Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DH here. DW can always outlast me in a fight. No matter how exhausted she is, she'll keep yelling, and keep escalating. Not great at controlling her emotions. Best case scenario is she cries herself to sleep.
On the flip side, if I'm pissed at her, I'll go sleep in the guest room, and lock the door. Sure, she could (and does occasionally) unlock it with a paper clip, but it's a strong message that I'm disengaging and won't keep fighting. I have never locked her out of our room.
Not a perfect solution, but better than the alternative given she can't control her anger and emotions. Occasionally, if she knows she is at fault, she will calm down, unlock the door after I've fallen asleep, and get in the guest room bed with me and sleep there.
So, when she is upset about something, your response is to completely disengage, then wonder why she continues to escalate? She wants to talk to you. It doesn't sound to me like either of you are good at controlling your emotions. It just looks different when you feel out of control.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DH here. DW can always outlast me in a fight. No matter how exhausted she is, she'll keep yelling, and keep escalating. Not great at controlling her emotions. Best case scenario is she cries herself to sleep.
On the flip side, if I'm pissed at her, I'll go sleep in the guest room, and lock the door. Sure, she could (and does occasionally) unlock it with a paper clip, but it's a strong message that I'm disengaging and won't keep fighting. I have never locked her out of our room.
Not a perfect solution, but better than the alternative given she can't control her anger and emotions. Occasionally, if she knows she is at fault, she will calm down, unlock the door after I've fallen asleep, and get in the guest room bed with me and sleep there.
So, when she is upset about something, your response is to completely disengage, then wonder why she continues to escalate? She wants to talk to you. It doesn't sound to me like either of you are good at controlling your emotions. It just looks different when you feel out of control.
Anonymous wrote:DH here. DW can always outlast me in a fight. No matter how exhausted she is, she'll keep yelling, and keep escalating. Not great at controlling her emotions. Best case scenario is she cries herself to sleep.
On the flip side, if I'm pissed at her, I'll go sleep in the guest room, and lock the door. Sure, she could (and does occasionally) unlock it with a paper clip, but it's a strong message that I'm disengaging and won't keep fighting. I have never locked her out of our room.
Not a perfect solution, but better than the alternative given she can't control her anger and emotions. Occasionally, if she knows she is at fault, she will calm down, unlock the door after I've fallen asleep, and get in the guest room bed with me and sleep there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I caught him having an affair, he had a choice the nanny suite or a hotel. You think that is out of line? If he wants to see the kids he should stay in the suite, if he wants to flee the kids go to a hotel.
I never made him stay in the suite, I just would not allow him in my room.
This is OP, and yes, I do think it's out of line. Obviously, so was the affair! IMO it would be fine if you negotiated with him to stay in the nanny suite otherwise you will leave the home or file for separation or whatever. In that case, he is agreeing to it because the alternative is worse. But neither the house nor the kids belong to you alone, so you can't demand that he sleep in the nanny suite if he doesn't want to, nor can you say "if he wants to see the kids, he must...."
Anonymous wrote:We never kick the other person out. Once in a blue moon, the angry person is the one who will choose to sleep on the couch.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I caught him having an affair, he had a choice the nanny suite or a hotel. You think that is out of line? If he wants to see the kids he should stay in the suite, if he wants to flee the kids go to a hotel.
I never made him stay in the suite, I just would not allow him in my room.
NP, if I caught my DH having an affair, no way would he be allowed in my room. And yes, I would claim it was MY room, MY bed, MY house. He would lose all ownership rights by sticking his junk in someone else.
Property and family law doesn't work that way over a garden-variety affair.
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone else agree that this is not acceptable? I cannot imagine telling my husband he can't come into a room in his house or sleep in his bed. I would also have a good long laugh if he tried this on me. It's a shared house. YOU can always choose to leave, but you cannot make the other person leave. This is absent physical violence, which we've never experienced, though we've had plenty of arguments over our 20 years together. I'm always astounded by the idea that someone would accept this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I caught him having an affair, he had a choice the nanny suite or a hotel. You think that is out of line? If he wants to see the kids he should stay in the suite, if he wants to flee the kids go to a hotel.
I never made him stay in the suite, I just would not allow him in my room.
NP, if I caught my DH having an affair, no way would he be allowed in my room. And yes, I would claim it was MY room, MY bed, MY house. He would lose all ownership rights by sticking his junk in someone else.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I caught him having an affair, he had a choice the nanny suite or a hotel. You think that is out of line? If he wants to see the kids he should stay in the suite, if he wants to flee the kids go to a hotel.
I never made him stay in the suite, I just would not allow him in my room.
This is OP, and yes, I do think it's out of line. Obviously, so was the affair! IMO it would be fine if you negotiated with him to stay in the nanny suite otherwise you will leave the home or file for separation or whatever. In that case, he is agreeing to it because the alternative is worse. But neither the house nor the kids belong to you alone, so you can't demand that he sleep in the nanny suite if he doesn't want to, nor can you say "if he wants to see the kids, he must...."
I have to say that it would take a lot of guts to file for separation the day you found out about an affair. I think most people need a few hours or days to process things. And it might not be something that you want to tell your children about. They are much more likely to notice the fact that they live in a hotel now than that dad has been on a business trip for a few days.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I caught him having an affair, he had a choice the nanny suite or a hotel. You think that is out of line? If he wants to see the kids he should stay in the suite, if he wants to flee the kids go to a hotel.
I never made him stay in the suite, I just would not allow him in my room.
NP, if I caught my DH having an affair, no way would he be allowed in my room. And yes, I would claim it was MY room, MY bed, MY house. He would lose all ownership rights by sticking his junk in someone else.