Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The shootings are terrible and it is hard for me to believe that we live in a world where this happens. But the chances of your child being involved in a school shooting are so small that it should not be a factor. You should worry about how she gets to school and the distance traveled. Because her ride there is likely the riskiest part of her day.
This is stupid. Of course it is a factor. One is enough for most people to re-evaluate their children's safety at school. Do you have children?
Are plane crashes a factor in you choosing to travel? I agree with the previous poster that these are still statistically very unlikely, and while we should work to solve this problem as a society, it's not a factor in where my kids go to school.
Statistically, what should affect your choices of where to live are: car crashes, opioid addiction, and suicide.
It is stupid not to consider it at all, regardless of how irrational the consideration might be. But to each her own.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The problem with public schools is that it is difficult to weed out the problem kids. If there is a kid with behaviors or psychological problems that are worrisome, he or she would be counseled out of a private school before anything happens...or better yet, never be admitted. In a pubic school, you are basically stuck with the student body you have, including all the misfits harboring rage. It's a sad fact.
?
The Florida shooter had been kicked out of his public school. He was mad, and he came back shooting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The shootings are terrible and it is hard for me to believe that we live in a world where this happens. But the chances of your child being involved in a school shooting are so small that it should not be a factor. You should worry about how she gets to school and the distance traveled. Because her ride there is likely the riskiest part of her day.
This is stupid. Of course it is a factor. One is enough for most people to re-evaluate their children's safety at school. Do you have children?
Are plane crashes a factor in you choosing to travel? I agree with the previous poster that these are still statistically very unlikely, and while we should work to solve this problem as a society, it's not a factor in where my kids go to school.
Statistically, what should affect your choices of where to live are: car crashes, opioid addiction, and suicide.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The shootings are terrible and it is hard for me to believe that we live in a world where this happens. But the chances of your child being involved in a school shooting are so small that it should not be a factor. You should worry about how she gets to school and the distance traveled. Because her ride there is likely the riskiest part of her day.
This is stupid. Of course it is a factor. One is enough for most people to re-evaluate their children's safety at school. Do you have children?
Anonymous wrote:The shootings are terrible and it is hard for me to believe that we live in a world where this happens. But the chances of your child being involved in a school shooting are so small that it should not be a factor. You should worry about how she gets to school and the distance traveled. Because her ride there is likely the riskiest part of her day.
Anonymous wrote:The problem with public schools is that it is difficult to weed out the problem kids. If there is a kid with behaviors or psychological problems that are worrisome, he or she would be counseled out of a private school before anything happens...or better yet, never be admitted. In a pubic school, you are basically stuck with the student body you have, including all the misfits harboring rage. It's a sad fact.
Anonymous wrote:Private schools probably have discreet ways of asking families as part of the interviewing process if there are guns in their homes, and weed out those families.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think private schools are "safer," in the sense that a potential shooter -- i.e. a child who is in trouble -- would be identified and counseled early, hopefully mitigating their reaching a crisis point.
However, even that is not foolproof. The Santa Fe shooter apparently showed few signs of dysfunctionality until a couple of months ago. Those signs were that of mild depression, which many teens go through. I doubt that would have been caught even at a private school.
That said, I think the parents who did not secure the guns in their home have a lot to answer for.
The things he posted on social media appeared to suggest that he glorified violence and had sympathy towards hate groups, NOTsigns of mild depression. According to CNN, "Pagourtzis has a social media footprint that included an image of a custom T-shirt emblazoned with the words, "BORN TO KILL" posted on Facebook and several images of a black duster jacket with Nazi, communist, fascist and religious symbols." How are these not red flags? He was also known to be very interested in guns and violent video games. Some kid in the school told her parents she was worried that he would hurt her.
Anonymous wrote:Private schools probably have discreet ways of asking families as part of the interviewing process if there are guns in their homes, and weed out those families.