Anonymous wrote:All these "let it go" folks are ridiculous.
I love the "do you need the money?" especially.
I've BTDT. No matter what - you need the financial support. Maybe not immediately but no one can argue that a not having to worry about college is a bad thing. I didn't "need" any financial support and out of sheer spite I didn't go to court and I regret it.
No, we didn't suffer. But the fact that I let an adult man shirk his responsibilities - even just financially - bothers me to this day. I should have asked and received whatever my child was entitled to - and bank if for child if not "needed".
Also - FYI child support is separate from visitation/custody - meaning you can take him to court for child support and establish that you are the primary custodian but unless he presses for visitation, it's not addressed. Basically - if he doesn't want to be involved then let him not be involved but yes, make sure that he provides the finances required whether that's in support or medical insurance.
Anonymous wrote:All these "let it go" folks are ridiculous.
I love the "do you need the money?" especially.
I've BTDT. No matter what - you need the financial support. Maybe not immediately but no one can argue that a not having to worry about college is a bad thing. I didn't "need" any financial support and out of sheer spite I didn't go to court and I regret it.
No, we didn't suffer. But the fact that I let an adult man shirk his responsibilities - even just financially - bothers me to this day. I should have asked and received whatever my child was entitled to - and bank if for child if not "needed".
Also - FYI child support is separate from visitation/custody - meaning you can take him to court for child support and establish that you are the primary custodian but unless he presses for visitation, it's not addressed. Basically - if he doesn't want to be involved then let him not be involved but yes, make sure that he provides the finances required whether that's in support or medical insurance.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When someone isn't showing any inclination to be in your child's life, maybe it's best to let that be.
No. The child is entitled to the financial support of both parents. The child should not suffer because his father is an ass.
The child will suffer anyway if the father is an ass, regardless of how much money the father pours in. I say this as someone who is divorced from a wealthy man who financially supports his child but is not interested in seeing her more than once a month. He doesn't go to her school events even when she asks him to. He didn't come to her birthday party this year. He pays, but he isn't there for her and there are times when I think it would have been easier to just let him fade out of her life when she was much younger.
At least he is giving money.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When someone isn't showing any inclination to be in your child's life, maybe it's best to let that be.
No. The child is entitled to the financial support of both parents. The child should not suffer because his father is an ass.
+1. Hold him accountable, just as you are accountable.
It is ridiculous that women get stuck with full responsibility- it needs to end. Men need to at least pay their part, even if they ignore any parenting responsibility.
No. Women have total control over whether the child is brought into the world or not. Therefore they should have full responsibility if the child is brought into the world.
Remember that "choice" thing? You have choices. Yay! But with choices come responsibility for the outcome.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You can file for child support, even without his acknowledgement of paternity, and the court will order a DNA test - he will have to comply or risk arrest.
It’s not a fast process, and is unlikely to end in him “wanting” to be involved with the child, but it may bring you some financial relief.
That's not true, he won't get arrested for not taking a DNA test. The court will issue a default judgment against him if he doesn't comply though.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When someone isn't showing any inclination to be in your child's life, maybe it's best to let that be.
No. The child is entitled to the financial support of both parents. The child should not suffer because his father is an ass.
+1. Hold him accountable, just as you are accountable.
It is ridiculous that women get stuck with full responsibility- it needs to end. Men need to at least pay their part, even if they ignore any parenting responsibility.
No. Women have total control over whether the child is brought into the world or not. Therefore they should have full responsibility if the child is brought into the world.
Remember that "choice" thing? You have choices. Yay! But with choices come responsibility for the outcome.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When someone isn't showing any inclination to be in your child's life, maybe it's best to let that be.
No. The child is entitled to the financial support of both parents. The child should not suffer because his father is an ass.
+1. Hold him accountable, just as you are accountable.
It is ridiculous that women get stuck with full responsibility- it needs to end. Men need to at least pay their part, even if they ignore any parenting responsibility.
No. Women have total control over whether the child is brought into the world or not. Therefore they should have full responsibility if the child is brought into the world.
Remember that "choice" thing? You have choices. Yay! But with choices come responsibility for the outcome.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When someone isn't showing any inclination to be in your child's life, maybe it's best to let that be.
No. The child is entitled to the financial support of both parents. The child should not suffer because his father is an ass.
+1. Hold him accountable, just as you are accountable.
It is ridiculous that women get stuck with full responsibility- it needs to end. Men need to at least pay their part, even if they ignore any parenting responsibility.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When someone isn't showing any inclination to be in your child's life, maybe it's best to let that be.
No. The child is entitled to the financial support of both parents. The child should not suffer because his father is an ass.
+1. Hold him accountable, just as you are accountable.
It is ridiculous that women get stuck with full responsibility- it needs to end. Men need to at least pay their part, even if they ignore any parenting responsibility.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When someone isn't showing any inclination to be in your child's life, maybe it's best to let that be.
No. The child is entitled to the financial support of both parents. The child should not suffer because his father is an ass.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No judgment please just need some advice.
My baby’s father denies the baby is his and even suggested I had been with multiple men and he can’t be sure it’s his. Do I have any rights legally? Can I claim child support? How do I do that anyway? I know with 100% certainty he is the father. Maybe after the DNA test he’ll want to be involved? Anyone in similar situations?
This was my husband 18 years ago. The baby could not be his. He also threatened to "make the baby motherless" if I filed for divorce. Since I was new to the country he said that if a disappeared no one would know it.
And you married him?!?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No judgment please just need some advice.
My baby’s father denies the baby is his and even suggested I had been with multiple men and he can’t be sure it’s his. Do I have any rights legally? Can I claim child support? How do I do that anyway? I know with 100% certainty he is the father. Maybe after the DNA test he’ll want to be involved? Anyone in similar situations?
This was my husband 18 years ago. The baby could not be his. He also threatened to "make the baby motherless" if I filed for divorce. Since I was new to the country he said that if a disappeared no one would know it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When someone isn't showing any inclination to be in your child's life, maybe it's best to let that be.
No. The child is entitled to the financial support of both parents. The child should not suffer because his father is an ass.
The child will suffer anyway if the father is an ass, regardless of how much money the father pours in. I say this as someone who is divorced from a wealthy man who financially supports his child but is not interested in seeing her more than once a month. He doesn't go to her school events even when she asks him to. He didn't come to her birthday party this year. He pays, but he isn't there for her and there are times when I think it would have been easier to just let him fade out of her life when she was much younger.