Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Didn't we just have a thread about JKLM kids who can't get into private because it's too hard? They have to compete against the entire DMV and they're not as specially snowflake as their parents thought?
Seriously, we just had this thread last week. The reason to enroll in private now is because you can't get in when MS rolls around. Your child just can't compete.
I thought it wasn't because "it's too hard", but because they have fewer spots in upper grades and more spots in K. This is different type of hard.
This. It's harder because there are so few spots, and many of them are taken up by kids who have been in a K-12 since K. It's not harder because kids who go to public elementary aren't qualified; it's because there are so many qualified kids.
Anonymous wrote:Would any PP's answer change if the choice was between an EOTP elementary and an independent private school?
, but at the cost of something. So we can do it if a kid needs special attention etc but are hoping to do public until college.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Didn't we just have a thread about JKLM kids who can't get into private because it's too hard? They have to compete against the entire DMV and they're not as specially snowflake as their parents thought?
Seriously, we just had this thread last week. The reason to enroll in private now is because you can't get in when MS rolls around. Your child just can't compete.
I thought it wasn't because "it's too hard", but because they have fewer spots in upper grades and more spots in K. This is different type of hard.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We switched to public ES, not the only ones to do this fyi. The advantages of a neighborhood school can't be overstated imho. Playdates, informal connections with other families in the area, all build a usable community. Yes, there was strong community at our private, but the distance required to make it useful was an ever present drain on our energies. The class size is bigger, but the teachers are paid more and, again imho, better qualified in many respects. Also, parents, and their views, matter less. The school listens to the parents, but really is weighing more whatever it is they see in the children.
I agree with this. Sometimes I feel like we're living in the 1970s in my 'hood. Kids running around without parents, walking over and playing with friends independently, a full village of parents who all help each other out an (importantly) spend some serious cocktail time together. No key parties, though. Sad.
Anonymous wrote:Didn't we just have a thread about JKLM kids who can't get into private because it's too hard? They have to compete against the entire DMV and they're not as specially snowflake as their parents thought?
Seriously, we just had this thread last week. The reason to enroll in private now is because you can't get in when MS rolls around. Your child just can't compete.
Anonymous wrote:Didn't we just have a thread about JKLM kids who can't get into private because it's too hard? They have to compete against the entire DMV and they're not as specially snowflake as their parents thought?
Seriously, we just had this thread last week. The reason to enroll in private now is because you can't get in when MS rolls around. Your child just can't compete.
Anonymous wrote:Would any PP's answer change if the choice was between an EOTP elementary and an independent private school?
Anonymous wrote:Would any PP's answer change if the choice was between an EOTP elementary and an independent private school?
Anonymous wrote:I have 3 kids at a JKLM (combined 18 years of instruction--yikes!)
Strengths:
-90% of teachers have been very good. I'd say 50% are as good as a teacher can get, 40% are very good and 10% have been bad (playing on their phone all day, not giving a crap bad).
-extracurriculars including PE/recess are great. I've never felt that my kids need more active time.
-curriculum is good; straight up common core for math and ELA. The "specials" classes have a lot of well-thought out projects, etc. Writing classes are okay. Again, some teachers great, some not as great.
If there's one thing that the kids and their friends (in the upper grades) are weak in it's writing.
-engaged, smart peers. By-in-large all the kids are very bright and want to learn. They've all been doing extracurriculars since birth like the rest of NW DC
-community, community, community. One million playdates and everyone within walking distance.
-parents are great. Pretty much interchangeable with all our private school friends: many doctors, law partners, some famous people, etc. Just minus the extreme wealth: We don't have people with private jets. lol
Weaknesses:
-no real acceleration at all for kids who are ahead or want to be challenged. I think the basic level of instruction is pretty fast (the cohort is bright) but there is no compacted math (accelerated math that Mont. Co does) and
certainly no gifted and talented program.
-it's not a service industry like the private school world. There is a subtle feeling that your kid is just 1 out of hundreds. Kids' own talents/interests aren't fostered or encouraged. The class is taught as a pack. Teachers
are nice but generally distant. If you want to feel like your child is a super unique and special child and have this feeling fostered and catered to you won't get this feeling at all (especially if your child is a good student---I don't have
experience with kids who are behind--perhaps they feel a bit more invested in). If your child is doing well you are definitely just a bit of a interchangeable number.
Anonymous wrote:Would any PP's answer change if the choice was between an EOTP elementary and an independent private school?