Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:FYI, since many therapists, psychiatrists, etc in the DC area don't accept insurance, it's worth noting that they probably don't fall under HIPAA. However, they are still ethically bound to protect patients' privacy.
VERY wrong, for obvious reasons.
+ a million
HIPAA has nothing to do with how a doctor bills his/her services, or even whether the doctor bills at all. A doctor who treats you at a free clinic is still bound by HIPAA.
That was a simplified explanation, but whether a health care provider uses electronic transmissions to share your information for specified transactions DOES determine whether they fall under HIPAA. Feel free to knock yourself out: https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/covered-entities/index.html
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:FYI, since many therapists, psychiatrists, etc in the DC area don't accept insurance, it's worth noting that they probably don't fall under HIPAA. However, they are still ethically bound to protect patients' privacy.
VERY wrong, for obvious reasons.
+ a million
HIPAA has nothing to do with how a doctor bills his/her services, or even whether the doctor bills at all. A doctor who treats you at a free clinic is still bound by HIPAA.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:FYI, since many therapists, psychiatrists, etc in the DC area don't accept insurance, it's worth noting that they probably don't fall under HIPAA. However, they are still ethically bound to protect patients' privacy.
VERY wrong, for obvious reasons.
Anonymous wrote:FYI, since many therapists, psychiatrists, etc in the DC area don't accept insurance, it's worth noting that they probably don't fall under HIPAA. However, they are still ethically bound to protect patients' privacy.