Anonymous
Post 03/23/2022 12:16     Subject: At the very least, Kim Davis lost

She just lost again.

Anonymous
Post 09/01/2019 11:47     Subject: At the very least, Kim Davis lost

Anonymous wrote:Page 1 of this thread is full of posts saying she is a loser, with no skills, and no money. Page 2 is celebrating the fact she can be held personally responsible. Ok, what are you going to get from her? Suing someone with no assets is pointless.



Having her turned out homeless from her used double wide will be worth it. Mobile homes are personal property and not protected by Homestead Act protections.
Anonymous
Post 09/01/2019 11:41     Subject: At the very least, Kim Davis lost

Page 1 of this thread is full of posts saying she is a loser, with no skills, and no money. Page 2 is celebrating the fact she can be held personally responsible. Ok, what are you going to get from her? Suing someone with no assets is pointless.
Anonymous
Post 08/26/2019 10:45     Subject: Re:At the very least, Kim Davis lost

Bigots just don’t understand the absurdity of having a woman who has been married four times and had two children out of wedlock as the protector of “the sanctity of marriage.”

“‘Til death is do part,” Kim.
Anonymous
Post 08/26/2019 10:25     Subject: At the very least, Kim Davis lost

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:6th Circuit unanimously rules that the couples to whom Davis denied marriage licenses can sue her personally.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-kentucky-weddings/kentucky-clerk-who-refused-same-sex-marriage-licenses-can-be-sued-idUSKCN1VD284

Oh this is good news. Thank you for posting, I needed a little pick up!

This gets overturned on appeal—plus her legal costs will be covered.

Enjoy your victory


While it lasts....


Did you not read or just not understand the article? This was the appeal.
Anonymous
Post 08/26/2019 09:50     Subject: At the very least, Kim Davis lost

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:6th Circuit unanimously rules that the couples to whom Davis denied marriage licenses can sue her personally.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-kentucky-weddings/kentucky-clerk-who-refused-same-sex-marriage-licenses-can-be-sued-idUSKCN1VD284

Oh this is good news. Thank you for posting, I needed a little pick up!

This gets overturned on appeal—plus her legal costs will be covered.

Enjoy your victory


While it lasts....
Anonymous
Post 08/26/2019 09:48     Subject: At the very least, Kim Davis lost

Anonymous wrote:Now gays from Massachusetts and California don't have to travel a thousand miles or more to an obscure county in Kentucky they'd never otherwise go to to get denied a marriage license.

It's truly a victory for civil rights.

Post of the week!
Well said!
Anonymous
Post 08/25/2019 14:42     Subject: At the very least, Kim Davis lost

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Now gays from Massachusetts and California don't have to travel a thousand miles or more to an obscure county in Kentucky they'd never otherwise go to to get denied a marriage license.

It's truly a victory for civil rights.


Aren't you clever? (Aren't is actually the answer.)



Yes, I'm in fact extremely clever.

Thank you for pointing that out to the .... less appreciative people here.



Wow, Sweetie, that went right over your head. You poor old soul... Tough night for you, huh?


Pot, meet kettle


You don't understand what "pot, meet kettle" means.
Anonymous
Post 08/25/2019 14:39     Subject: At the very least, Kim Davis lost

Anonymous wrote:Now gays from Massachusetts and California don't have to travel a thousand miles or more to an obscure county in Kentucky they'd never otherwise go to to get denied a marriage license.

It's truly a victory for civil rights.


Come out already!
Anonymous
Post 08/25/2019 13:54     Subject: At the very least, Kim Davis lost

They should be able to sue mike huckabee also. Or she should. He encouraged the hell out of her.
Anonymous
Post 08/25/2019 13:36     Subject: At the very least, Kim Davis lost

Anonymous wrote:6th Circuit unanimously rules that the couples to whom Davis denied marriage licenses can sue her personally.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-kentucky-weddings/kentucky-clerk-who-refused-same-sex-marriage-licenses-can-be-sued-idUSKCN1VD284

Oh this is good news. Thank you for posting, I needed a little pick up!
Anonymous
Post 08/25/2019 13:29     Subject: At the very least, Kim Davis lost

6th Circuit unanimously rules that the couples to whom Davis denied marriage licenses can sue her personally.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-kentucky-weddings/kentucky-clerk-who-refused-same-sex-marriage-licenses-can-be-sued-idUSKCN1VD284
Anonymous
Post 11/07/2018 00:44     Subject: At the very least, Kim Davis lost

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Now gays from Massachusetts and California don't have to travel a thousand miles or more to an obscure county in Kentucky they'd never otherwise go to to get denied a marriage license.

It's truly a victory for civil rights.


Aren't you clever? (Aren't is actually the answer.)



Yes, I'm in fact extremely clever.

Thank you for pointing that out to the .... less appreciative people here.



Wow, Sweetie, that went right over your head. You poor old soul... Tough night for you, huh?


Pot, meet kettle
Anonymous
Post 11/06/2018 23:32     Subject: At the very least, Kim Davis lost

She lost to a gay man whom she refused to marry.
Anonymous
Post 11/06/2018 23:30     Subject: At the very least, Kim Davis lost

I’m from Rowan County. So happy to see her gone.