Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A quick scan of the parking lot will tell you otherwise. Plenty of rich people's kids go to Langley.
Those cars don't mean anything. it just tells you they are UCM, not wealthy. I live in 0.5 mile from Langley and I have two full-pay tuition kids at private schools, around 40k/year for each. they have been going there since kindergarten. It costs me about 420k/year for each kid from K-12. That will be 820k for both kids. I can have multiple Benz, Range Rover and Bentley with that kind of money.
Benz, BMW, Range Rover are dime and dozen at Madeira and Potomac schools.
Anonymous wrote:A quick scan of the parking lot will tell you otherwise. Plenty of rich people's kids go to Langley.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids goto McLean and I've asked them about the differences between McLean and Langley. They joke around that the Langley kids are the drug users, but the McLean kids are the dealers. Again, just a joke but the truth behind it is that the McLean kids seem to be more down to earth while the Langley kids are more about money/looks.
You're not exactly an unbiased source if your kids go to McLean, are you? You'd want to push the stereotype that your kids are more down-to-earth.
I live in McLean (zoned for Langley), and the reality is that very few wealthy families are sending their kids to Langley. Of all the kids in our neighborhood (which is within a mile of the school), exactly 0 go to public schools. They all go private. People who earn a decent living do, but most families with a lot of money don't. So no need to worry about your classmates jetting of to Gstaad for ski weekends, or whatever the problem is.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Langley is 65% white, less than 2% low-income, and the kids mostly live in McLean and Great Falls. McLean is 55% white, about 10% low-income, and the kids live in McLean, Falls Church, and Vienna. Both schools are over 20% Asian.
The dominant culture at both schools consists of hard-working, ambitious kids taking lots of AP classes and preparing for college, but Langley is a bit more “Type A.” The precincts that are zoned for Langley mostly vote Republican, like Clifton and Fairfax Station, whereas the precincts zoned for McLean tend to vote Democratic, like nearby Arlington and Falls Church City.
Langley used to have more students, but the enrollment at McLean has been larger for the last few years. Langley still beats McLean at most sports, except for gymnastics, tennis, and the occasional basketball game.
Fairfax Station and Clifton are nowhere near McLean. They are out by Centreville
Understood - the point was that Clifton, Fairfax Station, and the areas in McLean and Great Falls zoned for Langley have been among the most Republican areas of Fairfax County.
Np. It was poorly written, if that’s the case.
I understood the pp just fine and I haven't even had my coffee yet.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids goto McLean and I've asked them about the differences between McLean and Langley. They joke around that the Langley kids are the drug users, but the McLean kids are the dealers. Again, just a joke but the truth behind it is that the McLean kids seem to be more down to earth while the Langley kids are more about money/looks.
You're not exactly an unbiased source if your kids go to McLean, are you? You'd want to push the stereotype that your kids are more down-to-earth.
I live in McLean (zoned for Langley), and the reality is that very few wealthy families are sending their kids to Langley. Of all the kids in our neighborhood (which is within a mile of the school), exactly 0 go to public schools. They all go private. People who earn a decent living do, but most families with a lot of money don't. So no need to worry about your classmates jetting of to Gstaad for ski weekends, or whatever the problem is.
EXACTLY. The uber-wealthy have kids at privates. Plenty of mini-van families at Langley (I am one). The people who constantly hate on Langley are revealing far more about themselves than about the school.
Anonymous wrote:EXACTLY. The uber-wealthy have kids at privates. Plenty of mini-van families at Langley (I am one). The people who constantly hate on Langley are revealing far more about themselves than about the school.
Anonymous wrote:My kids goto McLean and I've asked them about the differences between McLean and Langley. They joke around that the Langley kids are the drug users, but the McLean kids are the dealers. Again, just a joke but the truth behind it is that the McLean kids seem to be more down to earth while the Langley kids are more about money/looks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids goto McLean and I've asked them about the differences between McLean and Langley. They joke around that the Langley kids are the drug users, but the McLean kids are the dealers. Again, just a joke but the truth behind it is that the McLean kids seem to be more down to earth while the Langley kids are more about money/looks.
You're not exactly an unbiased source if your kids go to McLean, are you? You'd want to push the stereotype that your kids are more down-to-earth.
I live in McLean (zoned for Langley), and the reality is that very few wealthy families are sending their kids to Langley. Of all the kids in our neighborhood (which is within a mile of the school), exactly 0 go to public schools. They all go private. People who earn a decent living do, but most families with a lot of money don't. So no need to worry about your classmates jetting of to Gstaad for ski weekends, or whatever the problem is.
Anonymous wrote:My kids goto McLean and I've asked them about the differences between McLean and Langley. They joke around that the Langley kids are the drug users, but the McLean kids are the dealers. Again, just a joke but the truth behind it is that the McLean kids seem to be more down to earth while the Langley kids are more about money/looks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids goto McLean and I've asked them about the differences between McLean and Langley. They joke around that the Langley kids are the drug users, but the McLean kids are the dealers. Again, just a joke but the truth behind it is that the McLean kids seem to be more down to earth while the Langley kids are more about money/looks.
You're not exactly an unbiased source if your kids go to McLean, are you? You'd want to push the stereotype that your kids are more down-to-earth.
I live in McLean (zoned for Langley), and the reality is that very few wealthy families are sending their kids to Langley. Of all the kids in our neighborhood (which is within a mile of the school), exactly 0 go to public schools. They all go private. People who earn a decent living do, but most families with a lot of money don't. So no need to worry about your classmates jetting of to Gstaad for ski weekends, or whatever the problem is.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids goto McLean and I've asked them about the differences between McLean and Langley. They joke around that the Langley kids are the drug users, but the McLean kids are the dealers. Again, just a joke but the truth behind it is that the McLean kids seem to be more down to earth while the Langley kids are more about money/looks.
You're not exactly an unbiased source if your kids go to McLean, are you? You'd want to push the stereotype that your kids are more down-to-earth.
I live in McLean (zoned for Langley), and the reality is that very few wealthy families are sending their kids to Langley. Of all the kids in our neighborhood (which is within a mile of the school), exactly 0 go to public schools. They all go private. People who earn a decent living do, but most families with a lot of money don't. So no need to worry about your classmates jetting of to Gstaad for ski weekends, or whatever the problem is.
. Are kids at Langley HS are much better off than say kids from Falls Church or Herndon? The answer is yes but they are UCM, not the wealthy type.
Anonymous wrote:Where do I send my kids when I want to avoid high percentage of rich kids? Where are the MC and UMC kids?
Don't care for sports or arts. More like STEM and languages.
Anonymous wrote:Where do I send my kids when I want to avoid high percentage of rich kids? Where are the MC and UMC kids?
Don't care for sports or arts. More like STEM and languages.
Anonymous wrote:My kids goto McLean and I've asked them about the differences between McLean and Langley. They joke around that the Langley kids are the drug users, but the McLean kids are the dealers. Again, just a joke but the truth behind it is that the McLean kids seem to be more down to earth while the Langley kids are more about money/looks.