And that taught him what? Mom runs his life. If he stayed and got the citation maybe he actually would have learned something. It is not a parents job to eliminate anything bad that can happen to kids. It is parents job to teach them to make good choices on their own and learn from their mistakes.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
My friend did this:
If her kid was going to a party, both parents ALWAYS drove the kid (even after the kid had her own car). Even though she would first verify (WITH the parent!) that there would be a parent in the home of the party, there was often NO adult at the house when the party started. So they went home.
Even parents who you knew and trusted will lie to you.
Your job:
Trust, but verify. Always.
+1
We call the parents of the teen throwing the party.
Once we did that and they said they would be home. At dropoff, I had a bad/"off" sensation, so a half-hour later I texted DC and told him he needed to leave. I picked him up. He was furious.
Several hours later, the cops busted the party and issued a bunch of citations.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t think what my parents did was objectively right, especially by today’s standards, but I’ve turned out well and never got into trouble. I don’t recall having any particular rules. No curfew, I was allowed to work PT during HS (some of my friends weren’t), I traveled on some weekends for my sport by myself or with my sibling (like we would drive 4-5 hours away and stay in a seedy hotel by ourselves (at 16 and 14). Little academic pressure, never asked about homework. In retrospect all a little strange but I managed to get myself into a top SLAC (which they paid for), and later an ivy grad school (which I paid for).
This was my life exactly.
I was an easy kid and a good kid naturally. They didn't need tons of rules because I always did the right thing naturally. I was the teen who was always the DD for my friends because I took not drinking before 21 very seriously.(Well, at least until college)
They had no idea of what classes I was taking or my grades until it was report card time. I'd hand it over and get the standard, "well done! Where would you like to go eat for your celebratory dinner?" Their college guidance/interest was pretty much just writing the check for the application fee when I asked for one. They allowed me to go on an epic spring break road trip to tour colleges up the East Coast with my (coed) friends.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the main thing my parents did right was to know me well enough to understand how best to supervise me. That meant that they did not impose many hard and fast "rules" (like curfews) and they recognized that they could trust my judgment. Because they did, I developed even better judgment. A different sort of kid would have required a different sort of parenting.
I think this is the very best approach.
Anonymous wrote:
My friend did this:
If her kid was going to a party, both parents ALWAYS drove the kid (even after the kid had her own car). Even though she would first verify (WITH the parent!) that there would be a parent in the home of the party, there was often NO adult at the house when the party started. So they went home.
Even parents who you knew and trusted will lie to you.
Your job:
Trust, but verify. Always.
Anonymous wrote:I don’t think what my parents did was objectively right, especially by today’s standards, but I’ve turned out well and never got into trouble. I don’t recall having any particular rules. No curfew, I was allowed to work PT during HS (some of my friends weren’t), I traveled on some weekends for my sport by myself or with my sibling (like we would drive 4-5 hours away and stay in a seedy hotel by ourselves (at 16 and 14). Little academic pressure, never asked about homework. In retrospect all a little strange but I managed to get myself into a top SLAC (which they paid for), and later an ivy grad school (which I paid for).
(Well, at least until college)
Anonymous wrote:I think the main thing my parents did right was to know me well enough to understand how best to supervise me. That meant that they did not impose many hard and fast "rules" (like curfews) and they recognized that they could trust my judgment. Because they did, I developed even better judgment. A different sort of kid would have required a different sort of parenting.
Anonymous wrote:I had no curfew and my parents had one basic rule. I needed to keep them informed where I was, who I was with and what I was doing. The logic was that if I didn’t want to tell them, I probably shouldn’t be doing it. Lying would have resulted in things like a curfew or certain activities being off limits (going to college house parties to see punk bands).
The only other rule I recall was not to drive drunk / intoxicated and not to ride with anyone who was drunk / intoxicated. I always knew I could call them.
I grew up in a college town with plenty of access to alcohol and drugs and I didn’t drink or smoke until college. I hung out late at night in the basement of bars or in college rental houses watching bands play and was friends with “bad kids”. Yet I was first chair for my instrument, valedictorian, 3 varsity sports and a club president. I got a great scholarship to a private university. If you had looked at me in high school with my dyed hair and Hot Topic fake Goth / punk clothes, you would not have guessed I was actually more like Tracy Flick in Election than the stoner/ burnout I looked like. I am glad my parents supported me being me while still helping me keep my eye o the prize - college, scholarship, etc.