Anonymous wrote:I would not be comfortable with that, given the staff member's experience with the child. Not because of molestation concerns, but because of concerns that the child could be violent or rough with the smaller, younger kids. I would ask what the gym's policy is on size/age restrictions in the childcare setting.
NP here. This is my thought too. I wouldn't have even thought of molestation but would immediately have thought of this much larger child knocking over younger kids. That is a concern whether or not special needs are involved.
OP, it's easy for others to come on here and post, "So don't use the child care!" As a paying gym member, you should have the option to use the child care if that is the only way you are going to get to use this gym. The same goes for the parent of that older/larger kid, for sure. But clearly the situation doesn't seem safe, not just to you but to the person paid to be with those kids. Big red flag.
I would not return my kid to this child care until I had e-mailed the manager, with a copy to the corporate offices if this is a chain, and asked -- very calmly -- if there is an upper age limit for child care use. I would say that you witnessed a child who appeared to be X years old running in the child care area among children Y years old and are concerned for safety. If you feel you can say that the attendant would not enter the area out of fear of this child, say so, but the attendant frankly may deny it to the management -- he or she likely is not paid much and needs this job, and may fear losing it if management knows what was said to you in a moment of fear.
I would not bring SN into it, frankly; if the child is too old for the child care's rules, the child is too old. If there are NO rules, I'd give the gym one chance to set some age limits (bearing in mind they'll affect you, eventually, too). , Call some other local gyms and find out their rules for child care; that gives you something to tell your gym about what others do. Probably the gym is going to be worried that it will be slammed by the parent for discriminating against an SN child, but size of the child does matter, from a safety perspective. Even if the kid weren't SN (and you don't know for sure if the child is SN), a child too old and large for a baby/toddler "room" should not be there. And yes, going to the gym at times when you don't need child care may be an option but it's not one that all of us have, all the time.
What did you say to the child care attendant at the time? That person needs to be very strongly encouraged to report to management that he or she is physically afraid of this child.
I get that the parent of this child probably needs a break FAR more than any of us, but putting an older child in that situation is going to end badly for that child or other, smaller kids, and the gym needs to realize that. Enforcing a straightforward age limit would be the way to go.
If you misjudged the child's age and the child is just large but IS still within the age limits -- you have to make the call on whether to stay. It's possible that the attendant is not at all experienced or trained in dealing with kids, and this one child isn't that big a problem but the attendant is just overreacting. You may want to observe some more -- or you may never end up again at the gym when the other kid is present, so it would be moot.