Anonymous wrote:Wasn't he in the sixth grade? She is absolutely a pedophile. She is only a victim of her sorry self. He is still being abused. Poor children. I hope someone is keeping an eye on them.

He was in second grade when she began to groom him, giving him private piano lessons, I think.

She's a monster.

Just because a teen boy has an erection does not mean he is not a victim. These women were in a position of power over the boys (they are not men). I can't believe you'd excuse women, but then think that men who go after teen girls are sexual predators. Adults having sex with minors makes you a predator. Period. Especially teachers who are there to guide, protect, and teach.

Shame on you for giving women a pass. She was not a victim.

Anonymous wrote:No one should be giving these women air or print time. She is a sexual predator. Full stop.

Absolutely. What's worse, he's still with his victimizer, all these years later. It makes me physically ill.

Wasn't he in the sixth grade? She is absolutely a pedophile. She is only a victim of her sorry self. He is still being abused. Poor children. I hope someone is keeping an eye on them.

He was 12. Not even a teenager. Not a high school kid. 12.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She may not be the victim from the strictly legal perspective, but she was definitely victimized.

She is a pedophile predator wrapped in the package of a feminine woman. You see a girl so you must think that this was somehow not her fault?

Are you able to convince yourself that her male victim is now victimizing her? Serious question.

I think she's victimized by the process, by the tabloid media, and yes, even to some extent by her "victim", yes.

The young man was only a victim in the strictest legal sense of the word. He was a minor. He certainly didn't act like a victim, he was a willing partner in the relationship. The only thing that made him a "victim" was the law.

Would a man in the same circumstances be a victim? No. He'd be a sexual predator. Because men and women are different. Period. That's reality.

So I can come over and have sex with your middle schlooler is what you’re saying?

Assuming you're relatively attractive and fit/in shape, my 11th grader would almost certainly be sexually attracted to you. As would most of his friends. If you offered him the opportunity, I'm certain he would have sex with you. Have you ever had a teenage son? They're literally walking erections. It's simple biology.

Would I approve of him having sex with you? Not really, because I'd like to see him with someone his own age. But I wouldn't think for a minute that he'd pass up an opportunity to have sex with you if it presented. Boys are just that way. For them, it's just another form of masturbation.

Not excusing her behavior but she seems to have had some very odd parents -- John Birch society Congressman dad, always seemed like there was some abuse going on in that home as well.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She may not be the victim from the strictly legal perspective, but she was definitely victimized.

She is a pedophile predator wrapped in the package of a feminine woman. You see a girl so you must think that this was somehow not her fault?

Are you able to convince yourself that her male victim is now victimizing her? Serious question.

I think she's victimized by the process, by the tabloid media, and yes, even to some extent by her "victim", yes.

The young man was only a victim in the strictest legal sense of the word. He was a minor. He certainly didn't act like a victim, he was a willing partner in the relationship. The only thing that made him a "victim" was the law.

Would a man in the same circumstances be a victim? No. He'd be a sexual predator. Because men and women are different. Period. That's reality.

So I can come over and have sex with your middle schlooler is what you’re saying?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She may not be the victim from the strictly legal perspective, but she was definitely victimized.

She is a pedophile predator wrapped in the package of a feminine woman. You see a girl so you must think that this was somehow not her fault?

Are you able to convince yourself that her male victim is now victimizing her? Serious question.

I think she's victimized by the process, by the tabloid media, and yes, even to some extent by her "victim", yes.

The young man was only a victim in the strictest legal sense of the word. He was a minor. He certainly didn't act like a victim, he was a willing partner in the relationship. The only thing that made him a "victim" was the law.

Would a man in the same circumstances be a victim? No. He'd be a sexual predator. Because men and women are different. Period. That's reality.

Anonymous wrote:She may not be the victim from the strictly legal perspective, but she was definitely victimized.

She is a pedophile predator wrapped in the package of a feminine woman. You see a girl so you must think that this was somehow not her fault?

Are you able to convince yourself that her male victim is now victimizing her? Serious question.

She may not be the victim from the strictly legal perspective, but she was definitely victimized.

Anonymous wrote:This story is so dead in the water.

But it's not over. She's out and she continues to victimize her victim.

This woman is missing a lot of screws in her head.

So gross. Is she on a sex offender registry?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one should be giving these women air or print time. She is a sexual predator. Full stop.

It's important to know that female predators exist, too.

Not like this. Give me an interview of her in a prison jumpsuit while serving 30 years.

Notice she only gave interviews after she got out. Her wedding special was especially disgusting.

She remains 100% remorseless and thinks she did nothing wrong.

Her victim in the meantime is still caught up with her. She's gas lighting him in the most sick way imaginable. Blaming him for relentlessly pursuing her when he was just a 12 year old kid.

She's a menace and a nightmare. And a pedophile.

Yes to all of this.