Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:RantingSoccerDad wrote:Anonymous wrote:Also with FPYC. EDP is pretty much the only higher league you’d be able to get into, and if I’m not mistaken you have to have won your division.
That doesn't sound right. I've seen tons of teams go from NCSL Division 1 to EDP in one year.
It's funny in a way. All these teams decide they've outgrown NCSL, so they go to EDP -- to play each other anyway.
Sorry, I should’ve specified. This team was in Division 2, not 1.
You don't need to have won any division to enter EDP. NCSL and EDP are not in any hierarchy together.
Anonymous wrote:RantingSoccerDad wrote:Anonymous wrote:Also with FPYC. EDP is pretty much the only higher league you’d be able to get into, and if I’m not mistaken you have to have won your division.
That doesn't sound right. I've seen tons of teams go from NCSL Division 1 to EDP in one year.
It's funny in a way. All these teams decide they've outgrown NCSL, so they go to EDP -- to play each other anyway.
Sorry, I should’ve specified. This team was in Division 2, not 1.
RantingSoccerDad wrote:Anonymous wrote:Also with FPYC. EDP is pretty much the only higher league you’d be able to get into, and if I’m not mistaken you have to have won your division.
That doesn't sound right. I've seen tons of teams go from NCSL Division 1 to EDP in one year.
It's funny in a way. All these teams decide they've outgrown NCSL, so they go to EDP -- to play each other anyway.
FPYCparent wrote:Are the 08 girls regularly trouncing the opposition?
This particular U11 team is in the 10-team NCSL second division for the fall season. 24 goals for, 3 against (one was an own goal). 5 wins with 3 regular season games remaining, so they're already guaranteed a winning season. But, again, this is a "decent" team going up against second/third teams from larger clubs. First division also has 10 teams, including some ?higher? teams from clubs also represented in the second division (McLean, GFR, for example).
The upcoming WAGS and Bethesda Premier tournaments will show if these girls are on track for a higher level of play.
Also bear in mind that the 2008s bore the brunt of the age grouping change from school year to birth year. Many/most of the FPYC 2008 girls were born in the second half of the year. Any girls born in the first half may have started training with the 2007s (a full year earlier than the 2008s), so some have technically been playing up once the rule change went into effect … with the same amount of experience as the 07s. Those girls just happen to now qualify to play as 2008s as well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thinking of NCSL blowouts...NCSL needs to look at teams from clubs with DA when they become U12. For example, let's say Arlington...at U11 Arlington Red and White CCL, Blue team in NCSL and they do well. Now, the DA teams start at U12 and most of the Red and White kids go DA and that Blue team basically becomes the Red team, the Black team basically becomes the White team, and the Gold team basically becomes the Blue team but NCSL still puts the Blue team in Division 1 based on the name of the team and not the quality of the team. Maybe these DA clubs should communicate this to NCSL prior to the division structure being released. Maybe NCSL should realized it without being told. I don't know. This happened with PWSI last year and I think it's happening to Arlington Blue and Loudoun White this year. I just hate to see teams get blown out.
Shouldn’t the DA cast a wider net than a single team ? If DA was consolidating talent then you might see a couple players from Arlington red make DA, not the whole team. That’s a joke.
No it is not: Arlington, as all DAs, has two teams at the U12 level, which explains why many kids from the U11 Red team make it there.
FPYCparent wrote:
And then there are "NCSL-only/NCSL-heavy" clubs like FPYC that only field one team per age group (OK, there a handful of exceptions where the club actually fields two or even three teams in a specific age group). While I can't speak for all teams in the club, I want to believe my DD's team is on the decent/strong side for this U11 year. However, we've only been scheduled against the second/third teams of larger clubs like Loudoun, SAC, and McLean. For now, we really just have to wait another season or three for the promotion/relegation process to place us in the most appropriate division. (The girls may get to see how good they can be @ WAGS this weekend, going up against Barca Academy Red, Arlington White, and a western PA squad.)
I don't think there are any serious plans for FPYC to move wholesale to CCL or NPL/VPL, etc., regardless of how competitive some of its teams might be. Our particular coach may have started looking at EDP just for my DD's team, but even that decision may not be made any time soon. From what I think I understand, EDP could be this team's lone option for moving up (beyond NCSL, that is). I can see a few other "small-but-competitive" clubs finding themselves in the same situation.
FPYCparent wrote:
And then there are "NCSL-only/NCSL-heavy" clubs like FPYC that only field one team per age group (OK, there a handful of exceptions where the club actually fields two or even three teams in a specific age group). While I can't speak for all teams in the club, I want to believe my DD's team is on the decent/strong side for this U11 year. However, we've only been scheduled against the second/third teams of larger clubs like Loudoun, SAC, and McLean. For now, we really just have to wait another season or three for the promotion/relegation process to place us in the most appropriate division. (The girls may get to see how good they can be @ WAGS this weekend, going up against Barca Academy Red, Arlington White, and a western PA squad.)
I don't think there are any serious plans for FPYC to move wholesale to CCL or NPL/VPL, etc., regardless of how competitive some of its teams might be. Our particular coach may have started looking at EDP just for my DD's team, but even that decision may not be made any time soon. From what I think I understand, EDP could be this team's lone option for moving up (beyond NCSL, that is). I can see a few other "small-but-competitive" clubs finding themselves in the same situation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thinking of NCSL blowouts...NCSL needs to look at teams from clubs with DA when they become U12. For example, let's say Arlington...at U11 Arlington Red and White CCL, Blue team in NCSL and they do well. Now, the DA teams start at U12 and most of the Red and White kids go DA and that Blue team basically becomes the Red team, the Black team basically becomes the White team, and the Gold team basically becomes the Blue team but NCSL still puts the Blue team in Division 1 based on the name of the team and not the quality of the team. Maybe these DA clubs should communicate this to NCSL prior to the division structure being released. Maybe NCSL should realized it without being told. I don't know. This happened with PWSI last year and I think it's happening to Arlington Blue and Loudoun White this year. I just hate to see teams get blown out.
Shouldn’t the DA cast a wider net than a single team ? If DA was consolidating talent then you might see a couple players from Arlington red make DA, not the whole team. That’s a joke.
Anonymous wrote:Thinking of NCSL blowouts...NCSL needs to look at teams from clubs with DA when they become U12. For example, let's say Arlington...at U11 Arlington Red and White CCL, Blue team in NCSL and they do well. Now, the DA teams start at U12 and most of the Red and White kids go DA and that Blue team basically becomes the Red team, the Black team basically becomes the White team, and the Gold team basically becomes the Blue team but NCSL still puts the Blue team in Division 1 based on the name of the team and not the quality of the team. Maybe these DA clubs should communicate this to NCSL prior to the division structure being released. Maybe NCSL should realized it without being told. I don't know. This happened with PWSI last year and I think it's happening to Arlington Blue and Loudoun White this year. I just hate to see teams get blown out.
Anonymous wrote:Thinking of NCSL blowouts...NCSL needs to look at teams from clubs with DA when they become U12. For example, let's say Arlington...at U11 Arlington Red and White CCL, Blue team in NCSL and they do well. Now, the DA teams start at U12 and most of the Red and White kids go DA and that Blue team basically becomes the Red team, the Black team basically becomes the White team, and the Gold team basically becomes the Blue team but NCSL still puts the Blue team in Division 1 based on the name of the team and not the quality of the team. Maybe these DA clubs should communicate this to NCSL prior to the division structure being released. Maybe NCSL should realized it without being told. I don't know. This happened with PWSI last year and I think it's happening to Arlington Blue and Loudoun White this year. I just hate to see teams get blown out.
Anonymous wrote:No perfect system. CCL Club v Club, NCSL/ODSL allows for independents and lower level clubs, NPL/VPL tries club v club. Just one of those things that isn't going to be perfect for everyone, I'm sure the open system idiot will chime in.