Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I've seen a few kids who were amazing swim up but generally they stay in their age group in less the team has no other swimmers. Is this a small team? I agree with what the coach said. Times are more important than winning but winning is fun for kids.
Op Here. There's about 40 kids on the team. Generally about 20 show up at meets. DD's time for the 25yd free won gold in 9-10 age group. Same time in 11-12 would have put her in 10th place. She wouldn't have thought that was fun. lol
I didn't realize some leagues swim 25 free after age 8.
+1, here, you only swim 25 until you are turn 9. You must not be in this area. Summer team is over. 40 is a small team. Our summer team wasI forget, maybe over 225 kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I've seen a few kids who were amazing swim up but generally they stay in their age group in less the team has no other swimmers. Is this a small team? I agree with what the coach said. Times are more important than winning but winning is fun for kids.
Op Here. There's about 40 kids on the team. Generally about 20 show up at meets. DD's time for the 25yd free won gold in 9-10 age group. Same time in 11-12 would have put her in 10th place. She wouldn't have thought that was fun. lol
I didn't realize some leagues swim 25 free after age 8.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bizarre. It’s the other parents who are pathetic, and jealous to boot. They should take it up with coaches if they have a problem, not bad mouth swimmers and other parents over a rule that they question and don’t seem to understand. I’ve never heard of such rules, btw. In my kid’s summer league kids swim with their age group, period, although I suppose they would be allowed to swim up. The only age related rule that is controversial is kids who age up after June 1 get to continue swimming with the group they just aged out of.
This is not controversial. For summer swim, the age of the child on June 1 dictates what age group the child swims in. The child does not "age out" of a group if his birthday is on June 2. The child is validly swimming in the age group in which he belongs based on his age on June 1. Summer leagues elect to do it this way, versus winter swim where a child "ages up" on his birthday. It benefits some kids, as does any calendar day cutoff for any sport. That doesn't make it controversial or unfair.
Anonymous wrote:What a weird swim league.
This.
What a weird swim league.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I've seen a few kids who were amazing swim up but generally they stay in their age group in less the team has no other swimmers. Is this a small team? I agree with what the coach said. Times are more important than winning but winning is fun for kids.
Op Here. There's about 40 kids on the team. Generally about 20 show up at meets. DD's time for the 25yd free won gold in 9-10 age group. Same time in 11-12 would have put her in 10th place. She wouldn't have thought that was fun. lol
I didn't realize some leagues swim 25 free after age 8.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I've seen a few kids who were amazing swim up but generally they stay in their age group in less the team has no other swimmers. Is this a small team? I agree with what the coach said. Times are more important than winning but winning is fun for kids.
Op Here. There's about 40 kids on the team. Generally about 20 show up at meets. DD's time for the 25yd free won gold in 9-10 age group. Same time in 11-12 would have put her in 10th place. She wouldn't have thought that was fun. lol
Anonymous wrote:I've seen a few kids who were amazing swim up but generally they stay in their age group in less the team has no other swimmers. Is this a small team? I agree with what the coach said. Times are more important than winning but winning is fun for kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That is a very odd rule. The assumption is that club swimmers have an advantage, but that is not universally true. My youngest used to swim winter club because his physical therapist recommends it. He tries his best, but it would be cruel to have him swim up an age group.
OP here... I totally agree. When the incident happened last weekend, it caused a ripple effect because then they were questioning the placements of other club swimmers on our team. The next child to race was a 11 year old club swimmer. They pulled her out also and said she should be swimming 13-15. The coach argued it and the kid and my daughter ended up swimming alone just to get times, and were put back into their respective age groups. The 11 year old girl, despite being a club swimmer, did not place top 10 for anything in the 11-12 category.
Just because they swim all year doesn't necessarily mean they are better.
Anonymous wrote:That is a very odd rule. The assumption is that club swimmers have an advantage, but that is not universally true. My youngest used to swim winter club because his physical therapist recommends it. He tries his best, but it would be cruel to have him swim up an age group.