had were debts. Even now it’s very hard to make ends meet so I clean houses on the side and I also donate my blood for extra money.
I know that the Republicans want to go back to what they considered ideal times. But fiscally speaking, and those times it was a lot easier to support yourself an even a family on one salary. What do you see as the future for youth in this country who are going to need to support themselves one day?
What "good" field are you in?
The "good old times" are a myth. Those were different times when expectations were different. Kids worked after school. Most people did not waste time in college and therefore no debt. People lived within their means, etc. It was also way before the same Republicans you talk about exported all those jobs to foreign countries.
Anonymous wrote:So is everyone supposed to live with roommates until they are 30 or married (which is really just another version of having a roommate/multiple income household).
Anonymous wrote:Quality of school matters. If you went to a top tier with excellent grades or a crappy school with low gpa. Any college degree is like an equivalent of a high school diploma.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I'm pretty sure there are things I we can all do differently. I'm employed (Associates degree RN) but it is still hard to make ends meet. People who work 40 hrs a week should be able to eat out. On top of not eating out, you're suggesting pressure cooker beans as if that is some sort of panacea to our issues?
Dining out, as in having someone prep your meal and serve it to you? Hate to break it to you, that's a luxury, not a right. No one is saying it's a panacea to life's problems. The OP gave a practical suggestion. At some point people who whine about these things need to realize that at the end of the day, whining gets you nowhere. Keeping your head down and being pragmatic about your situation is what help.
Anonymous wrote:Quality of school matters. If you went to a top tier with excellent grades or a crappy school with low gpa. Any college degree is like an equivalent of a high school diploma.
Anonymous wrote:Climb that ladder
I’m 32 making over 100k with no college education
Anonymous wrote: I’m not sure if this is a economical problem or what. I just find that it was a bit ridiculous that I have gone to school for four years got a degree and a good field and still can’t afford the cost of living. Even getting a job is difficult. Like I said, I’m in a good field but all jobs wanted at least two years of experience which I didn’t have coming out of college. All I had were debts. Even now it’s very hard to make ends meet so I clean houses on the side and I also donate my blood for extra money.
I know that the Republicans want to go back to what they considered ideal times. But fiscally speaking, and those times it was a lot easier to support yourself an even a family on one salary. What do you see as the future for youth in this country who are going to need to support themselves one day?
Anonymous wrote:So is everyone supposed to live with roommates until they are 30 or married (which is really just another version of having a roommate/multiple income household).