Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, good - I hope they save the funding for the actual disabled people now.
The problem is without the ASD diagnosis many kids who need services, regardless of what it is, go without as their parents cannot afford that kind of private pay. So, in less insurance will pay for speech for a language disorder, or behavioral help for ADHD, often these kids are getting diagnosed as there aren't any other good options to get them the specialized help they need.
+1 my son has a legit receptive/expressive language disorder. We can’t afford the $500 per month speech therapy without removing all of the other activityes he loves- so we made a hard choice to remove the therapy so he can take piano lessons and play his sport.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, good - I hope they save the funding for the actual disabled people now.
The problem is without the ASD diagnosis many kids who need services, regardless of what it is, go without as their parents cannot afford that kind of private pay. So, in less insurance will pay for speech for a language disorder, or behavioral help for ADHD, often these kids are getting diagnosed as there aren't any other good options to get them the specialized help they need.
Anonymous wrote:Yes, good - I hope they save the funding for the actual disabled people now.