Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She doesn’t feel the need to follow percent when she believes it was wrongly decided. So much for the doctrine of state decisis. It’s the Wild West for her strict textuslist nonsense.

^^^ precedent

Anonymous wrote:She apparently doesn't believe in judicial precedent. Doesn't this bother anyone?

Anonymous wrote:She doesn’t feel the need to follow percent when she believes it was wrongly decided. So much for the doctrine of state decisis. It’s the Wild West for her strict textuslist nonsense.

Anonymous wrote:Laura Ingraham also has special needs children adopted from other countries, and I have heard really awful, not empathetic things coming out of her mouth about immigrants.
I think some people adopt because they want to look like they care, not because they actually care.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No thank you. Per Wikipedia...

The New York Times reported that Barrett was a member of a small, tightly knit Christian group called People of Praise.[9] Members of this religious group swear a lifelong oath of loyalty to one another, and commit to be accountable to a personal advisor (either referred to as a "head" or a "handmaid").[9] The heads and handmaids instruct the member on important life decisions.[9] Legal scholars say that such an oath raises legitimate questions about the ability to serve as an independent and impartial judge.[9]

The People of Praise appear to be some kind of bizarre charasmatic renewal group whose beliefs are rooted in the Pentacostal movement. We do not need another hyper religious Justice on the Supreme Court, especially with Roe v. Wade and LGBT rights hanging by a thread. Trump will probably pick a woman to persuade liberals to back down, but this woman sounds extremely problematic.

Fortunately, we live in a country where religious beliefs cannot preclude someone from holding public office. It’s illegal.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is on the final 5 according to today's news. Trump needs to expand his list a little bit. Too few Ivy leaguers.

Huh?? That’s a good thing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No thank you. Per Wikipedia...

The New York Times reported that Barrett was a member of a small, tightly knit Christian group called People of Praise.[9] Members of this religious group swear a lifelong oath of loyalty to one another, and commit to be accountable to a personal advisor (either referred to as a "head" or a "handmaid").[9] The heads and handmaids instruct the member on important life decisions.[9] Legal scholars say that such an oath raises legitimate questions about the ability to serve as an independent and impartial judge.[9]

The People of Praise appear to be some kind of bizarre charasmatic renewal group whose beliefs are rooted in the Pentacostal movement. We do not need another hyper religious Justice on the Supreme Court, especially with Roe v. Wade and LGBT rights hanging by a thread. Trump will probably pick a woman to persuade liberals to back down, but this woman sounds extremely problematic.

Fortunately, we live in a country where religious beliefs cannot preclude someone from holding public office. It’s illegal.

Anonymous wrote:No thank you. Per Wikipedia...

The New York Times reported that Barrett was a member of a small, tightly knit Christian group called People of Praise.[9] Members of this religious group swear a lifelong oath of loyalty to one another, and commit to be accountable to a personal advisor (either referred to as a "head" or a "handmaid").[9] The heads and handmaids instruct the member on important life decisions.[9] Legal scholars say that such an oath raises legitimate questions about the ability to serve as an independent and impartial judge.[9]

The People of Praise appear to be some kind of bizarre charasmatic renewal group whose beliefs are rooted in the Pentacostal movement. We do not need another hyper religious Justice on the Supreme Court, especially with Roe v. Wade and LGBT rights hanging by a thread. Trump will probably pick a woman to persuade liberals to back down, but this woman sounds extremely problematic.