Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
MS teacher here.
I think a lot of this debate comes back to what you believe about your role as a teacher. For me (and many others), that role extends beyond the bell. If a student needs extra help and is willing to stay after school to seek that help, many of us are happy to provide it. The one-on-one or small group time allows opportunities to better get to know our students and build relationships, and it helps build in our students a sense of responsibility and ownership of their learning.
IMO, those who seem to see teaching as strictly bell-to-bell and feel the need to consult regulations for something like giving an hour of time once a week to support struggling students really make the rest of us look bad and should re-examine why they're still in this profession.
So if you are a teacher with a family you should reconsider teaching? Sorry not everyone can stay an hour every day, even some days. There are plenty of great teachers that teach bell to bell. Don't let Hollywood fool you that you have to put in insane hours to be a good teacher. 1.5 hours is enough for kids to learn in class. Differentiate your lessons so you can help those that need it. When I see teachers staying 2 hours past each night I honestly think they are bad teachers, it doesn't need to be that difficult.
I agree. Since when did leaving on time become a bad thing?
We have found that this happens in elementary school and lessens as students move through MS and HS. In our experience high school teachers provided very little, if any differentiation.
Anonymous wrote:MS teacher here.
I think a lot of this debate comes back to what you believe about your role as a teacher. For me (and many others), that role extends beyond the bell. If a student needs extra help and is willing to stay after school to seek that help, many of us are happy to provide it. The one-on-one or small group time allows opportunities to better get to know our students and build relationships, and it helps build in our students a sense of responsibility and ownership of their learning.
IMO, those who seem to see teaching as strictly bell-to-bell and feel the need to consult regulations for something like giving an hour of time once a week to support struggling students really make the rest of us look bad and should re-examine why they're still in this profession.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MS teacher here.
I think a lot of this debate comes back to what you believe about your role as a teacher. For me (and many others), that role extends beyond the bell. If a student needs extra help and is willing to stay after school to seek that help, many of us are happy to provide it. The one-on-one or small group time allows opportunities to better get to know our students and build relationships, and it helps build in our students a sense of responsibility and ownership of their learning.
IMO, those who seem to see teaching as strictly bell-to-bell and feel the need to consult regulations for something like giving an hour of time once a week to support struggling students really make the rest of us look bad and should re-examine why they're still in this profession.
So if you are a teacher with a family you should reconsider teaching? Sorry not everyone can stay an hour every day, even some days. There are plenty of great teachers that teach bell to bell. Don't let Hollywood fool you that you have to put in insane hours to be a good teacher. 1.5 hours is enough for kids to learn in class. Differentiate your lessons so you can help those that need it. When I see teachers staying 2 hours past each night I honestly think they are bad teachers, it doesn't need to be that difficult.
Anonymous wrote:MS teacher here.
I think a lot of this debate comes back to what you believe about your role as a teacher. For me (and many others), that role extends beyond the bell. If a student needs extra help and is willing to stay after school to seek that help, many of us are happy to provide it. The one-on-one or small group time allows opportunities to better get to know our students and build relationships, and it helps build in our students a sense of responsibility and ownership of their learning.
IMO, those who seem to see teaching as strictly bell-to-bell and feel the need to consult regulations for something like giving an hour of time once a week to support struggling students really make the rest of us look bad and should re-examine why they're still in this profession.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MS teacher here.
I think a lot of this debate comes back to what you believe about your role as a teacher. For me (and many others), that role extends beyond the bell. If a student needs extra help and is willing to stay after school to seek that help, many of us are happy to provide it. The one-on-one or small group time allows opportunities to better get to know our students and build relationships, and it helps build in our students a sense of responsibility and ownership of their learning.
IMO, those who seem to see teaching as strictly bell-to-bell and feel the need to consult regulations for something like giving an hour of time once a week to support struggling students really make the rest of us look bad and should re-examine why they're still in this profession.
What you describe, being willing to stay after school and tutor, sounds like a choice not a requirement. Few teachers I know go bell to bell. Many of us put in “extra hours”. I teach in an elementary school and left st 5:00 today. That was nine hours of being busy, take away lunch. Usually I leave around 4:00. I go in for the occasional morning meeting, help with an after school event, etc. I met with a parent after school yesterday. My role extends beyond the bell, but I am choosing to do what I do. I’m not being required to do things after school on a regular basis. That’s different. Some people have their own children to pick up from daycare after work. Are they making us look bad because they have to leave at 3:45 to pick their kid up from daycare?
Anonymous wrote:MS teacher here.
I think a lot of this debate comes back to what you believe about your role as a teacher. For me (and many others), that role extends beyond the bell. If a student needs extra help and is willing to stay after school to seek that help, many of us are happy to provide it. The one-on-one or small group time allows opportunities to better get to know our students and build relationships, and it helps build in our students a sense of responsibility and ownership of their learning.
IMO, those who seem to see teaching as strictly bell-to-bell and feel the need to consult regulations for something like giving an hour of time once a week to support struggling students really make the rest of us look bad and should re-examine why they're still in this profession.
Anonymous wrote:Our former principal tried to guilt us into doing after school clubs at our Title One school. I told her that at my son's school, 90% of the clubs were run by parents. My principal said that the poor children never have any chance to do extracurricular activities. I am sick of people expecting teachers to be the saviors all of the time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our former principal tried to guilt us into doing after school clubs at our Title One school. I told her that at my son's school, 90% of the clubs were run by parents. My principal said that the poor children never have any chance to do extracurricular activities. I am sick of people expecting teachers to be the saviors all of the time.
most FCPS elementaries contract out clubs to vendors and the students pay the vendors directly. The PTA might run a lego club or something similar.