I can't possibly imagine that there's a stigma for a September birthday. Those kids are inarguably on the cusp, as they would be past the cutoff in MD. I would have no problem telling my VA born daughter that I thought we might move to MD someday so I used their cutoff.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I've read several threads on DCUM where people hotly debate the pros and cons of redshirting, and it's never quite made sense to me. Assuming you're sending your kid to public school, why not just send him to kindergarten on time and avoid the expense of daycare/preschool for an additional year? If there's an issue with readiness/maturity/etc., he can repeat kindergarten based on the advice of his teachers. If not, then he can move on to first grade. No need to stress about the decision. Just see how he does in kindergarten and, if need be, he can repeat it.
Why place your kid in an environment that is not good for him? Part of the issue is that K is not what it used to be. Kids are writing and sitting much more than in the past.
Also, ther is a huge social stigma with retention. The kid will feel like
He failed. With redshirting children on the cusp parents generally say that they had a choice, they chose for the child to be older and it was all part of the plan. Every teacher will tell you: when in doubt, keep them out.
No, there isn't. No, he won't. No they don't.
Do what makes sense for your kid.
Exactly, my child is good friends with a retained child, the children don’t really have a clue and mature adults just don’t care.
Now, I do think if you choose to start kid earlier and it doesn’t go well, the decision to retain may not be 100% up to the parents, whereas redshirting is.
By 7-8, kids do know. My kid knows and he's one of the youngest.
Anonymous wrote:My children were in a Montessori school where many students stayed for their kindergarten year, and then entered 1st grade at the public school. If your preschool offers an equivalent K curriculum, stay. Then you can decide whether to enter public in 1st or K.
Think about both ends of redshirting, OP
Anonymous wrote:I started my kids on time, even though one of them arguably would have benefited from an extra year of preschool.
However, i did not want to have a 20-year-old high school senior. That's the other end of redshirting that nobody is talking about at all.
Preschool and grade school had its ups and downs since my kid was the youngest in the class, but now she's a star student in high school and will graduate HS at 17.
Think about both ends of redshirting, OP.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I've read several threads on DCUM where people hotly debate the pros and cons of redshirting, and it's never quite made sense to me. Assuming you're sending your kid to public school, why not just send him to kindergarten on time and avoid the expense of daycare/preschool for an additional year? If there's an issue with readiness/maturity/etc., he can repeat kindergarten based on the advice of his teachers. If not, then he can move on to first grade. No need to stress about the decision. Just see how he does in kindergarten and, if need be, he can repeat it.
Why place your kid in an environment that is not good for him? Part of the issue is that K is not what it used to be. Kids are writing and sitting much more than in the past.
Also, ther is a huge social stigma with retention. The kid will feel like
He failed. With redshirting children on the cusp parents generally say that they had a choice, they chose for the child to be older and it was all part of the plan. Every teacher will tell you: when in doubt, keep them out.
No, there isn't. No, he won't. No they don't.
Do what makes sense for your kid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: My kid is only three, but their preschool is already talking about kindergarten readiness, and as they decide classrooms for next year the administrators asked some questions about our kindergarten plans. I had never heard of redshirting before, but my kid was born in early August. We live in Alexandria if that makes a difference. Sorry if this is all very obvious to everyone else but I am a first-time parent and I wasn’t sure about the logistics of this. It sounds like I can just choose whether to put my child in kindergarten right after he turns five or wait and do it right after he turns six, right? So far he is a little small for his age and tends to be very active and fidgety. I could see where giving him an extra year to mature and get a little bit more impulse control would probably make sitting at a desk for longer stretches a lot easier for him. On the other hand, he tends to do better with older kids, so it might be that he’d be happier as the youngest kid in the class versus being one of the older ones. I would love to hear perspectives and general information about how people make this decision so that I have some time to ponder and keep track of what’s happening with him.
You have the general idea. Studies have shown red shirting benefits initially. Long term there are various studies that show positive / negative, but it all depends on the SES of the parents.
I had the reverse issue - missed the K cutoff by 5 days, but could have pressed him ahead. He was / is very smart academically but immature emotionally, and he was small for his age (“failure to thrive” small). We figured best to keep him in his “correct” kindergarten class - also figuring with a lot of redshirting, if we pushed him ahead he would be the youngest by far and have kids almost 2 years older than him in class.
He is in second grade now and completely bored. He acts out because he is bored. He did not qualify for gifted... but after months of asking they have him doing accelerated work. Which in his school means he is on his iPad learning on his own but at least he’s not acting out.
Every child is different and every situation is different. But three is awefully young to try and decide whether to hold him back or not.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I've read several threads on DCUM where people hotly debate the pros and cons of redshirting, and it's never quite made sense to me. Assuming you're sending your kid to public school, why not just send him to kindergarten on time and avoid the expense of daycare/preschool for an additional year? If there's an issue with readiness/maturity/etc., he can repeat kindergarten based on the advice of his teachers. If not, then he can move on to first grade. No need to stress about the decision. Just see how he does in kindergarten and, if need be, he can repeat it.
Why place your kid in an environment that is not good for him? Part of the issue is that K is not what it used to be. Kids are writing and sitting much more than in the past.
Also, ther is a huge social stigma with retention. The kid will feel like
He failed. With redshirting children on the cusp parents generally say that they had a choice, they chose for the child to be older and it was all part of the plan. Every teacher will tell you: when in doubt, keep them out.
No, there isn't. No, he won't. No they don't.
Do what makes sense for your kid.
Exactly, my child is good friends with a retained child, the children don’t really have a clue and mature adults just don’t care.
Now, I do think if you choose to start kid earlier and it doesn’t go well, the decision to retain may not be 100% up to the parents, whereas redshirting is.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I've read several threads on DCUM where people hotly debate the pros and cons of redshirting, and it's never quite made sense to me. Assuming you're sending your kid to public school, why not just send him to kindergarten on time and avoid the expense of daycare/preschool for an additional year? If there's an issue with readiness/maturity/etc., he can repeat kindergarten based on the advice of his teachers. If not, then he can move on to first grade. No need to stress about the decision. Just see how he does in kindergarten and, if need be, he can repeat it.
Why place your kid in an environment that is not good for him? Part of the issue is that K is not what it used to be. Kids are writing and sitting much more than in the past.
Also, ther is a huge social stigma with retention. The kid will feel like
He failed. With redshirting children on the cusp parents generally say that they had a choice, they chose for the child to be older and it was all part of the plan. Every teacher will tell you: when in doubt, keep them out.
I was retained and it was awful. Constantly having to explain why i was in a great below, up until I graduated. I think it’s worse the older you are when you are retained.
No, there isn't. No, he won't. No they don't.
Do what makes sense for your kid.
Exactly, my child is good friends with a retained child, the children don’t really have a clue and mature adults just don’t care.
Now, I do think if you choose to start kid earlier and it doesn’t go well, the decision to retain may not be 100% up to the parents, whereas redshirting is.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I've read several threads on DCUM where people hotly debate the pros and cons of redshirting, and it's never quite made sense to me. Assuming you're sending your kid to public school, why not just send him to kindergarten on time and avoid the expense of daycare/preschool for an additional year? If there's an issue with readiness/maturity/etc., he can repeat kindergarten based on the advice of his teachers. If not, then he can move on to first grade. No need to stress about the decision. Just see how he does in kindergarten and, if need be, he can repeat it.
Why place your kid in an environment that is not good for him? Part of the issue is that K is not what it used to be. Kids are writing and sitting much more than in the past.
Also, ther is a huge social stigma with retention. The kid will feel like
He failed. With redshirting children on the cusp parents generally say that they had a choice, they chose for the child to be older and it was all part of the plan. Every teacher will tell you: when in doubt, keep them out.
No, there isn't. No, he won't. No they don't.
Do what makes sense for your kid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I've read several threads on DCUM where people hotly debate the pros and cons of redshirting, and it's never quite made sense to me. Assuming you're sending your kid to public school, why not just send him to kindergarten on time and avoid the expense of daycare/preschool for an additional year? If there's an issue with readiness/maturity/etc., he can repeat kindergarten based on the advice of his teachers. If not, then he can move on to first grade. No need to stress about the decision. Just see how he does in kindergarten and, if need be, he can repeat it.
Why place your kid in an environment that is not good for him? Part of the issue is that K is not what it used to be. Kids are writing and sitting much more than in the past.
Also, ther is a huge social stigma with retention. The kid will feel like
He failed. With redshirting children on the cusp parents generally say that they had a choice, they chose for the child to be older and it was all part of the plan. Every teacher will tell you: when in doubt, keep them out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I started my kids on time, even though one of them arguably would have benefited from an extra year of preschool.
However, i did not want to have a 20-year-old high school senior. That's the other end of redshirting that nobody is talking about at all.
Preschool and grade school had its ups and downs since my kid was the youngest in the class, but now she's a star student in high school and will graduate HS at 17.
Think about both ends of redshirting, OP.
So, your DD will graduate at 17. Yet, you say that had you redshirted her, she would have graduated at 20? Do you not see a problem with this calculation?
I'd much prefer to have an 18 year old at graduation. I wouldn't want a 20 year old high school senior, either. And, that is not what happens.
Anonymous wrote:I started my kids on time, even though one of them arguably would have benefited from an extra year of preschool.
However, i did not want to have a 20-year-old high school senior. That's the other end of redshirting that nobody is talking about at all.
Preschool and grade school had its ups and downs since my kid was the youngest in the class, but now she's a star student in high school and will graduate HS at 17.
Think about both ends of redshirting, OP.