Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm going to say no because those professional women could choose to have a SAHD husband if they wanted.
I work and although my husband works as well, he has a much more flexible job and does all the lead parent stuff and makes dinner every night.
If a woman can't create an arrangement like that with her own husband, who she chose to marry, that's her problem. She needs to get her house in order.
Ha no. Being a SAHD sucks b/c the SAHMs shun you, and it’s looked upon by almost everyone no matter how accomplished the woman. Look at Sandberg, if any family needed a SAHD it would be hers but she had a CEO DH.
Having a SAHM is a huge career advantage, economic specialization is a well studied effect.
Depends on where you live. Here in Seattle, for example, there are a lot of SAHDs. Or men who are "creatives" and for all intents and purposes unemployed but pursuing their creative passions. That's actually pretty common.
Anonymous wrote:No other professional women impede professional women, mainly those who think their jobs should coddle them because they also have kids.
Choose your field wisely. Don't expect the nature of a job to change because you want to stop everything at 3:30pm to take the kids to piano and soccer.
Anonymous wrote:It is detrimental to professional women because it creates a suspicion of all women of child bearing age, that they aren't worth investing in, will leave an employer in a lurch, etc.
Anonymous wrote:I think having a SAHM benefits a man tremendously. But I don't think their existence necessarily impedes a woman's career path.
Anonymous wrote:In other words, if a man has a SAHM for a wife, does he necessarily have an advantage over his female colleagues?
Anonymous wrote:In other words, if a man has a SAHM for a wife, does he necessarily have an advantage over his female colleagues?