Anonymous wrote:Who cares? GS-15 pay is chump change here in DC.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:$160k a year is chump change?!? Especially when you factor in a 40 hour work week and the benefits (leave, pension, health). If you ask me, the people working 60+ hours a week in private sector and making $200k with no pension are the ones working like dogs.
While I agree with you, many 15s aren't making $160k a year. It takes a long time to climb the ladder. I'm a 15-2 making less than nearly all the employees I supervise, who have all been there much longer than me and are 14-10s. (I started with the agency as a 13 and was a 14-3 before promotion.) It will be another decade at least before I'm making the top amount.
Are any of your 14 step 10s non-supervisory? If so, you should pursue the supervisor differential...OPM Personnel Actions, Chapter 17, Pay and Step Changes, Rule 24, 5 U.S.C. 5755
Thanks, I'll check it out. They're all non-supervisory. It's an office of attorneys. A supervisor and 10 line attorneys.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:$160k a year is chump change?!? Especially when you factor in a 40 hour work week and the benefits (leave, pension, health). If you ask me, the people working 60+ hours a week in private sector and making $200k with no pension are the ones working like dogs.
While I agree with you, many 15s aren't making $160k a year. It takes a long time to climb the ladder. I'm a 15-2 making less than nearly all the employees I supervise, who have all been there much longer than me and are 14-10s. (I started with the agency as a 13 and was a 14-3 before promotion.) It will be another decade at least before I'm making the top amount.
Are any of your 14 step 10s non-supervisory? If so, you should pursue the supervisor differential...OPM Personnel Actions, Chapter 17, Pay and Step Changes, Rule 24, 5 U.S.C. 5755
Anonymous wrote:30 year old female who is SES here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:$160k a year is chump change?!? Especially when you factor in a 40 hour work week and the benefits (leave, pension, health). If you ask me, the people working 60+ hours a week in private sector and making $200k with no pension are the ones working like dogs.
While I agree with you, many 15s aren't making $160k a year. It takes a long time to climb the ladder. I'm a 15-2 making less than nearly all the employees I supervise, who have all been there much longer than me and are 14-10s. (I started with the agency as a 13 and was a 14-3 before promotion.) It will be another decade at least before I'm making the top amount.
Anonymous wrote:$160k a year is chump change?!? Especially when you factor in a 40 hour work week and the benefits (leave, pension, health). If you ask me, the people working 60+ hours a week in private sector and making $200k with no pension are the ones working like dogs.