Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thanks for posting the link. So, her platform is more social workers and psychologists. What could go wrong?
+10000
Where are the additional SROs already? More social workers and psychologists? For what? Stop with trying to be all to all people, FCPS. It’s SCHOOL already and it’s already run on a shoestring budget!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thanks for posting the link. So, her platform is more social workers and psychologists. What could go wrong?
+10000
Where are the additional SROs already? More social workers and psychologists? For what? Stop with trying to be all to all people, FCPS. It’s SCHOOL already and it’s already run on a shoestring budget!
It’s not a shoestring budget at all but it would be bigger but for the likes of Schultz and her Tea Party friends.
Exactly! We live in one of the richest counties in the country. Our schools shouldn't be run on a shoestring budget at all. Let's advocate for more funding so that the kids with the big needs can be served. Do you like the idea that kids who need psychological help and interventions can't get it from our overworked and overstretched mental health professionals? I don't! The schools only have the resources and time to focus on disciplinary actions and not interventions. It simply exacerbates the problem and doesn't provide a long term solution for at-risk students (including those who are potentially harmful to themselves or others).
No more funding. Kids with big needs can be served in another setting. Stop with fixing everyone.
Anonymous wrote:Makes no sense why parties are even involved in school issues. Let people run on whatever platform they espouse and parents or citizens can vote for whomever is best for them.
Anonymous wrote:Makes no sense why parties are even involved in school issues. Let people run on whatever platform they espouse and parents or citizens can vote for whomever is best for them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do any of these candidates actually care about education as in portrait of a graduate and the 3 R's? Go wherever you want to in the bathroom, but can we please get some people on the board who actually care about curriculum and teaching?
The obsession of the far right with bathrooms, and the false dichotomies they are always presenting (as if one can't care about both education and non-discrimination), are tiring.
Schultz chews up a lot of tremendous amount of air time, and accomplishes next to nothing. Springfield District residents should re-elect her if they want to remain isolated on the School Board. Otherwise, they need a new representative.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do any of these candidates actually care about education as in portrait of a graduate and the 3 R's? Go wherever you want to in the bathroom, but can we please get some people on the board who actually care about curriculum and teaching?
That would be Elizabeth Schultz. She has four boys and she’s plugged in closely.
Clearly you admire her. Other than having kids, can you point or any specific initiatives she’s led or supported? Ive only observed her to be an obstructionist.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do any of these candidates actually care about education as in portrait of a graduate and the 3 R's? Go wherever you want to in the bathroom, but can we please get some people on the board who actually care about curriculum and teaching?
The obsession of the far right with bathrooms, and the false dichotomies they are always presenting (as if one can't care about both education and non-discrimination), are tiring.
Schultz chews up a lot of tremendous amount of air time, and accomplishes next to nothing. Springfield District residents should re-elect her if they want to remain isolated on the School Board. Otherwise, they need a new representative.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do any of these candidates actually care about education as in portrait of a graduate and the 3 R's? Go wherever you want to in the bathroom, but can we please get some people on the board who actually care about curriculum and teaching?
That would be Elizabeth Schultz. She has four boys and she’s plugged in closely.
Anonymous wrote:Do any of these candidates actually care about education as in portrait of a graduate and the 3 R's? Go wherever you want to in the bathroom, but can we please get some people on the board who actually care about curriculum and teaching?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do any of these candidates actually care about education as in portrait of a graduate and the 3 R's? Go wherever you want to in the bathroom, but can we please get some people on the board who actually care about curriculum and teaching?
The obsession of the far right with bathrooms, and the false dichotomies they are always presenting (as if one can't care about both education and non-discrimination), are tiring.
Schultz chews up a lot of tremendous amount of air time, and accomplishes next to nothing. Springfield District residents should re-elect her if they want to remain isolated on the School Board. Otherwise, they need a new representative.
Anonymous wrote:Do any of these candidates actually care about education as in portrait of a graduate and the 3 R's? Go wherever you want to in the bathroom, but can we please get some people on the board who actually care about curriculum and teaching?