Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Background: I grew up in DC. Met DH when he was living in LA and I was in San Diego. His family all lived in NOVA. Got married in San Diego because my parents and I lived there and my job at the time was too demanding to plan a wedding anywhere else. My mom actually did a lot of the legwork.
We've been married nine years, and I just found out that DH's siblings are still offended that I chose to have the wedding where I lived. They still consider it a destination wedding and apparently the family believes I was rude for holding one and inviting them. They have't stopped talking about it for nine years.
I can't lie - I'm hurt. It bothered me at the time, but I just couldn't figure out how to plan a wedding out in NOVA. I don't even have my side of the family there anymore. Are they overreacting? Am I?
OP, where is your husband in all this? Your explanation of the wedding makes it sound like you got married solo. Presumably he was also there. And, you don't mention if they are also mad at him, or what he thinks about this. With no additional information, it seems likely that, as with many supposed in-law problems, this is actually a spouse problem. If he is not standing up for your marriage and saying "WE decided to get married in CA because WE lived there" and "You need to stop insulting Larla, I won't listen to that" then he is the issue, not them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DH needs to shut this down. Couples get married where they live.
Their argument is that DH did not actually live in LA or San Diego (he was in the military and had been in LA less than two years when we married). Did I accidentally hold a destination wedding? I'm so humiliated at the idea.
Anonymous wrote:They're mad he never came home. He's the missing face at all the family events. But he's their son/brother, so instead they're projecting it on you.
Marrying a girl who lived on the West Coast just cemented the fact he was never coming back, and that's what they're upset about.
Anonymous wrote:Background: I grew up in DC. Met DH when he was living in LA and I was in San Diego. His family all lived in NOVA. Got married in San Diego because my parents and I lived there and my job at the time was too demanding to plan a wedding anywhere else. My mom actually did a lot of the legwork.
We've been married nine years, and I just found out that DH's siblings are still offended that I chose to have the wedding where I lived. They still consider it a destination wedding and apparently the family believes I was rude for holding one and inviting them. They have't stopped talking about it for nine years.
I can't lie - I'm hurt. It bothered me at the time, but I just couldn't figure out how to plan a wedding out in NOVA. I don't even have my side of the family there anymore. Are they overreacting? Am I?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DH needs to shut this down. Couples get married where they live.
Their argument is that DH did not actually live in LA or San Diego (he was in the military and had been in LA less than two years when we married). Did I accidentally hold a destination wedding? I'm so humiliated at the idea.
Aha! Now we know the truth. They hated that the military sent him so far away, but thought he'd come back home after he'd served. Instead, he married a girl in SoCal, cementing the fact that he was never coming back.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DH needs to shut this down. Couples get married where they live.
Their argument is that DH did not actually live in LA or San Diego (he was in the military and had been in LA less than two years when we married). Did I accidentally hold a destination wedding? I'm so humiliated at the idea.
You did not have a destination wedding. A destination wedding is one where the couple picks a location other than where they currently live or where they grew up for some other reason and everyone has to travel there. You chose to have the wedding where you were currently living, and the fact that some people had to travel for the wedding does not make it a destination wedding.
Anonymous wrote:DH needs to shut this down. Couples get married where they live.
Anonymous wrote:Background: I grew up in DC. Met DH when he was living in LA and I was in San Diego. His family all lived in NOVA. Got married in San Diego because my parents and I lived there and my job at the time was too demanding to plan a wedding anywhere else. My mom actually did a lot of the legwork.
We've been married nine years, and I just found out that DH's siblings are still offended that I chose to have the wedding where I lived. They still consider it a destination wedding and apparently the family believes I was rude for holding one and inviting them. They have't stopped talking about it for nine years.
I can't lie - I'm hurt. It bothered me at the time, but I just couldn't figure out how to plan a wedding out in NOVA. I don't even have my side of the family there anymore. Are they overreacting? Am I?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DH needs to shut this down. Couples get married where they live.
Their argument is that DH did not actually live in LA or San Diego (he was in the military and had been in LA less than two years when we married). Did I accidentally hold a destination wedding? I'm so humiliated at the idea.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DH needs to shut this down. Couples get married where they live.
Their argument is that DH did not actually live in LA or San Diego (he was in the military and had been in LA less than two years when we married). Did I accidentally hold a destination wedding? I'm so humiliated at the idea.
But you lived there, yes? Then no, that's not a destination wedding.