Anonymous wrote:Believe me, if I had my heart set on Yale, for example, and one of my classmates got into Harvard SCEA and wanted to “benchmark his success” by applying to Yale also, even though he had no intention of going there, and he was the only one accepted to Yale out of my entire school, you can be darned sure I would remember that and think he was a jerk whenever his name came up forever after.
Anonymous wrote:I am surprised that the counselors allowed it. Had a kid in our class who got into HYP during SCEA and wanted to apply to all ivies during RD - counselor put a stop to it and only allowed one IVY as kid wanted to compare financial aid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm curious OP - why continue on with RDs at other institutions if you got in SCEA Harvard? It's expensive, time-consuming, nail-biting, an enormous hassle and a stressor on your kid. I don't get it.
I see nothing wrong with a successful senior benchmarking that success by applying to other Top Ivies.
That's the kid who will end up without close friends and other families for future recommendations and network. What people don't think about is greediness leads them to be viewed as selfish, inconsiderate and either not very smart about or blundering their social collateral. With all the early hooks, seldom would most view entry as the sign of a senior being successful purely on academic merit so what is that benchmark worth? What will be noted and remembered is the lack of character. Families who do this are forever remarked upon as lacking graciousness and not to be trusted. And in your case it didn't work so your DC's H success is not going to be attributed to merit at all on her part. The most successful families we know do not do this.
Trust me, no one will even remember, let alone nurse a grudge. Do you remember who applied to which college back in High school? If you do, I would think you were a bit psycho.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm curious OP - why continue on with RDs at other institutions if you got in SCEA Harvard? It's expensive, time-consuming, nail-biting, an enormous hassle and a stressor on your kid. I don't get it.
I see nothing wrong with a successful senior benchmarking that success by applying to other Top Ivies.
That's the kid who will end up without close friends and other families for future recommendations and network. What people don't think about is greediness leads them to be viewed as selfish, inconsiderate and either not very smart about or blundering their social collateral. With all the early hooks, seldom would most view entry as the sign of a senior being successful purely on academic merit so what is that benchmark worth? What will be noted and remembered is the lack of character. Families who do this are forever remarked upon as lacking graciousness and not to be trusted. And in your case it didn't work so your DC's H success is not going to be attributed to merit at all on her part. The most successful families we know do not do this.
Anonymous wrote:I'm curious OP - why continue on with RDs at other institutions if you got in SCEA Harvard? It's expensive, time-consuming, nail-biting, an enormous hassle and a stressor on your kid. I don't get it.
Anonymous wrote:Waitlisted at Williams and Bowdoin
Rejected at MIT, Pomona, Swarthmore
1600 SAT 4.93 GPA Slew of national distinctions
We're holding up just fine, but this year seems brutal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm curious OP - why continue on with RDs at other institutions if you got in SCEA Harvard? It's expensive, time-consuming, nail-biting, an enormous hassle and a stressor on your kid. I don't get it.
I see nothing wrong with a successful senior benchmarking that success by applying to other Top Ivies.
Anonymous wrote:I'm curious OP - why continue on with RDs at other institutions if you got in SCEA Harvard? It's expensive, time-consuming, nail-biting, an enormous hassle and a stressor on your kid. I don't get it.