Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The real issue as I see it, is that there are so few seats in these classrooms when there should be more. More kids could be served, but I don't think the Aspergers program has grown at all in the 20 years since it was rolled out. But, the incidence of autism has skyrocketed. Is it that all those newly diagnosed kids are ok in mainstream classes? I imagine that the need for Aspergers classrooms is outpacing the resources that MCPS is putting toward it.
But are you willing to shift some of your income toward more taxes to pay for more resources? The Asperger’s classrooms typically have 2-3 paras plus 1-2 teachers with advance degrees and years of experience and a smaller number of gen ed students in the cotaught courses so another part-time teacher might be needed to teach those kids. That’s a lot of salaries and benefits.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid is well above grade level and needed more behavioral/emotional support than yours was in the Asperger's program. They did fine with her. They do offer a lot of individualized instruction, so I don't see why they would have a problem with your kid.
Laura Solomon is the advocate who got the placement for us. She is EXTREMELY aggressive and MCPS knows her all too well. In fact, you might get the placement just by threatening to hire her. :lol
Imagine what happens to the quality of the program if many students who are poor candidates are admitted because their parents threaten to hire an extremely aggressive advocate or attorney? How does that turn out for the students who are perfect candidates? Will they be properly served if staff is overwhelmed try to meet the needs of students who don't fit the profile the program is intended to serve?
I know because why would Special ed students need any help with anything? Everyone knows that the best special ed kids are the ones who have no issues at all. The best special ed programs should be reserved for the perfect kids!
You have 0 experience with the Asperger’s programs if you think the perfect candidates need no help at all. There’s intense work on social skills and work study habits. They need support with navigating the changes in routine and productive chaos of a gen ed classroom much of the day. Shame on you for dismissing the hard work and successes of those kids because they don’t fit the same learning profile as your DC.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid is well above grade level and needed more behavioral/emotional support than yours was in the Asperger's program. They did fine with her. They do offer a lot of individualized instruction, so I don't see why they would have a problem with your kid.
Laura Solomon is the advocate who got the placement for us. She is EXTREMELY aggressive and MCPS knows her all too well. In fact, you might get the placement just by threatening to hire her. :lol
She is extremely unpleasant too.
There are so many threads about this topic. Yes, she is polarizing. She is also, in my case, proven to be extremely effective. So honestly, I don't care. Beyond that I actually liked her.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid is well above grade level and needed more behavioral/emotional support than yours was in the Asperger's program. They did fine with her. They do offer a lot of individualized instruction, so I don't see why they would have a problem with your kid.
Laura Solomon is the advocate who got the placement for us. She is EXTREMELY aggressive and MCPS knows her all too well. In fact, you might get the placement just by threatening to hire her. :lol
She is extremely unpleasant too.
Anonymous wrote:Your daughter will be referred to the Asperger program if and only if you can proof that the current placement (home school model) cannot support her. For example, the school staff has exhausted all resources but she's still having meltdowns every single day, interrupting the class.
If she's having only occasional behavior issues, she will stay in the current placement even though you think she can benefit from 1:1 social skills coaching. Note that even in the Asperger program, it doesn't mean that the teachers/aides will facilitate social skills at recess. Just like any other program, the Asperger program might work for some kids but not the others - it's not a magic placement.
Anonymous wrote:My kid is well above grade level and needed more behavioral/emotional support than yours was in the Asperger's program. They did fine with her. They do offer a lot of individualized instruction, so I don't see why they would have a problem with your kid.
Laura Solomon is the advocate who got the placement for us. She is EXTREMELY aggressive and MCPS knows her all too well. In fact, you might get the placement just by threatening to hire her. :lol
Anonymous wrote:I could write a book here, but basically we've been struggling with MCPS for over 2 years. Our DD has HFA and some academic challenges related to her ASD. She needs increasing social skills support and 1:1 coaching to resolve social conflicts, but no other "behavioral" issues (she has not been a behavioral problem in school). We have been told twice over the last two years that the Asperger's program is not a good fit for her, but her IEP team at her home school agrees she needs more support than they can provide in the gen ed setting. We have hired advocates, consultants, therapists, we have had her therapists write letters that she needs a different placement - all to be told at a recent IEP that Asperger's isn't the right placement but perhaps her file needs to be referred to the central office. I know that means considering other placements within MCPS and maybe even private - but I'm so confused i trying to determine what is the right fit. We thought Asperger's because she has ASD and to us - all of her issues are connected with that. But the Autism Unit says no - she needs too much emotional/academic support (??!). But we think she is too high functioning for a private placement. We feel totally stuck between a rock and a hard place.
What placements have worked for your child with a similar profile? We are exhausted and at the end of our rope. We can't afford Auburn, Commonwealth, etc.
Anonymous wrote:The real issue as I see it, is that there are so few seats in these classrooms when there should be more. More kids could be served, but I don't think the Aspergers program has grown at all in the 20 years since it was rolled out. But, the incidence of autism has skyrocketed. Is it that all those newly diagnosed kids are ok in mainstream classes? I imagine that the need for Aspergers classrooms is outpacing the resources that MCPS is putting toward it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid is well above grade level and needed more behavioral/emotional support than yours was in the Asperger's program. They did fine with her. They do offer a lot of individualized instruction, so I don't see why they would have a problem with your kid.
Laura Solomon is the advocate who got the placement for us. She is EXTREMELY aggressive and MCPS knows her all too well. In fact, you might get the placement just by threatening to hire her. :lol
Imagine what happens to the quality of the program if many students who are poor candidates are admitted because their parents threaten to hire an extremely aggressive advocate or attorney? How does that turn out for the students who are perfect candidates? Will they be properly served if staff is overwhelmed try to meet the needs of students who don't fit the profile the program is intended to serve?
I know because why would Special ed students need any help with anything? Everyone knows that the best special ed kids are the ones who have no issues at all. The best special ed programs should be reserved for the perfect kids!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid is well above grade level and needed more behavioral/emotional support than yours was in the Asperger's program. They did fine with her. They do offer a lot of individualized instruction, so I don't see why they would have a problem with your kid.
Laura Solomon is the advocate who got the placement for us. She is EXTREMELY aggressive and MCPS knows her all too well. In fact, you might get the placement just by threatening to hire her. :lol
Imagine what happens to the quality of the program if many students who are poor candidates are admitted because their parents threaten to hire an extremely aggressive advocate or attorney? How does that turn out for the students who are perfect candidates? Will they be properly served if staff is overwhelmed try to meet the needs of students who don't fit the profile the program is intended to serve?
Anonymous wrote:Avoid the Bridge program at all costs.