Anonymous wrote:If Asians are disciplined less than whites turn t means Asians are even more disproportionately less disciplined than whites are and blacks are disciplined even more in comparison to Asians than to whites yet the story completely omits it implying an anti black and anti Hispanic bias in the faculty and staff.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Also look at the title of the story. It says minority students more likely to get disciplined. Asians are the least likely to be disciplined even in their stats so are Asians not a minority?
The lede says "black and Hispanic students in Montgomery County schools are, on average, more than three grade levels behind white students academically, and more than twice as likely to be disciplined as white students." The HEADLINE says "Minority Students in MCPS More Likely To Be Disciplined, Behind Academically." This is a space issue, and Asians are kind of being erased by the headline writer. But the article is pretty clear that it is talking about black and Hispanic students, not all minority students.
I think the answer is that yes, Asians are a minority, but they are not the particular minority that this article is about. And that headline writers sometimes slightly misrepresent the meaning/content of the article in favor of using fewer words.
The entire story omits Asians skewing the conclusion
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Also look at the title of the story. It says minority students more likely to get disciplined. Asians are the least likely to be disciplined even in their stats so are Asians not a minority?
The lede says "black and Hispanic students in Montgomery County schools are, on average, more than three grade levels behind white students academically, and more than twice as likely to be disciplined as white students." The HEADLINE says "Minority Students in MCPS More Likely To Be Disciplined, Behind Academically." This is a space issue, and Asians are kind of being erased by the headline writer. But the article is pretty clear that it is talking about black and Hispanic students, not all minority students.
I think the answer is that yes, Asians are a minority, but they are not the particular minority that this article is about. And that headline writers sometimes slightly misrepresent the meaning/content of the article in favor of using fewer words.
The entire story omits Asians skewing the conclusion
Anonymous wrote:That was such a stupid study. They should have been looking into why the students are getting disciplined rather than what race they are. What is the MCPS supposed to do now, condone bad actions because they are black or hispanic?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Also look at the title of the story. It says minority students more likely to get disciplined. Asians are the least likely to be disciplined even in their stats so are Asians not a minority?
The lede says "black and Hispanic students in Montgomery County schools are, on average, more than three grade levels behind white students academically, and more than twice as likely to be disciplined as white students." The HEADLINE says "Minority Students in MCPS More Likely To Be Disciplined, Behind Academically." This is a space issue, and Asians are kind of being erased by the headline writer. But the article is pretty clear that it is talking about black and Hispanic students, not all minority students.
I think the answer is that yes, Asians are a minority, but they are not the particular minority that this article is about. And that headline writers sometimes slightly misrepresent the meaning/content of the article in favor of using fewer words.
The entire story omits Asians skewing the conclusion
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Also look at the title of the story. It says minority students more likely to get disciplined. Asians are the least likely to be disciplined even in their stats so are Asians not a minority?
The lede says "black and Hispanic students in Montgomery County schools are, on average, more than three grade levels behind white students academically, and more than twice as likely to be disciplined as white students." The HEADLINE says "Minority Students in MCPS More Likely To Be Disciplined, Behind Academically." This is a space issue, and Asians are kind of being erased by the headline writer. But the article is pretty clear that it is talking about black and Hispanic students, not all minority students.
I think the answer is that yes, Asians are a minority, but they are not the particular minority that this article is about. And that headline writers sometimes slightly misrepresent the meaning/content of the article in favor of using fewer words.
Anonymous wrote:Also look at the title of the story. It says minority students more likely to get disciplined. Asians are the least likely to be disciplined even in their stats so are Asians not a minority?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Also look at the title of the story. It says minority students more likely to get disciplined. Asians are the least likely to be disciplined even in their stats so are Asians not a minority?
Asians are not an underrepresented minority (URM).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Also look at the title of the story. It says minority students more likely to get disciplined. Asians are the least likely to be disciplined even in their stats so are Asians not a minority?
Asians are not an underrepresented minority (URM).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Also look at the title of the story. It says minority students more likely to get disciplined. Asians are the least likely to be disciplined even in their stats so are Asians not a minority?
Asians are not an underrepresented minority (URM).
Anonymous wrote:Also look at the title of the story. It says minority students more likely to get disciplined. Asians are the least likely to be disciplined even in their stats so are Asians not a minority?