Anonymous wrote:I'll go the other way, in favor of a rental property, based on data rather than the emotion (it's such a hassle dealing with tenants).
If you are earning 5-10% return a year on your rental property, then it's a good investment. That is a healthy return that is going to be consistent and may increase over time as rents increase. Keep in mind that returns are impacted when stuff breaks (roof, appliances, etc).
The money you put in the stock market will return somewhere between 5-10%. Here is something that I just googled: For the period 1950 to 2009, if you adjust the S&P 500 for inflation and account for dividends, the average annual return comes out to exactly 7.0%
The difference in having an investment property is that there is capital appreciation. In the right neighborhoods, there has been a ton of appreciation in the last 10 years.
Your tax treatment of a rental property is more favorable (e.g. depreciation), you get a leveraged return if you are borrowing from the bank (e.g. if the property increases by 5% a year, you get the full increase despite the fact that the bank loaned you 70% of the cost of the property), you learn business 101 basics (e.g. what to charge in rent, how valuable your time is vs your money, etc), in 30 years or less the property will be paid off by your tenant's money, the consistent returns will continue on regardless of your age and the property can be handed down to your kids, etc.
Lastly, if the stock market collapses, like it did in 2007, your stock portfolio will be significantly impacted. If the price of your real estate investment drops like it did in 2007, that does not mean that rents drop (it most instances).
Long story short, owning a property is a long term play with long term benefits. If you are in it to win it for the long term, then go with a rental property.
Anonymous wrote:I own a townhome that is rented out. We don't make any money on that property. It pays the mortgage but costs us a lot in repairs or in between tenants. We're going to have to replace the carpets & roof within the next few years. I constantly debate whether to sell the home and put the money from the sale in a mutual fund or a CD just so that it will actually make us money. We've been riding it out for the past 5 years hoping the housing market will go back up but it's been pretty stagnant where we live. I just don't see it appreciating enough to where we come out ahead. Maybe after the mortgage is paid off but that's in about 15 more years. And I can't help but to wonder if that money is just better off elsewhere.
Anonymous wrote:Is this a viable and sustainable option?
Currently 37yo (single income family) and have about $400k in retirement and $300k in home equity. My company invests 15% of my base salary into my retirement account each year from company profits. Also, I am provided dividends from company profits on a yearly basis (untouchable until I retire and usually around $50k to $100k, depending on company profits - this is not an investment account, money sits stagnant until I retire).
Should I stop my max contribution to my 401k ($18,500) and rely on company deposits for my retirement and purchase a rental property for supplemental income?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'll go the other way, in favor of a rental property, based on data rather than the emotion (it's such a hassle dealing with tenants).
If you are earning 5-10% return a year on your rental property, then it's a good investment. That is a healthy return that is going to be consistent and may increase over time as rents increase. Keep in mind that returns are impacted when stuff breaks (roof, appliances, etc).
The money you put in the stock market will return somewhere between 5-10%. Here is something that I just googled: For the period 1950 to 2009, if you adjust the S&P 500 for inflation and account for dividends, the average annual return comes out to exactly 7.0%
The difference in having an investment property is that there is capital appreciation. In the right neighborhoods, there has been a ton of appreciation in the last 10 years.
Your tax treatment of a rental property is more favorable (e.g. depreciation), you get a leveraged return if you are borrowing from the bank (e.g. if the property increases by 5% a year, you get the full increase despite the fact that the bank loaned you 70% of the cost of the property), you learn business 101 basics (e.g. what to charge in rent, how valuable your time is vs your money, etc), in 30 years or less the property will be paid off by your tenant's money, the consistent returns will continue on regardless of your age and the property can be handed down to your kids, etc.
Lastly, if the stock market collapses, like it did in 2007, your stock portfolio will be significantly impacted. If the price of your real estate investment drops like it did in 2007, that does not mean that rents drop (it most instances).
Long story short, owning a property is a long term play with long term benefits. If you are in it to win it for the long term, then go with a rental property.
I am different poster.
Thanks for the break down.
How do you calculate total return a year? Do you include property value appreciation in it?
Instead of writing out how I calculate it, here is a good overview: https://www.wikihow.com/Figure-Cap-Rate
You should figure out what the cap rate is before you even think about putting in an offer on an investment property.
Anonymous wrote:I don’t think it is a good idea, and also, are you sure that the company contribution isn’t a match? In most plans they don’t contribute the maximum unless you also contribute a certain amount.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'll go the other way, in favor of a rental property, based on data rather than the emotion (it's such a hassle dealing with tenants).
If you are earning 5-10% return a year on your rental property, then it's a good investment. That is a healthy return that is going to be consistent and may increase over time as rents increase. Keep in mind that returns are impacted when stuff breaks (roof, appliances, etc).
The money you put in the stock market will return somewhere between 5-10%. Here is something that I just googled: For the period 1950 to 2009, if you adjust the S&P 500 for inflation and account for dividends, the average annual return comes out to exactly 7.0%
The difference in having an investment property is that there is capital appreciation. In the right neighborhoods, there has been a ton of appreciation in the last 10 years.
Your tax treatment of a rental property is more favorable (e.g. depreciation), you get a leveraged return if you are borrowing from the bank (e.g. if the property increases by 5% a year, you get the full increase despite the fact that the bank loaned you 70% of the cost of the property), you learn business 101 basics (e.g. what to charge in rent, how valuable your time is vs your money, etc), in 30 years or less the property will be paid off by your tenant's money, the consistent returns will continue on regardless of your age and the property can be handed down to your kids, etc.
Lastly, if the stock market collapses, like it did in 2007, your stock portfolio will be significantly impacted. If the price of your real estate investment drops like it did in 2007, that does not mean that rents drop (it most instances).
Long story short, owning a property is a long term play with long term benefits. If you are in it to win it for the long term, then go with a rental property.
I am different poster.
Thanks for the break down.
How do you calculate total return a year? Do you include property value appreciation in it?
Instead of writing out how I calculate it, here is a good overview: https://www.wikihow.com/Figure-Cap-Rate
You should figure out what the cap rate is before you even think about putting in an offer on an investment property.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'll go the other way, in favor of a rental property, based on data rather than the emotion (it's such a hassle dealing with tenants).
If you are earning 5-10% return a year on your rental property, then it's a good investment. That is a healthy return that is going to be consistent and may increase over time as rents increase. Keep in mind that returns are impacted when stuff breaks (roof, appliances, etc).
The money you put in the stock market will return somewhere between 5-10%. Here is something that I just googled: For the period 1950 to 2009, if you adjust the S&P 500 for inflation and account for dividends, the average annual return comes out to exactly 7.0%
The difference in having an investment property is that there is capital appreciation. In the right neighborhoods, there has been a ton of appreciation in the last 10 years.
Your tax treatment of a rental property is more favorable (e.g. depreciation), you get a leveraged return if you are borrowing from the bank (e.g. if the property increases by 5% a year, you get the full increase despite the fact that the bank loaned you 70% of the cost of the property), you learn business 101 basics (e.g. what to charge in rent, how valuable your time is vs your money, etc), in 30 years or less the property will be paid off by your tenant's money, the consistent returns will continue on regardless of your age and the property can be handed down to your kids, etc.
Lastly, if the stock market collapses, like it did in 2007, your stock portfolio will be significantly impacted. If the price of your real estate investment drops like it did in 2007, that does not mean that rents drop (it most instances).
Long story short, owning a property is a long term play with long term benefits. If you are in it to win it for the long term, then go with a rental property.
I am different poster.
Thanks for the break down.
How do you calculate total return a year? Do you include property value appreciation in it?
Anonymous wrote:I'll go the other way, in favor of a rental property, based on data rather than the emotion (it's such a hassle dealing with tenants).
If you are earning 5-10% return a year on your rental property, then it's a good investment. That is a healthy return that is going to be consistent and may increase over time as rents increase. Keep in mind that returns are impacted when stuff breaks (roof, appliances, etc).
The money you put in the stock market will return somewhere between 5-10%. Here is something that I just googled: For the period 1950 to 2009, if you adjust the S&P 500 for inflation and account for dividends, the average annual return comes out to exactly 7.0%
The difference in having an investment property is that there is capital appreciation. In the right neighborhoods, there has been a ton of appreciation in the last 10 years.
Your tax treatment of a rental property is more favorable (e.g. depreciation), you get a leveraged return if you are borrowing from the bank (e.g. if the property increases by 5% a year, you get the full increase despite the fact that the bank loaned you 70% of the cost of the property), you learn business 101 basics (e.g. what to charge in rent, how valuable your time is vs your money, etc), in 30 years or less the property will be paid off by your tenant's money, the consistent returns will continue on regardless of your age and the property can be handed down to your kids, etc.
Lastly, if the stock market collapses, like it did in 2007, your stock portfolio will be significantly impacted. If the price of your real estate investment drops like it did in 2007, that does not mean that rents drop (it most instances).
Long story short, owning a property is a long term play with long term benefits. If you are in it to win it for the long term, then go with a rental property.
Anonymous wrote:Is this a viable and sustainable option?
Currently 37yo (single income family) and have about $400k in retirement and $300k in home equity. My company invests 15% of my base salary into my retirement account each year from company profits. Also, I am provided dividends from company profits on a yearly basis (untouchable until I retire and usually around $50k to $100k, depending on company profits - this is not an investment account, money sits stagnant until I retire).
Should I stop my max contribution to my 401k ($18,500) and rely on company deposits for my retirement and purchase a rental property for supplemental income?