Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:people need to understand that when TJ parents say "if you don't have a child at TJ, you don't know what TJ is truly like" -- it has nothing to do with TJ. TJ parents wouldn't claim to understand what it is like to have a child at a high school their child doesn't attend . . . so why do others think it's acceptable to say they know TJ if they don't have children there? The fact that you may be subsidizing it also doesn't mean you know what it's like to have a child go to school there (you can say you don't like subsidizing it -- that's fair game). If you think that we are all looking down on you, I think it's more a factor of you feeling inferior than TJ parents feeling superior.
Actually they do that all the time, even when they only have kids at TJ, but please keep putting yourself and your kids on a pedestal. It’s amusing to watch the mix of arrogance and hypocrisy at work.
LOL, just stop it already. I have one at TJ and one at base school. I don't have one on a pedestal and one lower. Your insecurities are showing and it isn't pretty.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:people need to understand that when TJ parents say "if you don't have a child at TJ, you don't know what TJ is truly like" -- it has nothing to do with TJ. TJ parents wouldn't claim to understand what it is like to have a child at a high school their child doesn't attend . . . so why do others think it's acceptable to say they know TJ if they don't have children there? The fact that you may be subsidizing it also doesn't mean you know what it's like to have a child go to school there (you can say you don't like subsidizing it -- that's fair game). If you think that we are all looking down on you, I think it's more a factor of you feeling inferior than TJ parents feeling superior.
Actually they do that all the time, even when they only have kids at TJ, but please keep putting yourself and your kids on a pedestal. It’s amusing to watch the mix of arrogance and hypocrisy at work.
Anonymous wrote:people need to understand that when TJ parents say "if you don't have a child at TJ, you don't know what TJ is truly like" -- it has nothing to do with TJ. TJ parents wouldn't claim to understand what it is like to have a child at a high school their child doesn't attend . . . so why do others think it's acceptable to say they know TJ if they don't have children there? The fact that you may be subsidizing it also doesn't mean you know what it's like to have a child go to school there (you can say you don't like subsidizing it -- that's fair game). If you think that we are all looking down on you, I think it's more a factor of you feeling inferior than TJ parents feeling superior.
Anonymous wrote:There are plenty of people with connections to TJ who haven’t had kids there, and everyone in the area is subsidizing it one way or another. This “it’s a TJ thing, you wouldn’t understand” attitude rubs a lot of folks the wrong way, especially knowing there seem to many TJ parents and students who look down on everyone else based on their own misperceptions.