Anonymous wrote:Thanks, everyone. One additional question: Did you ever feel as though the school was catering *too* much to your kid? In other words, was your kid getting a sense of entitlement? We really want to balance making sure our kid gets a high quality education with trying to avoid her feeling a sense of entitlement. I know it's really hard to do, and that there are plenty of entitled kids in public schools, but I wonder if it's a risk in having such small class sizes.
Anonymous wrote:DD went from a W feeder school in MoCo to private. I agree with many of the comments in this thread.
If you’re considering making a switch, look closely at they type of private school- they are not all created equal and the ones that everyone seems desperate for their kids to attend may not be best for your DC.
The biggest difference for DD:
-Smaller classes means more attention and ability for teachers to do more during the day (15 kids in a class instead of 25-35)
-Less chaotic environment- because the school isn’t bursting at the seams, the environment is less stressful (especially in the halls and in the lunch room).
-More hands-on instruction and practical application of concepts. Learning by doing is an everyday occurrence. In public school in was an unusual occurrence (great teachers but not nearly enough time or resources).
-More specialty instruction. Instead of having one PE teacher glossing over a few sports (again, great teachers but time a resources were lacking), DD has a swim instructor, volleyball instructors, etc. These are people who have years of experience teaching the sport to players at all levels. She gets a very good beginning level understanding of the sport (and has PE four days out of five instead of one day out of five).
-Environment of achievement. At the beginning of the year DD commented that one of the reasons she enjoys her school so much is because everyone wants to be there and work hard. HUGE difference from her public school. She doesn’t have to deal with always being seated next to the class clown because she was always on task and “balanced the group”.
Biggest difference for me and DH:
-Feedback- we have an hour for parent conferences and the feedback is thoughtful and meaningful. Her teachers are highly responsive to our questions and go above and beyond to help. DH and I were tired of attending conferences that lasted five minutes only to be told that DD was so fabulous and they had no practical feedback. Yes, she’s great it she’s not perfect and there is ALWAYS something that can be done better.
-Community- as strange as it may seem, DD’s private (that draws kids from all over DC, VA and MD) feels more like a community than DD’s public ES. That obviously won’t be the case at every private but DD’s school focuses on building community in ways that her public school didn’t (or couldn’t).
Our family is fortunate that DD was accepted to the school that we felt would be the best fit for her and we are relieved that the school has surpassed our expectations. I understand that it doesn’t work out so well for every student (and family) but these are the biggest differences we’ve experienced. Good luck to you, OP with whatever path you choose.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thanks, this is really helpful. We are looking at private, but haven't made a final decision yet. DH doesn't have any experience with private school, whereas I do (though it was only for HS). These insights help frame our thinking!
thumb up for private school over public school
My son who just recently graduated from college could have attended public Langley HS. Instead his mother sent him to Sidwell and it was the best thing we did for him. Private school taught him critical thinking which is something they taught in public school. My daughter didn't get accepted into Sidwell so she attended Langley HS and don't get me wrong, Langley HS is a good school but it is NOT Sidwell. She was a good student at Langley HS but she is really struggling at UVA.
my 2c
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My child learned actual content, not just reading strategies over and over and over again. He had social studies all year long as well as science. They didn't alternate like in public school. In science, they had to write up labs and then actually did them. He was taught actual grammar and received a grade for it. He was taught vocabulary and spelling finally counted in his writing. He was taught how to write and then his writing was critiqued and he was able to make changes to it before it was due. His teacher did this through writing conferences with each student and comments on Google classroom. He took a foreign language and it was a regular class. There was none of this ridiculous redoing of assignments and tests. A test or quiz was given and the date was known in advance. If you didn't study and did poorly, oh well. Do better next time. He teachers expected a lot more from him. He got straight As in public school and a year and a half later, still gets mostly Bs and Cs and I'm happy about it. Public school parents who think their child is doing well live in Fantasyland. Oh and he was in the highest group in math in public school (and got straight As) and he scored in the 70% percentile in basic math skills when he started private school. A tutor and myself are now catching him up on basic math since the Common Core crap math he learned is useless. Oh and the grading scale is harder.
What school district? If my kid got all As, I would question it in a minute whether public or private. Back at home only hardworking smart kids got all As- maybe 15 kids out of 800.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My child learned actual content, not just reading strategies over and over and over again. He had social studies all year long as well as science. They didn't alternate like in public school. In science, they had to write up labs and then actually did them. He was taught actual grammar and received a grade for it. He was taught vocabulary and spelling finally counted in his writing. He was taught how to write and then his writing was critiqued and he was able to make changes to it before it was due. His teacher did this through writing conferences with each student and comments on Google classroom. He took a foreign language and it was a regular class. There was none of this ridiculous redoing of assignments and tests. A test or quiz was given and the date was known in advance. If you didn't study and did poorly, oh well. Do better next time. He teachers expected a lot more from him. He got straight As in public school and a year and a half later, still gets mostly Bs and Cs and I'm happy about it. Public school parents who think their child is doing well live in Fantasyland. Oh and he was in the highest group in math in public school (and got straight As) and he scored in the 70% percentile in basic math skills when he started private school. A tutor and myself are now catching him up on basic math since the Common Core crap math he learned is useless. Oh and the grading scale is harder.
My kids attend public school and they have social studies and science all year long. I'm shocked that there are any schools that actually alternate these. What state are you in?
Anonymous wrote:Thanks, this is really helpful. We are looking at private, but haven't made a final decision yet. DH doesn't have any experience with private school, whereas I do (though it was only for HS). These insights help frame our thinking!
Anonymous wrote:DD went from a W feeder school in MoCo to private. I agree with many of the comments in this thread.
If you’re considering making a switch, look closely at they type of private school- they are not all created equal and the ones that everyone seems desperate for their kids to attend may not be best for your DC.
The biggest difference for DD:
-Smaller classes means more attention and ability for teachers to do more during the day (15 kids in a class instead of 25-35)
-Less chaotic environment- because the school isn’t bursting at the seams, the environment is less stressful (especially in the halls and in the lunch room).
-More hands-on instruction and practical application of concepts. Learning by doing is an everyday occurrence. In public school in was an unusual occurrence (great teachers but not nearly enough time or resources).
-More specialty instruction. Instead of having one PE teacher glossing over a few sports (again, great teachers but time a resources were lacking), DD has a swim instructor, volleyball instructors, etc. These are people who have years of experience teaching the sport to players at all levels. She gets a very good beginning level understanding of the sport (and has PE four days out of five instead of one day out of five).
-Environment of achievement. At the beginning of the year DD commented that one of the reasons she enjoys her school so much is because everyone wants to be there and work hard. HUGE difference from her public school. She doesn’t have to deal with always being seated next to the class clown because she was always on task and “balanced the group”.
Biggest difference for me and DH:
-Feedback- we have an hour for parent conferences and the feedback is thoughtful and meaningful. Her teachers are highly responsive to our questions and go above and beyond to help. DH and I were tired of attending conferences that lasted five minutes only to be told that DD was so fabulous and they had no practical feedback. Yes, she’s great it she’s not perfect and there is ALWAYS something that can be done better.
-Community- as strange as it may seem, DD’s private (that draws kids from all over DC, VA and MD) feels more like a community than DD’s public ES. That obviously won’t be the case at every private but DD’s school focuses on building community in ways that her public school didn’t (or couldn’t).
Our family is fortunate that DD was accepted to the school that we felt would be the best fit for her and we are relieved that the school has surpassed our expectations. I understand that it doesn’t work out so well for every student (and family) but these are the biggest differences we’ve experienced. Good luck to you, OP with whatever path you choose.
Anonymous wrote:My child learned actual content, not just reading strategies over and over and over again. He had social studies all year long as well as science. They didn't alternate like in public school. In science, they had to write up labs and then actually did them. He was taught actual grammar and received a grade for it. He was taught vocabulary and spelling finally counted in his writing. He was taught how to write and then his writing was critiqued and he was able to make changes to it before it was due. His teacher did this through writing conferences with each student and comments on Google classroom. He took a foreign language and it was a regular class. There was none of this ridiculous redoing of assignments and tests. A test or quiz was given and the date was known in advance. If you didn't study and did poorly, oh well. Do better next time. He teachers expected a lot more from him. He got straight As in public school and a year and a half later, still gets mostly Bs and Cs and I'm happy about it. Public school parents who think their child is doing well live in Fantasyland. Oh and he was in the highest group in math in public school (and got straight As) and he scored in the 70% percentile in basic math skills when he started private school. A tutor and myself are now catching him up on basic math since the Common Core crap math he learned is useless. Oh and the grading scale is harder.