Anonymous wrote:Look. The point of the story is that nothing the father did would have made any difference. Schizophrenia is on a spectrum. All the brothers are suffering from it to varying degrees. One of the other brothers (still alive) was hospitalized with mental illness. The study was done to see if schizophrenia is genetically predetermined or not.
I think Yale buried the study because sadly the answer is probably yes--and that fact would be too disturbing for the subjects to discover and perhaps society at large as well.
How do you know this? The movie did not say this definitively.
The movie only talks about the three being treated for depression.
Anonymous wrote:Look. The point of the story is that nothing the father did would have made any difference. Schizophrenia is on a spectrum. All the brothers are suffering from it to varying degrees. One of the other brothers (still alive) was hospitalized with mental illness. The study was done to see if schizophrenia is genetically predetermined or not.
I think Yale buried the study because sadly the answer is probably yes--and that fact would be too disturbing for the subjects to discover and perhaps society at large as well.
How do you know this? The movie did not say this definitively.
The movie only talks about the three being treated for depression.
Look. The point of the story is that nothing the father did would have made any difference. Schizophrenia is on a spectrum. All the brothers are suffering from it to varying degrees. One of the other brothers (still alive) was hospitalized with mental illness. The study was done to see if schizophrenia is genetically predetermined or not.
I think Yale buried the study because sadly the answer is probably yes--and that fact would be too disturbing for the subjects to discover and perhaps society at large as well.
How do you know this? The movie did not say this definitively.
Look. The point of the story is that nothing the father did would have made any difference. Schizophrenia is on a spectrum. All the brothers are suffering from it to varying degrees. One of the other brothers (still alive) was hospitalized with mental illness. The study was done to see if schizophrenia is genetically predetermined or not.
I think Yale buried the study because sadly the answer is probably yes--and that fact would be too disturbing for the subjects to discover and perhaps society at large as well.
Anonymous wrote:I couldn’t believe even their younger sisters were all placed with each family as part of the study design. That’s got to mess with your head wondering how much of your life was “designed” and how different (or not) you may have turned out depending on which family you were placed with.
Anonymous wrote:
This kind of stuff happens all the time where siblings get split up to meet the parents needs.
No, this doesn’t happen all the time. WTF are you talking about?
The adoption agency colluded with the scientists to separate several sets of multiples and then examine and test them for years for their own personal career curiosity. Watch the entire documentary. None of the adoptive parents were told anything. And Yale University and the Jewish Children’s organization are withholding all the information. There are still people out there that were in the study that have no idea they are a multiple. The scientists are smug it’s awful. The entire thing should have been illlegal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This kind of stuff happens all the time where siblings get split up to meet the parents needs.
No, this doesn’t happen all the time. WTF are you talking about?
The adoption agency colluded with the scientists to separate several sets of multiples and then examine and test them for years for their own personal career curiosity. Watch the entire documentary. None of the adoptive parents were told anything. And Yale University and the Jewish Children’s organization are withholding all the information. There are still people out there that were in the study that have no idea they are a multiple. The scientists are smug it’s awful. The entire thing should have been illlegal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I didn't like the way they insinuated that the one father was to blame for what happened to his son. There was no evidence of this...and here the poor dad agreed to be interviewed for the film. I wonder how he feels about the end product.
I totally agree! Thought that was horrible and cruel.
Anonymous wrote:This kind of stuff happens all the time where siblings get split up to meet the parents needs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I didn't like the way they insinuated that the one father was to blame for what happened to his son. There was no evidence of this...and here the poor dad agreed to be interviewed for the film. I wonder how he feels about the end product.
I totally agree! Thought that was horrible and cruel.