Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If DH and I each have a revocable trust set up, then if one of dies does that person's revocable trust turn into an irrevocable trust at that point?
More specifically, as is all of his goes to me, and all of mine goes to him. But after that, do all of his assets that come to me, are they then subject to the rest of his trust heirs that comes after me (and vice versa for him)? Or once each of our assets go to the other can they do what they want with them at that point?
*if one of dies does that person's revocable trust turn into an irrevocable trust at that point?* - No.
A trust has the following:
Grantor - The one who creates the trust (in this case your husband).
Trustee - Typically your husband, after his death you, others (your sister, his brother, etc.) after you.
Beneficiary(ies) - Folks that get the grantor's assets after his death.
Typically, your DH would name you as the first Trustee after him as well as the primary beneficiary after you. You'd do the same. This way, if he dies first, you become the trustee of his trust and transfer his assets to his primary beneficiary - you. If he names multiple beneficiaries, you'd deal with it accordingly.
The nature of the trust (irrevocable vs revocable) remains the same. A simple irrevocable trust would end after its primary purpose has been satisfied (e.g. assets have been transferred over to beneficiaries). You could set things up such that the trust can create irrevocable trusts on the grantor's death. e.g. DH dies with $3M. His death triggers the creation of 3 irreovocable trusts - one for each of you and your two kids (for example), each with $1M with a stipulation that you cannot withdraw more than 4% from the trust each year until your kids reach a certain age (for example).
Thank you for taking the time to answer this. And if I can impose a bit further..... So, my revocable trust names DH as my first beneficiary. After that, when he dies, then it goes to DC1 & DC2. My desire is that if I die he should have all the money and do with it as he pleases. I don't want him stuck with "my" second tier beneficiaries. (If that makes sense.) We were encouraged by our financial advisor to do this, and I agreed in case we both died at the same time. (We were traveling a lot at the time.) If, as soon as one of us dies, the remainder of the trust beneficiaries is void, then no problem. As expensive as this was to set up, I don't want to dive into a whole other expense if I'm concerned for no reason.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If DH and I each have a revocable trust set up, then if one of dies does that person's revocable trust turn into an irrevocable trust at that point?
More specifically, as is all of his goes to me, and all of mine goes to him. But after that, do all of his assets that come to me, are they then subject to the rest of his trust heirs that comes after me (and vice versa for him)? Or once each of our assets go to the other can they do what they want with them at that point?
*if one of dies does that person's revocable trust turn into an irrevocable trust at that point?* - No.
A trust has the following:
Grantor - The one who creates the trust (in this case your husband).
Trustee - Typically your husband, after his death you, others (your sister, his brother, etc.) after you.
Beneficiary(ies) - Folks that get the grantor's assets after his death.
Typically, your DH would name you as the first Trustee after him as well as the primary beneficiary after you. You'd do the same. This way, if he dies first, you become the trustee of his trust and transfer his assets to his primary beneficiary - you. If he names multiple beneficiaries, you'd deal with it accordingly.
The nature of the trust (irrevocable vs revocable) remains the same. A simple irrevocable trust would end after its primary purpose has been satisfied (e.g. assets have been transferred over to beneficiaries). You could set things up such that the trust can create irrevocable trusts on the grantor's death. e.g. DH dies with $3M. His death triggers the creation of 3 irreovocable trusts - one for each of you and your two kids (for example), each with $1M with a stipulation that you cannot withdraw more than 4% from the trust each year until your kids reach a certain age (for example).
Anonymous wrote:If DH and I each have a revocable trust set up, then if one of dies does that person's revocable trust turn into an irrevocable trust at that point?
More specifically, as is all of his goes to me, and all of mine goes to him. But after that, do all of his assets that come to me, are they then subject to the rest of his trust heirs that comes after me (and vice versa for him)? Or once each of our assets go to the other can they do what they want with them at that point?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No trusts, just wills and proper POD or beneficiaries on all eligible accounts.
Most people don't need trusts.
+1 And trusts can create problems where none would have existed if you did not have a trust. If you don't need a trust, don't get one. It's a money maker for lawyers and not always good for the heirs.
-signed a lawyer married to a lawyer who is about to strangle her FIL's estate and trust lawyer who never returns phone calls.
Anonymous wrote:If one has all of their beneficiaries properly designated, doesn't that avoid probrate?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No trusts, just wills and proper POD or beneficiaries on all eligible accounts.
Most people don't need trusts.
You do if you die and have minor children.
That is not true. Without a trust, the will goes through probate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No trusts, just wills and proper POD or beneficiaries on all eligible accounts.
Most people don't need trusts.
+1 And trusts can create problems where none would have existed if you did not have a trust. If you don't need a trust, don't get one. It's a money maker for lawyers and not always good for the heirs.
-signed a lawyer married to a lawyer who is about to strangle her FIL's estate and trust lawyer who never returns phone calls.
Anonymous wrote:I know this is old post, but why do you need a trust if you’re in CA? We live in VA but have assets that originate there (stocks).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It seems that avoiding probate is another issue we didn't talk about, and a living trust would do that. Would that be a reason to have one?
That's usually the #1 reason that attorneys will give you, but unless you have a particularly complicated estate, it is really not necessary. I've taken several estates through probate in different jurisdictions as an executor (and not an attorney), and it is really not that big of a deal. My legal fees for a local estate attorney were much less than what the deceased would have paid for establishing and maintaining trusts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No trusts, just wills and proper POD or beneficiaries on all eligible accounts.
Most people don't need trusts.
You do if you die and have minor children.
AFAIK, If you don't set up trusts, your children will get all their money when they turn 18. Our trust gives them a portion of the money when they hit a certain age. I'm not an expert - would someone who knows to comment on my statement.
Anonymous wrote:No trusts, just wills and proper POD or beneficiaries on all eligible accounts.
Most people don't need trusts.