Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:APS needs to control spending. The spending is out of control.
How do they do that and build more seats?
Anonymous wrote:Just saw a Clement ad on fb and she says schools not trailers or something. Not saying support her but she is advertising she is for schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In the primary, de Ferranti, but only because he appears to have at least the vaguest inkling of our schools’ needs while Choun doesn’t appear to have any. Generally election, Vihstadt. He’s the only one who gets that we can’t leep loading up the county with high-density residential (affordable or not) without building more schools.
Yup, definitely Vihstadt overall. The candidates in the Dem primary have no idea what they are doing.
I'll hold my nose and vote for V. I didn't vote for him last time, but I'm not seeing anything from De Ferranti that makes me believe he will push back against the insanity of inviting thousands of families to live in CAFs, approving upzoning in GLUPs, and approving SFH lot subdivisions, and then pretending the kids are not here, or are just a temporary blip on the radar. The only way they will get the message is if we don't vote for their guy. No swim palace. I was fine with the idea, in theory, and voted for the bond. But nobody told me that my kids might have to go to HS in shifts at the time so that we could operate a swimming facility that will lose money every year.
+1
Well said.
Anonymous wrote:APS needs to control spending. The spending is out of control.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m a South is who was livid about the cancellation of the streetcar.
That’s water under the bridge. Vihstadt all the way.
Sock puppet.
I'm a liberal democrat in south Arlington, opposed the streetcar, voted for JV for that reason, and will happily vote for him again. He was the first and AFAIK the only county board candidate to visit my neighborhood this year, asked me in person what my concerns were. My precinct is the most dem leaning in the entire county. He prob won't win here, but came here anyway.
If you read their January speeches on the CB website you really can see the differences in priority. The dem base in Arlington is mostly older people with grown children or none; and developers and similar who work but don't live here. Civic assns are similar; old people who generally don't give a hoot about schools except to complain about traffic. Board members need to go door to door to hear an alternate point of view and JV does it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m a South is who was livid about the cancellation of the streetcar.
That’s water under the bridge. Vihstadt all the way.
Sock puppet.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m a South is who was livid about the cancellation of the streetcar.
That’s water under the bridge. Vihstadt all the way.
Sock puppet.
Anonymous wrote:I’m a South is who was livid about the cancellation of the streetcar.
That’s water under the bridge. Vihstadt all the way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Both Dorsey and Cristol campaigned on the promise of more coordination with APS. I asked them and they both talked about it. Of course, Cristol didn't really say anything, it was all non-committal consultant speak, literally.
Vihstat is the only one who questions county spending, to include CAFs, aquatics etc. So, perhaps if he had been more than just ONE vote all the extra budget money at the end of the year (like $11 million or so) could have been used for schools, or something (like flooding in certain neighborhoods). Think of all the end of the year money that goes to the AFIH fund, like $10million a year. Over 4 years that a new elementary school! An underground parking garage!
The County wants to spend money to keep lower income families in Arlington, I get that. But that isn't leaving enough money for them to have a real seat in a real classroom.
+100
What I'd vote for is anyone who commits to requiring developers who add housing density to also put in money for school construction funds. Ridiculous that they'll get them to pay for public art instead of schools.