Anonymous wrote:The SPLC has ZERO-POINT-ZERO credibility, Jeff. None. Zip. Nada. Even the Obama Justice Dept had to distance itself from their lunacy.
Dees and Potok are just shakedown artists and con men.
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:I felt the same way about Valerie Jarrett. And I still do about Awan.
I was about to delete your post because it is completely full of ignorance. But, I'm going to give you a chance to explain yourself. But, if you prove to be as ignorant as it appears, I delete your posts then. At worst, Awan is a criminal. He has never held a policy-making position. He is not known to hold any bigoted views. I am not up to date on on the Jarrett conspiracy theories and nobody has provided any adequate explanations for the Jarrett hatred in the other thread, but please explain why she is just as bad as the Islamophobes in the NSC?
Do you delete left wing "ignorant" posts -- I don't think very often.
You would be surprised. I don't like idiots who make the left look bad.
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:I felt the same way about Valerie Jarrett. And I still do about Awan.
I was about to delete your post because it is completely full of ignorance. But, I'm going to give you a chance to explain yourself. But, if you prove to be as ignorant as it appears, I delete your posts then. At worst, Awan is a criminal. He has never held a policy-making position. He is not known to hold any bigoted views. I am not up to date on on the Jarrett conspiracy theories and nobody has provided any adequate explanations for the Jarrett hatred in the other thread, but please explain why she is just as bad as the Islamophobes in the NSC?
Do you delete left wing "ignorant" posts -- I don't think very often.
Anonymous wrote:Awan was hired - and protected - by people in policy-making positions. If he's a criminal, he appears to have gotten away with it. The question is, will the policy-making individuals be held accountable for their part in this? Were they directly involved or simply over-empathetic victims?
Jarrett's hands are all over the Iran deal, and many folk do not support that deal. We should be allowed to feel that deal was not good for America, but instead, we are called names and accused of being evil, racist, etc.
It's an interesting world
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:I felt the same way about Valerie Jarrett. And I still do about Awan.
I was about to delete your post because it is completely full of ignorance. But, I'm going to give you a chance to explain yourself. But, if you prove to be as ignorant as it appears, I delete your posts then. At worst, Awan is a criminal. He has never held a policy-making position. He is not known to hold any bigoted views. I am not up to date on on the Jarrett conspiracy theories and nobody has provided any adequate explanations for the Jarrett hatred in the other thread, but please explain why she is just as bad as the Islamophobes in the NSC?
Do you delete left wing "ignorant" posts -- I don't think very often.
Hey, we all agree on something!![]()
![]()
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:I felt the same way about Valerie Jarrett. And I still do about Awan.
I was about to delete your post because it is completely full of ignorance. But, I'm going to give you a chance to explain yourself. But, if you prove to be as ignorant as it appears, I delete your posts then. At worst, Awan is a criminal. He has never held a policy-making position. He is not known to hold any bigoted views. I am not up to date on on the Jarrett conspiracy theories and nobody has provided any adequate explanations for the Jarrett hatred in the other thread, but please explain why she is just as bad as the Islamophobes in the NSC?
Do you delete left wing "ignorant" posts -- I don't think very often.
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:I felt the same way about Valerie Jarrett. And I still do about Awan.
I was about to delete your post because it is completely full of ignorance. But, I'm going to give you a chance to explain yourself. But, if you prove to be as ignorant as it appears, I delete your posts then. At worst, Awan is a criminal. He has never held a policy-making position. He is not known to hold any bigoted views. I am not up to date on on the Jarrett conspiracy theories and nobody has provided any adequate explanations for the Jarrett hatred in the other thread, but please explain why she is just as bad as the Islamophobes in the NSC?
Do you delete left wing "ignorant" posts -- I don't think very often.
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:I felt the same way about Valerie Jarrett. And I still do about Awan.
I was about to delete your post because it is completely full of ignorance. But, I'm going to give you a chance to explain yourself. But, if you prove to be as ignorant as it appears, I delete your posts then. At worst, Awan is a criminal. He has never held a policy-making position. He is not known to hold any bigoted views. I am not up to date on on the Jarrett conspiracy theories and nobody has provided any adequate explanations for the Jarrett hatred in the other thread, but please explain why she is just as bad as the Islamophobes in the NSC?
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:I felt the same way about Valerie Jarrett. And I still do about Awan.
I was about to delete your post because it is completely full of ignorance. But, I'm going to give you a chance to explain yourself. But, if you prove to be as ignorant as it appears, I delete your posts then. At worst, Awan is a criminal. He has never held a policy-making position. He is not known to hold any bigoted views. I am not up to date on on the Jarrett conspiracy theories and nobody has provided any adequate explanations for the Jarrett hatred in the other thread, but please explain why she is just as bad as the Islamophobes in the NSC?
Anonymous wrote:I don't know if they believe that America is going to be taken over, but I DO know that that is the goal of a caliphate?
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:People still take Slpc designations seriously?
I guess you mean the SPLC, but if you don't like that group, try the ADL.