Anonymous wrote:It is a crap shoot even with pensions. Remember ENRON? Also, my grandparents lost their guaranteed health insurance when their former employer went bankrupt. It got worse over the years until getting private insurance was the better option even after Obamacare kicked in.
Of course I also had an elderly cousin who died a few years ago with a couple million in savings — no investment accounts — earned from municipal government pensions. He and his wife lived VERY frugally — as in their primary residence was a trailer they towed all over North America. (The original tiny house people!) Should the have enjoyed their money more? Sometimes I wonder.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Everyone on DCUM throws out huge numbers, so I might be an outlier.
I'm 60, earn $97k, and currently have $700,000 in savings, and think I'm in fine shape. By age 66, I will have my house paid off, and my spending will drop from $4500 a month to $3000. My SS will be $2400 a month, and I can easily make up the difference from the withdrawals on the $700k.
I really think people saying you need $2 and $3 milliom are exaggerating IF you have living expenses in the $3k - $4k range.
This is exactly right. The weirdest are the people who preach austerity to get to some huge savings number. After 25 years of austerity, what are you expecting to do with all that money?
Wife and I make $200,000 a year together. We net about $10,000 a month from our pay checks, of which $2,500 is our mortgage. We have 3 kids I assume I won't be paying for forever (HOPEFULLY). I would assume our non-house, non-kid living expenses are probably $5-6,000 a month including international travel. I'm a Federal employee and can retire at 57 with a pension of $4500 a month. Even if SS got cut to 75% of benefits that would be something like $4500 a month at age 70.
So if we pay off our mortgage that means we're pretty comfortable from age 70 on, even before any 401(k) savings. We actually recently cut our 401(k) contributions make to the level that gets matched, because we were doing too much saving for the future and didn't want to feel as poor and stressed in the present.
You have the benefit of lifelong fantastic healthcare coverage.
Wow that's a huge benefit - plus a defined pension. I wouldn't have any worries either.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Everyone on DCUM throws out huge numbers, so I might be an outlier.
I'm 60, earn $97k, and currently have $700,000 in savings, and think I'm in fine shape. By age 66, I will have my house paid off, and my spending will drop from $4500 a month to $3000. My SS will be $2400 a month, and I can easily make up the difference from the withdrawals on the $700k.
I really think people saying you need $2 and $3 milliom are exaggerating IF you have living expenses in the $3k - $4k range.
This is exactly right. The weirdest are the people who preach austerity to get to some huge savings number. After 25 years of austerity, what are you expecting to do with all that money?
Wife and I make $200,000 a year together. We net about $10,000 a month from our pay checks, of which $2,500 is our mortgage. We have 3 kids I assume I won't be paying for forever (HOPEFULLY). I would assume our non-house, non-kid living expenses are probably $5-6,000 a month including international travel. I'm a Federal employee and can retire at 57 with a pension of $4500 a month. Even if SS got cut to 75% of benefits that would be something like $4500 a month at age 70.
So if we pay off our mortgage that means we're pretty comfortable from age 70 on, even before any 401(k) savings. We actually recently cut our 401(k) contributions make to the level that gets matched, because we were doing too much saving for the future and didn't want to feel as poor and stressed in the present.
You have the benefit of lifelong fantastic healthcare coverage.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Everyone on DCUM throws out huge numbers, so I might be an outlier.
I'm 60, earn $97k, and currently have $700,000 in savings, and think I'm in fine shape. By age 66, I will have my house paid off, and my spending will drop from $4500 a month to $3000. My SS will be $2400 a month, and I can easily make up the difference from the withdrawals on the $700k.
I really think people saying you need $2 and $3 milliom are exaggerating IF you have living expenses in the $3k - $4k range.
Health insurance alone will be $3k $4K range in 15 years. For some of us. I'm not referring to you, I can tell you have your ducks in a row and are doing a fine job.
Medicare + Long Term Care Insurance takes care of that enough of the fear mongering
Anonymous wrote:
You have the benefit of lifelong fantastic healthcare coverage.
Anonymous wrote:It is difficult to say how much we will need. It all depends on healthcare costs. DH takes a medicine that used to cost $1k a month, and now is $1k a week due to the drug company increasing the cost. If Medicare doesn’t cover it , we need to cover it. In the current environment, we can’t rely on Medicare.
We take other medications, but they are all reasonably priced at the moment.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Everyone on DCUM throws out huge numbers, so I might be an outlier.
I'm 60, earn $97k, and currently have $700,000 in savings, and think I'm in fine shape. By age 66, I will have my house paid off, and my spending will drop from $4500 a month to $3000. My SS will be $2400 a month, and I can easily make up the difference from the withdrawals on the $700k.
I really think people saying you need $2 and $3 milliom are exaggerating IF you have living expenses in the $3k - $4k range.
This is exactly right. The weirdest are the people who preach austerity to get to some huge savings number. After 25 years of austerity, what are you expecting to do with all that money?
Wife and I make $200,000 a year together. We net about $10,000 a month from our pay checks, of which $2,500 is our mortgage. We have 3 kids I assume I won't be paying for forever (HOPEFULLY). I would assume our non-house, non-kid living expenses are probably $5-6,000 a month including international travel. I'm a Federal employee and can retire at 57 with a pension of $4500 a month. Even if SS got cut to 75% of benefits that would be something like $4500 a month at age 70.
So if we pay off our mortgage that means we're pretty comfortable from age 70 on, even before any 401(k) savings. We actually recently cut our 401(k) contributions make to the level that gets matched, because we were doing too much saving for the future and didn't want to feel as poor and stressed in the present.
Anonymous wrote:Everyone on DCUM throws out huge numbers, so I might be an outlier.
I'm 60, earn $97k, and currently have $700,000 in savings, and think I'm in fine shape. By age 66, I will have my house paid off, and my spending will drop from $4500 a month to $3000. My SS will be $2400 a month, and I can easily make up the difference from the withdrawals on the $700k.
I really think people saying you need $2 and $3 milliom are exaggerating IF you have living expenses in the $3k - $4k range.
Anonymous wrote:Late 40s.
Planning for the following:
Retirement at age 67.
$50K pension income
$40K combined SS
$1.5 million retirement savings = approx. $60K/yr income
$600K - $800K home equity, which will be used to buy home outright in lower COLA area
This should produce roughly $150K income with no housing cost except for maintenance, insurance, and tax.
In addition, one or both of us may continue to work in part-time consulting position (both our careers are conducive to this).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Everyone on DCUM throws out huge numbers, so I might be an outlier.
I'm 60, earn $97k, and currently have $700,000 in savings, and think I'm in fine shape. By age 66, I will have my house paid off, and my spending will drop from $4500 a month to $3000. My SS will be $2400 a month, and I can easily make up the difference from the withdrawals on the $700k.
I really think people saying you need $2 and $3 milliom are exaggerating IF you have living expenses in the $3k - $4k range.
Health insurance alone will be $3k $4K range in 15 years. For some of us. I'm not referring to you, I can tell you have your ducks in a row and are doing a fine job.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Everyone on DCUM throws out huge numbers, so I might be an outlier.
I'm 60, earn $97k, and currently have $700,000 in savings, and think I'm in fine shape. By age 66, I will have my house paid off, and my spending will drop from $4500 a month to $3000. My SS will be $2400 a month, and I can easily make up the difference from the withdrawals on the $700k.
I really think people saying you need $2 and $3 milliom are exaggerating IF you have living expenses in the $3k - $4k range.
Health insurance alone will be $3k $4K range in 15 years. For some of us. I'm not referring to you, I can tell you have your ducks in a row and are doing a fine job.
Medicare + Long Term Care Insurance takes care of that enough of the fear mongering
Lol!! I'm paying $8,000/mo for my moms memory care. Most people don't carry long term care and many things change in terms of what is actually needed when the time comes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Everyone on DCUM throws out huge numbers, so I might be an outlier.
I'm 60, earn $97k, and currently have $700,000 in savings, and think I'm in fine shape. By age 66, I will have my house paid off, and my spending will drop from $4500 a month to $3000. My SS will be $2400 a month, and I can easily make up the difference from the withdrawals on the $700k.
I really think people saying you need $2 and $3 milliom are exaggerating IF you have living expenses in the $3k - $4k range.
Health insurance alone will be $3k $4K range in 15 years. For some of us. I'm not referring to you, I can tell you have your ducks in a row and are doing a fine job.
Medicare + Long Term Care Insurance takes care of that enough of the fear mongering