Anonymous wrote:This is a company that has bible verse numbers written in tiny letters on the bottom of their cups (John 3:16) the folds of the burger wrappers (Revelations 3:20 / Proverbs 26: ? - not sure the exact verse), and their french fry holders. They are a family owned business and make no secret of their faith or views. They serve fresh food and treat their employees well. They are one of the few fast food companies that someone can start off a making fries at a good hourly wage for an entry job, stay at in and out and get promoted all the way to manager and make over 100,000 a year.

Anonymous wrote:Silly Dems are silly

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats throw odd tantrums when they don't get all the money/attention.

They really want In and Out to only fund them? Why? What makes them the boss of In and Out?

TIme boycott and hurt the employees! Perfect!

I don't agree with this boycott, but if you were fine with GA taking away Delta's tax cuts because they cut ties with the NRA, or Trump telling Americans to boycott Harley, then you are a hypocrite.

It's one thing for an average joe to encourage boycotting a company for political reasons, but it's another thing entirely for a POTUS to do so. That's a bigger deal than this In/Out boycott. It's also a big deal that POTUS is telling the public that the free press is the enemy of the people simply because he doesn't like what they say about him.

Focus on bigger things, like all the corruption in the WH.

Dems want only to receive in and outs money. They aren’t boycotting for some great moral purpose.

? I don't see where it shows that Dems are boycotting just for the money. As the article states, IN/Out have given to both sides of the party, so not sure how their boycotting would stop In/Out from continuing to give to Rs as they have in the past. Your post makes zero sense.

Like I said, I think this boycott is ridiculous given that In/Out have been giving to both sides for years.

Ok so what is the boycott for? What is the issue?

Anonymous wrote:Just drove past the usually packed In and Out Burger by UCLA - it looked deserted!

I doubt it will hold but it will hurt. Why give a penny to the Republicans when your biggest market is California?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats throw odd tantrums when they don't get all the money/attention.

They really want In and Out to only fund them? Why? What makes them the boss of In and Out?

TIme boycott and hurt the employees! Perfect!

I don't agree with this boycott, but if you were fine with GA taking away Delta's tax cuts because they cut ties with the NRA, or Trump telling Americans to boycott Harley, then you are a hypocrite.

It's one thing for an average joe to encourage boycotting a company for political reasons, but it's another thing entirely for a POTUS to do so. That's a bigger deal than this In/Out boycott. It's also a big deal that POTUS is telling the public that the free press is the enemy of the people simply because he doesn't like what they say about him.

Focus on bigger things, like all the corruption in the WH.

Dems want only to receive in and outs money. They aren’t boycotting for some great moral purpose.

? I don't see where it shows that Dems are boycotting just for the money. As the article states, IN/Out have given to both sides of the party, so not sure how their boycotting would stop In/Out from continuing to give to Rs as they have in the past. Your post makes zero sense.

Like I said, I think this boycott is ridiculous given that In/Out have been giving to both sides for years.

Ok so what is the boycott for? What is the issue?

The issue is that they donated money to both the Democrats and the Republicans. Some Liberals are demanding they give only to Democrats, or else.....they won't buy their burgers.

It seems like they are trying to extort money from them- if there’s no “issue” othe than that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats throw odd tantrums when they don't get all the money/attention.

They really want In and Out to only fund them? Why? What makes them the boss of In and Out?

TIme boycott and hurt the employees! Perfect!

I don't agree with this boycott, but if you were fine with GA taking away Delta's tax cuts because they cut ties with the NRA, or Trump telling Americans to boycott Harley, then you are a hypocrite.

It's one thing for an average joe to encourage boycotting a company for political reasons, but it's another thing entirely for a POTUS to do so. That's a bigger deal than this In/Out boycott. It's also a big deal that POTUS is telling the public that the free press is the enemy of the people simply because he doesn't like what they say about him.

Focus on bigger things, like all the corruption in the WH.

Dems want only to receive in and outs money. They aren’t boycotting for some great moral purpose.

? I don't see where it shows that Dems are boycotting just for the money. As the article states, IN/Out have given to both sides of the party, so not sure how their boycotting would stop In/Out from continuing to give to Rs as they have in the past. Your post makes zero sense.

Like I said, I think this boycott is ridiculous given that In/Out have been giving to both sides for years.

Ok so what is the boycott for? What is the issue?

The issue is that they donated money to both the Democrats and the Republicans. Liberals are demanding they give only to Democrats, or else.....they won't buy their burgers.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats throw odd tantrums when they don't get all the money/attention.

They really want In and Out to only fund them? Why? What makes them the boss of In and Out?

TIme boycott and hurt the employees! Perfect!

I don't agree with this boycott, but if you were fine with GA taking away Delta's tax cuts because they cut ties with the NRA, or Trump telling Americans to boycott Harley, then you are a hypocrite.

It's one thing for an average joe to encourage boycotting a company for political reasons, but it's another thing entirely for a POTUS to do so. That's a bigger deal than this In/Out boycott. It's also a big deal that POTUS is telling the public that the free press is the enemy of the people simply because he doesn't like what they say about him.

Focus on bigger things, like all the corruption in the WH.

Dems want only to receive in and outs money. They aren’t boycotting for some great moral purpose.

? I don't see where it shows that Dems are boycotting just for the money. As the article states, IN/Out have given to both sides of the party, so not sure how their boycotting would stop In/Out from continuing to give to Rs as they have in the past. Your post makes zero sense.

Like I said, I think this boycott is ridiculous given that In/Out have been giving to both sides for years.

Ok so what is the boycott for? What is the issue?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats throw odd tantrums when they don't get all the money/attention.

They really want In and Out to only fund them? Why? What makes them the boss of In and Out?

TIme boycott and hurt the employees! Perfect!

I don't agree with this boycott, but if you were fine with GA taking away Delta's tax cuts because they cut ties with the NRA, or Trump telling Americans to boycott Harley, then you are a hypocrite.

It's one thing for an average joe to encourage boycotting a company for political reasons, but it's another thing entirely for a POTUS to do so. That's a bigger deal than this In/Out boycott. It's also a big deal that POTUS is telling the public that the free press is the enemy of the people simply because he doesn't like what they say about him.

Focus on bigger things, like all the corruption in the WH.

Dems want only to receive in and outs money. They aren’t boycotting for some great moral purpose.

? I don't see where it shows that Dems are boycotting just for the money. As the article states, IN/Out have given to both sides of the party, so not sure how their boycotting would stop In/Out from continuing to give to Rs as they have in the past. Your post makes zero sense.

Like I said, I think this boycott is ridiculous given that In/Out have been giving to both sides for years.

Anonymous wrote:Hey, republicans breathe, you folks should boycott that too!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:soon these democrats with boycott the Earth, looking for another planet...that is how unhinged they are

Your lips to God's ears!!!!!

Wouldn't that be great? If they just hated regular people so much they just left the friggin PLANET?!?!


One day, hopefully. If they don't try and put us in concentration camps first.

Anonymous wrote:soon these democrats with boycott the Earth, looking for another planet...that is how unhinged they are