Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You can take actions to broaden ones experience and improve critical thinking by doing puzzles, talking, exploring and reading. That may improve tests over many years.
That differs from learning the test which may or may not be possible and is definitely not ethical. Of course, if you had a copy of the CogAT, WISC etc, you could coach the answers. This will have the effect of invalidating the test (if you are caught), or meaningless if you are not caught
You keep saying "get a copy of the test". Where do you get such copy? The prep materials that you buy do not have a copy of the test. They have questions similar in structure to those on the test. How are these puzzles different from the ones you do at home? I'm asking a very clear and direct question, but you're not giving an answer. Instead, you're providing a lecture.
Not being ethical is certainly not illegal. We live in a time where feelings have become the ethical standard.
It is illegal. These tests are copyrighted and tightly controlled and only sold to those with certain qualifications. You have to sign all sorts of user agreements etc. and there are penalties for violating.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You can take actions to broaden ones experience and improve critical thinking by doing puzzles, talking, exploring and reading. That may improve tests over many years.
That differs from learning the test which may or may not be possible and is definitely not ethical. Of course, if you had a copy of the CogAT, WISC etc, you could coach the answers. This will have the effect of invalidating the test (if you are caught), or meaningless if you are not caught
You keep saying "get a copy of the test". Where do you get such copy? The prep materials that you buy do not have a copy of the test. They have questions similar in structure to those on the test. How are these puzzles different from the ones you do at home? I'm asking a very clear and direct question, but you're not giving an answer. Instead, you're providing a lecture.
Not being ethical is certainly not illegal. We live in a time where feelings have become the ethical standard.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You can take actions to broaden ones experience and improve critical thinking by doing puzzles, talking, exploring and reading. That may improve tests over many years.
That differs from learning the test which may or may not be possible and is definitely not ethical. Of course, if you had a copy of the CogAT, WISC etc, you could coach the answers. This will have the effect of invalidating the test (if you are caught), or meaningless if you are not caught
You keep saying "get a copy of the test". Where do you get such copy? The prep materials that you buy do not have a copy of the test. They have questions similar in structure to those on the test. How are these puzzles different from the ones you do at home? I'm asking a very clear and direct question, but you're not giving an answer. Instead, you're providing a lecture.
Not being ethical is certainly not illegal. We live in a time where feelings have become the ethical standard.
You are f*cking nuts. Seriously.
You clearly have limited cognitive ability. You and your foul shouts belong in the cave.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You can take actions to broaden ones experience and improve critical thinking by doing puzzles, talking, exploring and reading. That may improve tests over many years.
That differs from learning the test which may or may not be possible and is definitely not ethical. Of course, if you had a copy of the CogAT, WISC etc, you could coach the answers. This will have the effect of invalidating the test (if you are caught), or meaningless if you are not caught
You keep saying "get a copy of the test". Where do you get such copy? The prep materials that you buy do not have a copy of the test. They have questions similar in structure to those on the test. How are these puzzles different from the ones you do at home? I'm asking a very clear and direct question, but you're not giving an answer. Instead, you're providing a lecture.
Not being ethical is certainly not illegal. We live in a time where feelings have become the ethical standard.
You are f*cking nuts. Seriously.
You clearly have limited cognitive ability. You and your foul shouts belong in the cave. [/quote
Actually, I kind of agree. PP is f****ng nuts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You can take actions to broaden ones experience and improve critical thinking by doing puzzles, talking, exploring and reading. That may improve tests over many years.
That differs from learning the test which may or may not be possible and is definitely not ethical. Of course, if you had a copy of the CogAT, WISC etc, you could coach the answers. This will have the effect of invalidating the test (if you are caught), or meaningless if you are not caught
You keep saying "get a copy of the test". Where do you get such copy? The prep materials that you buy do not have a copy of the test. They have questions similar in structure to those on the test. How are these puzzles different from the ones you do at home? I'm asking a very clear and direct question, but you're not giving an answer. Instead, you're providing a lecture.
Not being ethical is certainly not illegal. We live in a time where feelings have become the ethical standard.
You are f*cking nuts. Seriously.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You can take actions to broaden ones experience and improve critical thinking by doing puzzles, talking, exploring and reading. That may improve tests over many years.
That differs from learning the test which may or may not be possible and is definitely not ethical. Of course, if you had a copy of the CogAT, WISC etc, you could coach the answers. This will have the effect of invalidating the test (if you are caught), or meaningless if you are not caught
You keep saying "get a copy of the test". Where do you get such copy? The prep materials that you buy do not have a copy of the test. They have questions similar in structure to those on the test. How are these puzzles different from the ones you do at home? I'm asking a very clear and direct question, but you're not giving an answer. Instead, you're providing a lecture.
Not being ethical is certainly not illegal. We live in a time where feelings have become the ethical standard.
.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You can take actions to broaden ones experience and improve critical thinking by doing puzzles, talking, exploring and reading. That may improve tests over many years.
That differs from learning the test which may or may not be possible and is definitely not ethical. Of course, if you had a copy of the CogAT, WISC etc, you could coach the answers. This will have the effect of invalidating the test (if you are caught), or meaningless if you are not caught
You keep saying "get a copy of the test". Where do you get such copy? The prep materials that you buy do not have a copy of the test. They have questions similar in structure to those on the test. How are these puzzles different from the ones you do at home? I'm asking a very clear and direct question, but you're not giving an answer. Instead, you're providing a lecture.
Not being ethical is certainly not illegal. We live in a time where feelings have become the ethical standard.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You can take actions to broaden ones experience and improve critical thinking by doing puzzles, talking, exploring and reading. That may improve tests over many years.
That differs from learning the test which may or may not be possible and is definitely not ethical. Of course, if you had a copy of the CogAT, WISC etc, you could coach the answers. This will have the effect of invalidating the test (if you are caught), or meaningless if you are not caught
You keep saying "get a copy of the test". Where do you get such copy? The prep materials that you buy do not have a copy of the test. They have questions similar in structure to those on the test. How are these puzzles different from the ones you do at home? I'm asking a very clear and direct question, but you're not giving an answer. Instead, you're providing a lecture.
Not being ethical is certainly not illegal. We live in a time where feelings have become the ethical standard.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You can take actions to broaden ones experience and improve critical thinking by doing puzzles, talking, exploring and reading. That may improve tests over many years.
That differs from learning the test which may or may not be possible and is definitely not ethical. Of course, if you had a copy of the CogAT, WISC etc, you could coach the answers. This will have the effect of invalidating the test (if you are caught), or meaningless if you are not caught
You keep saying "get a copy of the test". Where do you get such copy? The prep materials that you buy do not have a copy of the test. They have questions similar in structure to those on the test. How are these puzzles different from the ones you do at home? I'm asking a very clear and direct question, but you're not giving an answer. Instead, you're providing a lecture.
Not being ethical is certainly not illegal. We live in a time where feelings have become the ethical standard.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You can take actions to broaden ones experience and improve critical thinking by doing puzzles, talking, exploring and reading. That may improve tests over many years.
That differs from learning the test which may or may not be possible and is definitely not ethical. Of course, if you had a copy of the CogAT, WISC etc, you could coach the answers. This will have the effect of invalidating the test (if you are caught), or meaningless if you are not caught
You keep saying "get a copy of the test". Where do you get such copy? The prep materials that you buy do not have a copy of the test. They have questions similar in structure to those on the test. How are these puzzles different from the ones you do at home? I'm asking a very clear and direct question, but you're not giving an answer. Instead, you're providing a lecture.
Not being ethical is certainly not illegal. We live in a time where feelings have become the ethical standard.
Anonymous wrote:You can take actions to broaden ones experience and improve critical thinking by doing puzzles, talking, exploring and reading. That may improve tests over many years.
That differs from learning the test which may or may not be possible and is definitely not ethical. Of course, if you had a copy of the CogAT, WISC etc, you could coach the answers. This will have the effect of invalidating the test (if you are caught), or meaningless if you are not caught
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Mensa sends you a practice test, so you can take that before you take the real thing.
Should your kids prep for their IQ test?
What if the kids like the puzzle like games that are similar to the IQ test, and they play with them without you prompting?
Absolutely not. As a psychologist if I found out the child prepped the test would be invalid!
I don't understands why? The kid won't have access to THE TEST, but just some maybe similar questions. Also, for example, the SB has lessons from fables on it. I've been reading/teaching my kids fables since they were little. I'm not prepping them. If they took the SB, provided it still had this section, the kid has to come up with his/her own lesson. No matter how many fables I told them, if the didn't have it in them, they wouldn't answer correctly.
Because the test is designed to measure a child’s response to novel stimuli and questions. You can't compare a child who practices to their peers (test norms). Practice effects significantly reduces the validity of IQ tests as the scores are not reflective of their true intellectual ability thus, not valid.
You're still not making sense. Different people have different amounts of knowledge. There are endless indirect activities that increase a child's iq, and some parents have knowledge and access to those activities, whereas others don't.
Yes, but there’s a clear difference between indirect and direct prepping. It’s one thing to provide an enriched environment, by reading to your child, doing puzzles/games, etc over the course of their life. That is completely acceptable and encouraged. All parents ideally should be doing this. It is a completely other thing to get a copy of the test your child will take and practice the answers to those questions that they will inevitably see.