Anonymous wrote:Go Deathridge!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I debated in high school and college, and would love for my own children to do policy debate in high school. It is an activity that develops your reasoning, critical thinking, and ability to act quickly and strategically, as well as your reading, research, and presentation skills. Fast talking and a developed knowledge of philosophy are a must in policy debate as it has currently evolved. I also love that debate remains an egalitarian competition in which the name and wealth of your school does not give you an advantage, and in which students from small-town, obscure mid-western high schools (like mine) compete on equal footing with students from the best, large metropolitan public schools, and the elite southern, tx, and east/west coast privates. You are judged, and have to earn your wins round-by-round, tournament-by-tournament, dedicating many hours to research, practice, and travel, and making friends from high schools around the country in the process. Some number of us even end up as professionals in Washington, often as attorneys.
Back in my day, several decades, there were a number of good Washington area teams on the national circuit, including Georgetown Day and Thomas Jefferson. The strong local schools participating have been culled a bit since the '90s, which I attribute to the time commitment the activity requires. My own children are still a few years away from high school, but it is with interest that I have watched Jon Sharp and Alex Lennon, themselves college debaters, take the helm at GDS and TJ respectively. I am excited to see that GDS (2 teams) and TJ (1 team) both currently have teams with at least one TOC bid, and that both schools had team(s) break at a recent national tournament in Lexington. GDS teams appear to have won both the novice division and made the varsity final (it looks like there was no varsity final held). It is nice to see these two local schools resurgent on the national circuit, though unfortunately TJ won't be an option for us, as we live in DC itself.
Potomac School now has an excellent debate team. Harry Strong, a nationally-recognized coach, was hired last year to lead the program.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Which is the one where they talk 100 miles an hour and (to an uneducated observer) it seems like it's kind of akin to fencing with scoring as many points as you can (thus the fast talking)? Is that policy? ...
Yes, that is policy debate. Each team is a partnership of two individuals.
The auctioneer-style speed talking is what I recall too. It seemed to me like a contest of who could best memorize a list of points and regurgitate them the fastest.
Anonymous wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ltpndj_YPdU
NDT at its finest...GU versus Wake.
Anonymous wrote:You should know that unless your kid comes into GDS with a lot of debate experience, they probably won’t make the team. I believe GDS actually recruits debaters.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Which is the one where they talk 100 miles an hour and (to an uneducated observer) it seems like it's kind of akin to fencing with scoring as many points as you can (thus the fast talking)? Is that policy? ...
Yes, that is policy debate. Each team is a partnership of two individuals.
Anonymous wrote:You did not select the policy toggle in the upper right. You must of selected LD. Re-do and the data will appear.
Anonymous wrote:I debated in high school and college, and would love for my own children to do policy debate in high school. It is an activity that develops your reasoning, critical thinking, and ability to act quickly and strategically, as well as your reading, research, and presentation skills. Fast talking and a developed knowledge of philosophy are a must in policy debate as it has currently evolved. I also love that debate remains an egalitarian competition in which the name and wealth of your school does not give you an advantage, and in which students from small-town, obscure mid-western high schools (like mine) compete on equal footing with students from the best, large metropolitan public schools, and the elite southern, tx, and east/west coast privates. You are judged, and have to earn your wins round-by-round, tournament-by-tournament, dedicating many hours to research, practice, and travel, and making friends from high schools around the country in the process. Some number of us even end up as professionals in Washington, often as attorneys.
Back in my day, several decades, there were a number of good Washington area teams on the national circuit, including Georgetown Day and Thomas Jefferson. The strong local schools participating have been culled a bit since the '90s, which I attribute to the time commitment the activity requires. My own children are still a few years away from high school, but it is with interest that I have watched Jon Sharp and Alex Lennon, themselves college debaters, take the helm at GDS and TJ respectively. I am excited to see that GDS (2 teams) and TJ (1 team) both currently have teams with at least one TOC bid, and that both schools had team(s) break at a recent national tournament in Lexington. GDS teams appear to have won both the novice division and made the varsity final (it looks like there was no varsity final held). It is nice to see these two local schools resurgent on the national circuit, though unfortunately TJ won't be an option for us, as we live in DC itself.
Anonymous wrote:Policy is for nerds who like little wheelbarrows full of sad notecards. Parliamentary all the way.
Welcome to 2018. Policy debaters do not use notecards anymore, it's all done via laptops, dropbox, and flashdrives.
The figurative wheelbarrows remain.