Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Perhaps DCPS should establish a magnet school for all students with attendance problems. That way, they could deal with them all in one place, rather than in every school
It certainly would be a huge school -- since "75 percent of the 2,307 graduates systemwide missed more than 10 percent of the school days"
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/dc-schools-increasingly-graduating-chronically-absent-students-report-finds/2018/01/16/a1722404-bf01-44bc-a8c7-e9d9e3b3e9df_story.html?utm_term=.b60ce4514275
I heard the FBI building will be vacant soon.
Or, why not focus graduation on GPA and not on attendance? A little more flexibility with respect to absences would seem to be in order here.
Because they don’t apply very rigorous standards to GPAs either. Now if we want to go with another PP’s suggestion and us the PARCC scores, that might be a meaningful metric.
This is the most objective measure we have for now, and I'm sure you will see correlation! Teacher created tests show nothing, just like the fake attendance!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Perhaps DCPS should establish a magnet school for all students with attendance problems. That way, they could deal with them all in one place, rather than in every school
It certainly would be a huge school -- since "75 percent of the 2,307 graduates systemwide missed more than 10 percent of the school days"
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/dc-schools-increasingly-graduating-chronically-absent-students-report-finds/2018/01/16/a1722404-bf01-44bc-a8c7-e9d9e3b3e9df_story.html?utm_term=.b60ce4514275
I heard the FBI building will be vacant soon.
Or, why not focus graduation on GPA and not on attendance? A little more flexibility with respect to absences would seem to be in order here.
Because they don’t apply very rigorous standards to GPAs either. Now if we want to go with another PP’s suggestion and us the PARCC scores, that might be a meaningful metric.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Perhaps DCPS should establish a magnet school for all students with attendance problems. That way, they could deal with them all in one place, rather than in every school
It certainly would be a huge school -- since "75 percent of the 2,307 graduates systemwide missed more than 10 percent of the school days"
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/dc-schools-increasingly-graduating-chronically-absent-students-report-finds/2018/01/16/a1722404-bf01-44bc-a8c7-e9d9e3b3e9df_story.html?utm_term=.b60ce4514275
I heard the FBI building will be vacant soon.
Or, why not focus graduation on GPA and not on attendance? A little more flexibility with respect to absences would seem to be in order here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Perhaps DCPS should establish a magnet school for all students with attendance problems. That way, they could deal with them all in one place, rather than in every school
It certainly would be a huge school -- since "75 percent of the 2,307 graduates systemwide missed more than 10 percent of the school days"
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/dc-schools-increasingly-graduating-chronically-absent-students-report-finds/2018/01/16/a1722404-bf01-44bc-a8c7-e9d9e3b3e9df_story.html?utm_term=.b60ce4514275
I heard the FBI building will be vacant soon.
Or, why not focus graduation on GPA and not on attendance? A little more flexibility with respect to absences would seem to be in order here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Perhaps DCPS should establish a magnet school for all students with attendance problems. That way, they could deal with them all in one place, rather than in every school
It certainly would be a huge school -- since "75 percent of the 2,307 graduates systemwide missed more than 10 percent of the school days"
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/dc-schools-increasingly-graduating-chronically-absent-students-report-finds/2018/01/16/a1722404-bf01-44bc-a8c7-e9d9e3b3e9df_story.html?utm_term=.b60ce4514275
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the bigger issue are the test scores. the HS kids are so far behind why should they bother showing up? At ballou less than 3% meet grade expectations? how about you must have a 3 on a parcc test to move on?
That has been shown to increase drop out rates -- same problem by a different name. The kids who aren't showing up have effectively dropped out, but they are on the books all the way to graduation.
You need to do this from day one starting at elementary school.
DCPS should ship all youth who are over 2 years behind to either a KIPP or DC Prep school. They are the only ones that can get results from these populations. For the extra hard discipline cases there needs to be a military style school (this would be less than 5% per school)
by high school its too late and I agree most would drop out. Over time kids would get on grade level following the above, until then if kids are more than 3 grad levels behind in 9th grade they should go straight to an apprenticeship program. We are wasting time with the kids who can learn and these kids keeping them in a traditional high school program.
Anonymous wrote:Yes guys. The answer, as we all know, is "school prison," i.e., all students at 10th grade are sentenced to solitary confinement for two years (730 days) and pushed through mastery of all subjects required for high school graduation, eyes held open Clockwork Orange style. Once mastery is achieved, these students will be given back to their loving families and told to get jobs at Sweetgreen.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can schools remove OOB kids who don’t meet attendance requirements and not have them count against that school’s graduation rate?
* I realize they can’t do this now, but it might be a piece of the solution.
They do this already -- typically at the beginning of the year. In fall 2016 I know many students who were not allowed to re-enroll at Wilson and went back to their IB schools.
If that’s the case, how are we seeing 1 in 3?
The report is looking at senior year attendance -- they would have had to screw up junior year attendance to be sent to neighborhood school.
Also why do you assume that the kids with attendance problems are all OOB?
I actually assumed it should be easier to remove an OOB student for non-attendance. I didn’t think much about which students are most likely to fail to meet attendance requirements. Now that you mention it, though, I assume there’s a correlation between SES and attendance.
Anonymous wrote:Perhaps DCPS should establish a magnet school for all students with attendance problems. That way, they could deal with them all in one place, rather than in every school
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can schools remove OOB kids who don’t meet attendance requirements and not have them count against that school’s graduation rate?
* I realize they can’t do this now, but it might be a piece of the solution.
They do this already -- typically at the beginning of the year. In fall 2016 I know many students who were not allowed to re-enroll at Wilson and went back to their IB schools.
If that’s the case, how are we seeing 1 in 3?
The report is looking at senior year attendance -- they would have had to screw up junior year attendance to be sent to neighborhood school.
Also why do you assume that the kids with attendance problems are all OOB?