Anonymous wrote:OP here - PP, I totally disagree with your post. You are the one with the shitty attitude. You are obviously quite ignorant about what SMC really stands for and what women who are SMC go through. It is quite a particular situation, therefore the SMC network. Not because SMCs feel superior, but because they need each others' support. Are you sure there is no support group in the area that you could join? At your church? On a meetup, etc?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here - thanks PP, I totally understand.
And while I do not want to exclude other single parenting parents, with all due respect to the 10:40 poster, please do not try and tell me that a divorced parent can at least minimally not rely on the other parent. Unless your ex is a total absent parent who disappeared, does not pay any child support and never has the kids. For example: both I and my two kids have been sick all week, since last week Friday. I cannot rely on my ex to help out, to give me some relief with the kids. Most single parents I know can call the other parent and ask for some help. Several of the single moms I know had the kid's pre-school expenses paid by the father. Of course I can rely on babysitters, and such, but that is not what the post was about. My post to totally single parenting parents was about asking them if they had to compromise in their career due to single parenting.
OP, this isn't a contest. Each situation sucks. I personally don't understand why you feel compelled to rank your parenting situation as "the worst". Some aspects are worse and some are better than those of us who have a living second bio-parent. Ever try parenting with a mentally ill person? How about a drug addict or alcoholic? Or someone who is defrauding you financially? Personally, SMC seems pretty good sometimes. Yes, it's true that some parents have a co-parent who cannot be relied upon at all in the way you describe. And sometimes having someone that you rely on that pulls the rug out from under you is just as bad as having no one at all.
Do you want first prize in the "my parenting job is harder than yours" division? Or do you want actual advice? Lots of parents have to compromise their careers for parenting -- single or not -- for zillions of reasons.
If you don't want to compromise your career, your going to have to find other people to help you, whether it's a babysitter or a coop or an hour at the kids club while you work out at the gym.
Anonymous wrote:OP here - thanks PP, I totally understand.
And while I do not want to exclude other single parenting parents, with all due respect to the 10:40 poster, please do not try and tell me that a divorced parent can at least minimally not rely on the other parent. Unless your ex is a total absent parent who disappeared, does not pay any child support and never has the kids. For example: both I and my two kids have been sick all week, since last week Friday. I cannot rely on my ex to help out, to give me some relief with the kids. Most single parents I know can call the other parent and ask for some help. Several of the single moms I know had the kid's pre-school expenses paid by the father. Of course I can rely on babysitters, and such, but that is not what the post was about. My post to totally single parenting parents was about asking them if they had to compromise in their career due to single parenting.
Anonymous wrote:OP here - PP 16:21; because she is my friend, and it makes her sad that her ex-husband has zero interest in their kid. In my mind, that would make me more sad than being an SMC and my kid not having a father.
Anonymous wrote:OP here - PP, did you read the entire thread and did you read my original post and question? I am not in a contest at all. For example, I have a friend, whose husband left him right after she told him she is pregnant. The ex has seen the kid a few times, but shows up very sporadically. Does not give any money, or care at all. Even when she texted him about the kid's b'day, he did not even respond. That for me for example is a worst situation. Would make me so sad.
Anonymous wrote:OP here - thanks PP, I totally understand.
And while I do not want to exclude other single parenting parents, with all due respect to the 10:40 poster, please do not try and tell me that a divorced parent can at least minimally not rely on the other parent. Unless your ex is a total absent parent who disappeared, does not pay any child support and never has the kids. For example: both I and my two kids have been sick all week, since last week Friday. I cannot rely on my ex to help out, to give me some relief with the kids. Most single parents I know can call the other parent and ask for some help. Several of the single moms I know had the kid's pre-school expenses paid by the father. Of course I can rely on babysitters, and such, but that is not what the post was about. My post to totally single parenting parents was about asking them if they had to compromise in their career due to single parenting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here - SMCs do not have a co-parent and therefore have zero downtime, that is why I was addressing this to other SMCs. Several divorced/ single Moms I know have a 50/50 arrangement with the other parent, who helps out financially and they share the kid 50/50% or the father has the kid every second weekend etc. Us, Single Moms by Choice do not have any financial help, or anyone else than ourselves to rely on. Therefore my post and question.
SMC is not an odd classification. It is those Moms who have kids via a sperm donor and did it on their own, i.e. they are not divorced, separated etc.
OP, while I understand the SMC acronym, I would encourage you to rethink your "anyone other than ourselves to rely on" self-description. No parent can parent effectively without relying on other people. The assumption is that married or divorced parents have a co-parent they can "rely" on. This is often not the case, and many of us are trapped in situations with a spouse or co-parent who are actually unreliable and make co-parenting harder. There are many days when I have thought that co-parenting would be easier if I were SMC, and I'm sure SMC sometimes think co-parenting would be easier with a partner. Those of us with unreliable parenting partners have learned that all parents have to build their network of support if it is not found naturally in a supportive 2 parent structure. Nannies, babysitters, neighborhood babysitting co-ops, friends, supportive co-workers who can cover for you and you them, supportive bosses, insurance plans for disability or unemployment, church, mentoring groups, tutors, sports or activities, etc. Pay them, befriend them or trade them. But, it can't be just you. That's not healthy for you, and it's not healthy for the kids.
Anonymous wrote:OP here - SMCs do not have a co-parent and therefore have zero downtime, that is why I was addressing this to other SMCs. Several divorced/ single Moms I know have a 50/50 arrangement with the other parent, who helps out financially and they share the kid 50/50% or the father has the kid every second weekend etc. Us, Single Moms by Choice do not have any financial help, or anyone else than ourselves to rely on. Therefore my post and question.
SMC is not an odd classification. It is those Moms who have kids via a sperm donor and did it on their own, i.e. they are not divorced, separated etc.