Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
What, he only gets 2-1/2 years to fix a problem decades in the making?
Well, again, you DID highlight the phrase agreeing to apply getting rid of ALL managers. So yes. No exceptions, according to that standard. The head honcho doesn't get a free pass.
What? I didn’t highlight anything. The sentence above was my first post on this thread.
I apologize, sorry about that... It's hard to tell who's who when everyone is anonymous.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
What, he only gets 2-1/2 years to fix a problem decades in the making?
Well, again, you DID highlight the phrase agreeing to apply getting rid of ALL managers. So yes. No exceptions, according to that standard. The head honcho doesn't get a free pass.
What? I didn’t highlight anything. The sentence above was my first post on this thread.
Anonymous wrote:
What makes me so crazy over threads like these is the assumptions and the superiority. You assume that Metro doesn't consider safety and you know what it takes to maintain a station.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
What, he only gets 2-1/2 years to fix a problem decades in the making?
Well, again, you DID highlight the phrase agreeing to apply getting rid of ALL managers. So yes. No exceptions, according to that standard. The head honcho doesn't get a free pass.
Anonymous wrote:
What, he only gets 2-1/2 years to fix a problem decades in the making?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Why would it matter where a janitor is mopping up? The metro stations are in hire need of cleaning than bus garages.
Have you gone outside lately from the comfort of air conditioning? It's been hellishly hot outside, which especially affects workers with multi-hour shifts significantly spent under the blazing heat. This issue wouldn't apply to the underground portion of some stations, but many others are entirely above ground, lack adequate air conditioning, and are forced to rely on fans for relief. And that's only on the "partially inside" station area, they bear the full brunt of the heat outside.
I wouldn't be surprised if WMATA is not providing their workers with enough protection from heat stroke. Any cleaning that would be done at the Metro station segments that are outdoors or "partially inside" segments should really only be done at night time, to avoid the worst of the heat. Yet workers are being sent out in the daytime. I would say that's a valid excuse to strike, if an agreement could not be reached to rectify the situation.
What makes me so crazy over threads like these is the assumptions and the superiority. You assume that Metro doesn't consider safety and you know what it takes to maintain a station.
I didn't pull this out of thin air either, there's a history on the spectrum of this issue going back a while, for example:
https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp2/133/395/2292673/
https://ggwash.org/view/28239/greenbelt-bus-riders-need-some-shade
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
All of these would ordinarily be legitimate grounds for concern and objection. All of these would normally be appropriate for a union to protest. The problem is WMATA-ATU. They have become the unitary enemy of the public in this region. Metro doesn’t have plant problems - it has HR crises. Metro doesn’t have logistics issues - it has HR issues. The escalators aren’t broken - the problem is the escalator people and escalator managers. The ATU, like WMATA management, doesn’t seem to understand that the public has just had it with them, and would be perfectly happy to see the union broken and all managers fired. A controlled and well-implemented period of WMATA shutdown so as to completely re-staff would be welcomed by most people in the area.
This.
The first one to go should be General Manager Paul Wiedefeld. :p
Why?
You did highlight ALL managers fired. Best to start with the head, since they hold the ultimate responsibility.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Why would it matter where a janitor is mopping up? The metro stations are in hire need of cleaning than bus garages.
Have you gone outside lately from the comfort of air conditioning? It's been hellishly hot outside, which especially affects workers with multi-hour shifts significantly spent under the blazing heat. This issue wouldn't apply to the underground portion of some stations, but many others are entirely above ground, lack adequate air conditioning, and are forced to rely on fans for relief. And that's only on the "partially inside" station area, they bear the full brunt of the heat outside.
I wouldn't be surprised if WMATA is not providing their workers with enough protection from heat stroke. Any cleaning that would be done at the Metro station segments that are outdoors or "partially inside" segments should really only be done at night time, to avoid the worst of the heat. Yet workers are being sent out in the daytime. I would say that's a valid excuse to strike, if an agreement could not be reached to rectify the situation.
What makes me so crazy over threads like these is the assumptions and the superiority. You assume that Metro doesn't consider safety and you know what it takes to maintain a station.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Why would it matter where a janitor is mopping up? The metro stations are in hire need of cleaning than bus garages.
Have you gone outside lately from the comfort of air conditioning? It's been hellishly hot outside, which especially affects workers with multi-hour shifts significantly spent under the blazing heat. This issue wouldn't apply to the underground portion of some stations, but many others are entirely above ground, lack adequate air conditioning, and are forced to rely on fans for relief. And that's only on the "partially inside" station area, they bear the full brunt of the heat outside.
I wouldn't be surprised if WMATA is not providing their workers with enough protection from heat stroke. Any cleaning that would be done at the Metro station segments that are outdoors or "partially inside" segments should really only be done at night time, to avoid the worst of the heat. Yet workers are being sent out in the daytime. I would say that's a valid excuse to strike, if an agreement could not be reached to rectify the situation.
Anonymous wrote:METRO's union gives unions a bad name.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
All of these would ordinarily be legitimate grounds for concern and objection. All of these would normally be appropriate for a union to protest. The problem is WMATA-ATU. They have become the unitary enemy of the public in this region. Metro doesn’t have plant problems - it has HR crises. Metro doesn’t have logistics issues - it has HR issues. The escalators aren’t broken - the problem is the escalator people and escalator managers. The ATU, like WMATA management, doesn’t seem to understand that the public has just had it with them, and would be perfectly happy to see the union broken and all managers fired. A controlled and well-implemented period of WMATA shutdown so as to completely re-staff would be welcomed by most people in the area.
This.
The first one to go should be General Manager Paul Wiedefeld. :p
Why?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
All of these would ordinarily be legitimate grounds for concern and objection. All of these would normally be appropriate for a union to protest. The problem is WMATA-ATU. They have become the unitary enemy of the public in this region. Metro doesn’t have plant problems - it has HR crises. Metro doesn’t have logistics issues - it has HR issues. The escalators aren’t broken - the problem is the escalator people and escalator managers. The ATU, like WMATA management, doesn’t seem to understand that the public has just had it with them, and would be perfectly happy to see the union broken and all managers fired. A controlled and well-implemented period of WMATA shutdown so as to completely re-staff would be welcomed by most people in the area.
This.
The first one to go should be General Manager Paul Wiedefeld. :p
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
All of these would ordinarily be legitimate grounds for concern and objection. All of these would normally be appropriate for a union to protest. The problem is WMATA-ATU. They have become the unitary enemy of the public in this region. Metro doesn’t have plant problems - it has HR crises. Metro doesn’t have logistics issues - it has HR issues. The escalators aren’t broken - the problem is the escalator people and escalator managers. The ATU, like WMATA management, doesn’t seem to understand that the public has just had it with them, and would be perfectly happy to see the union broken and all managers fired. A controlled and well-implemented period of WMATA shutdown so as to completely re-staff would be welcomed by most people in the area.
This.
Anonymous wrote:
All of these would ordinarily be legitimate grounds for concern and objection. All of these would normally be appropriate for a union to protest. The problem is WMATA-ATU. They have become the unitary enemy of the public in this region. Metro doesn’t have plant problems - it has HR crises. Metro doesn’t have logistics issues - it has HR issues. The escalators aren’t broken - the problem is the escalator people and escalator managers. The ATU, like WMATA management, doesn’t seem to understand that the public has just had it with them, and would be perfectly happy to see the union broken and all managers fired. A controlled and well-implemented period of WMATA shutdown so as to completely re-staff would be welcomed by most people in the area.