Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Always great to see how people assume the cheating spouse is male. OP made no mention of that.
People are assuming that based on the writing style. It absolutely (almost unquestionably) reads like it was written by a womab
Anonymous wrote:OP. How much is 100%? I just don’t know if I can wait for months to slowly amass info. If I have the weird text, find condoms & see a weird number. Is that enough?
SO still & consistently since we met, talks about a big trip we’ll take in a few years when the kids are old enough, and our retirement (decades away but has always been our fav topic)
F. I can’t believe it.... but I think it’s time I do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I actually think that the point of dribbling it out is as you describe -- if their reaction to hearing the part of the story you know is to lie and contradict the part of the story you know but they don't know you know, well, then, you have an answer early and upfront about whether reconciliation is possible. It won't be.
If their reaction to your dribble of what you know is to take the opportunity to come clean remorsefully and start to make amends and build trust through honesty, then there is hope of reconciliation.
Unfortunately, the chances of the latter happening are almost infinitesimal. But, the benefit of the dribble, is you will have a clear answer about reconciliation early enough to make good decisions about leaving and rebuilding your life instead of wasting years of trying to rebuild trust and engaging in a cycle of dishonesty, being caught and being remorseful. That is an abusive cycle and if you stay and participate in it, you are doing great harm to yourself.
Yup, I'm the PP who suggested not revealing things you know all at once and I think you see why I think that is important. If you tell your SO everything you know before he admits to things, 9/10 he will only ever admit to the things you already know. Sometimes a cheater may even think you are talking about X when really you know about Y, so when they tell you about the X you had no idea about it can also make the scope of things instantly clear.
I'm not saying you have to drag things out over weeks, you can reveal everything within the same conversation, just not until the cheater says his piece. What he says and how he says it can make all the difference in how you end up feeling about the situation.
The other thing I suggest is if you're not ending things right away, don't explain the how part of how you got the information either. Like my SO had zero idea I could look up his phone bill online and see a record of every text he sends and receives with a time stamp. You may need to use the how part again the next time doubt creeps up and it will save you some sanity to know you still have that in your arsenal.
Anonymous wrote:OP. How much is 100%? I just don’t know if I can wait for months to slowly amass info. If I have the weird text, find condoms & see a weird number. Is that enough?
SO still & consistently since we met, talks about a big trip we’ll take in a few years when the kids are old enough, and our retirement (decades away but has always been our fav topic)
F. I can’t believe it.... but I think it’s time I do.
Anonymous wrote:Say I get access to SO phone bill and all the texts are to friends (none of whom I’m worried about). Is it possible that all the text was is a “want to get away from my family” text, and that sentiment is why SO is distant? Which I realize isn’t great either. But it’s definitely a different conversation.
Anonymous wrote:
I actually think that the point of dribbling it out is as you describe -- if their reaction to hearing the part of the story you know is to lie and contradict the part of the story you know but they don't know you know, well, then, you have an answer early and upfront about whether reconciliation is possible. It won't be.
If their reaction to your dribble of what you know is to take the opportunity to come clean remorsefully and start to make amends and build trust through honesty, then there is hope of reconciliation.
Unfortunately, the chances of the latter happening are almost infinitesimal. But, the benefit of the dribble, is you will have a clear answer about reconciliation early enough to make good decisions about leaving and rebuilding your life instead of wasting years of trying to rebuild trust and engaging in a cycle of dishonesty, being caught and being remorseful. That is an abusive cycle and if you stay and participate in it, you are doing great harm to yourself.
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You do not confront until you have 100% solid evidence. If it's just a suspicion the cheater will always lie and spin things.
And even when you do have the evidence, don't tell your partner that. Present enough information to see if they come clean because they most likely will not and the way they spin their story will tell you a lot about them.
Confronting a cheater before you are sure it's true only gives them a chance to get better at covering things up. They won't be shamed into stopping, they will just be prompted to try harder at the deception.
And you don't need to become a super sleuth to find things, you need patience. Evidence will always reveal itself. But I get it, patience is super hard too.
Read every word of this. It is so true. I lived this and made the mistake of being impatient.
I agree with being patient and gathering clear and complete evidence before confronting. If you have incomplete evidence, or even 99% complete, there’s a good chance SO will try to lie and spin way out of it. That will leave you even more hurt and confused.
But where I disagree is that I think that when you have all the evidence, you should put it all on the table at once and say “I know you did it, now let’s talk.” If you dribble out the info you have, your SO will lie and spin and try to dodge. People are weak and they don’t like to admit they’ve done bad things, so they almost always lie. Yes, you’ll get the moral satisfaction of watching your SO twist and look like a fool, but your trust in SO will be even more destroyed, because SO will repeatedly lie to your face. I dribbled out the info I had (still haven’t released all I have, in fact) and having SO lie to my face for 7-10 days was horrible. I don’t know if I’ll ever really trust again. The destruction of trust is probably more painful than the affair itself. It has made our efforts at reconciliation very hard.
I guess you need to decide if you want to try to reconcile after you gather all the evidence. If so, I’d recommend putting it all out at once and leave no room for lies. If not, then dribble it out to see how truly duplicitous the person is. Good luck.
I actually think that the point of dribbling it out is as you describe -- if their reaction to hearing the part of the story you know is to lie and contradict the part of the story you know but they don't know you know, well, then, you have an answer early and upfront about whether reconciliation is possible. It won't be.
If their reaction to your dribble of what you know is to take the opportunity to come clean remorsefully and start to make amends and build trust through honesty, then there is hope of reconciliation.
Unfortunately, the chances of the latter happening are almost infinitesimal. But, the benefit of the dribble, is you will have a clear answer about reconciliation early enough to make good decisions about leaving and rebuilding your life instead of wasting years of trying to rebuild trust and engaging in a cycle of dishonesty, being caught and being remorseful. That is an abusive cycle and if you stay and participate in it, you are doing great harm to yourself.