Anonymous wrote:Wakefield? Are you kidding me? Have you seen the new school? It is gorgeous - indoor pool, you name it. WAY better than anything in Fairfax County.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids attend Mclean HS so I do not have horse in this race. Both Yorktown and W-L HS are in the same tennis division as Mclean and my kids play varsity tennis for Mclean HS last year so I had a chance to see both Yorktown and W-L through sports, in this case, boys tennis.
W-L tennis team is very bad. It is so bad that all the starters players from Mclean sat out and sub with 3rd stringers and Mclean still beat W-L both times really bad. All of the players from W-L seemed to have very little outside private coaching and it showed. The Mclean players were very well fed during the tennis matches. There were plenty of food, fruit and drink for Mclean team while there was nothing but water for W-L. The tennis coach for W-L is a PE teacher from Long Fellow MS, very nice guy but his team was no match for Mclean. The support from the Mclean parents for the Mclean tennis team was kinda absurd, bordering on spoiling the players. There were 11 players on the Mclean tennis team graduated in 2017 and six of them went to UVA and the other five went to VA tech. Btw, all of the players from Mclean HS had outside private coaching, I guess it is because the Mclean parents just have more resources. They also had private academic tutoring as well.
Yorktown had an OK tennis team last year. They lost twice to Mclean but not as bad as W-L. All of the kids on the Yorktown tennis team were very good students. The support from the parents for Yorktown tennis team was not as strong as Mclean. About half of the kids on the Yorktown tennis had outside private coaching with the rest had very little.
Based on what I saw last year, it looks like the kids on the tennis team from Yorktown come from a wealthier families with strong parents so they are much more disciplines than kids from W-L.
Last year, Mclean finished 1st in the division while Yorktown finished 4th. W-L finished last. Mclean won the state 6A boys tennis title.
If you want to know how good a high school is in term of academic, just look at the school tennis team record. If the tennis team of that school does does well, that school has a sterling academic. Look around, Mclean, Langley, James Madison, and Marshalls all have excellent tennis program and an excellence academic school.
From what I read, Wakefield boys and tennis girls team are just outright bad. Therefore, one would come to the conclusion that academic performance at Wakefield HS has a lot to be desired, to put it gently. The same for W-L as well.
You, and this post are retarded.
Anonymous wrote:We moved out of Arlington for better schools. The fact that Arlington made its high schools double as rec centers was not a plus in our book.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:According to US NEWS report, you can draw your own conclusion.
Wakefield:
college readiness: 43.8; AP test: 56%, AP passed: 70%. Student population: Asian 9%; black 22%; Hispanic 44%; white 20%
W-L:
college readiness: 54.3; AP test: 77%, AP passed: 61%. Student population: Asian 8%; black 5%; Hispanic 16%; white 66%
Yorktown:
college readiness: 69.2; AP test: 80%, AP passed: 82%. Student population: Asian 10%; black 11%; Hispanic 34%; white 40%
Langley:
college readiness: 72.4; AP test: 80%, AP passed: 87%. Student population: Asian 8%; black 5%; Hispanic 16%; white 66%
Mclean:
college readiness: 75; AP test: 81%, AP passed: 90%. Student population: Asian 21%; black 1%; Hispanic 5%; white 68%
W-L is mostly IB, so it’s not an apples-to-apples comparison.
Plus your demographic information is wrong. No way Langley is 21% black and Hispanic, and McLean is closer to 12% Hispanic and 55% white.
Anonymous wrote:According to US NEWS report, you can draw your own conclusion.
Wakefield:
college readiness: 43.8; AP test: 56%, AP passed: 70%. Student population: Asian 9%; black 22%; Hispanic 44%; white 20%
W-L:
college readiness: 54.3; AP test: 77%, AP passed: 61%. Student population: Asian 8%; black 5%; Hispanic 16%; white 66%
Yorktown:
college readiness: 69.2; AP test: 80%, AP passed: 82%. Student population: Asian 10%; black 11%; Hispanic 34%; white 40%
Langley:
college readiness: 72.4; AP test: 80%, AP passed: 87%. Student population: Asian 8%; black 5%; Hispanic 16%; white 66%
Mclean:
college readiness: 75; AP test: 81%, AP passed: 90%. Student population: Asian 21%; black 1%; Hispanic 5%; white 68%
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids attend Mclean HS so I do not have horse in this race. Both Yorktown and W-L HS are in the same tennis division as Mclean and my kids play varsity tennis for Mclean HS last year so I had a chance to see both Yorktown and W-L through sports, in this case, boys tennis.
W-L tennis team is very bad. It is so bad that all the starters players from Mclean sat out and sub with 3rd stringers and Mclean still beat W-L both times really bad. All of the players from W-L seemed to have very little outside private coaching and it showed. The Mclean players were very well fed during the tennis matches. There were plenty of food, fruit and drink for Mclean team while there was nothing but water for W-L. The tennis coach for W-L is a PE teacher from Long Fellow MS, very nice guy but his team was no match for Mclean. The support from the Mclean parents for the Mclean tennis team was kinda absurd, bordering on spoiling the players. There were 11 players on the Mclean tennis team graduated in 2017 and six of them went to UVA and the other five went to VA tech. Btw, all of the players from Mclean HS had outside private coaching, I guess it is because the Mclean parents just have more resources. They also had private academic tutoring as well.
Yorktown had an OK tennis team last year. They lost twice to Mclean but not as bad as W-L. All of the kids on the Yorktown tennis team were very good students. The support from the parents for Yorktown tennis team was not as strong as Mclean. About half of the kids on the Yorktown tennis had outside private coaching with the rest had very little.
Based on what I saw last year, it looks like the kids on the tennis team from Yorktown come from a wealthier families with strong parents so they are much more disciplines than kids from W-L.
Last year, Mclean finished 1st in the division while Yorktown finished 4th. W-L finished last. Mclean won the state 6A boys tennis title.
If you want to know how good a high school is in term of academic, just look at the school tennis team record. If the tennis team of that school does does well, that school has a sterling academic. Look around, Mclean, Langley, James Madison, and Marshalls all have excellent tennis program and an excellence academic school.
From what I read, Wakefield boys and tennis girls team are just outright bad. Therefore, one would come to the conclusion that academic performance at Wakefield HS has a lot to be desired, to put it gently. The same for W-L as well.
You, and this post are retarded.
Anonymous wrote:My kids attend Mclean HS so I do not have horse in this race. Both Yorktown and W-L HS are in the same tennis division as Mclean and my kids play varsity tennis for Mclean HS last year so I had a chance to see both Yorktown and W-L through sports, in this case, boys tennis.
W-L tennis team is very bad. It is so bad that all the starters players from Mclean sat out and sub with 3rd stringers and Mclean still beat W-L both times really bad. All of the players from W-L seemed to have very little outside private coaching and it showed. The Mclean players were very well fed during the tennis matches. There were plenty of food, fruit and drink for Mclean team while there was nothing but water for W-L. The tennis coach for W-L is a PE teacher from Long Fellow MS, very nice guy but his team was no match for Mclean. The support from the Mclean parents for the Mclean tennis team was kinda absurd, bordering on spoiling the players. There were 11 players on the Mclean tennis team graduated in 2017 and six of them went to UVA and the other five went to VA tech. Btw, all of the players from Mclean HS had outside private coaching, I guess it is because the Mclean parents just have more resources. They also had private academic tutoring as well.
Yorktown had an OK tennis team last year. They lost twice to Mclean but not as bad as W-L. All of the kids on the Yorktown tennis team were very good students. The support from the parents for Yorktown tennis team was not as strong as Mclean. About half of the kids on the Yorktown tennis had outside private coaching with the rest had very little.
Based on what I saw last year, it looks like the kids on the tennis team from Yorktown come from a wealthier families with strong parents so they are much more disciplines than kids from W-L.
Last year, Mclean finished 1st in the division while Yorktown finished 4th. W-L finished last. Mclean won the state 6A boys tennis title.
If you want to know how good a high school is in term of academic, just look at the school tennis team record. If the tennis team of that school does does well, that school has a sterling academic. Look around, Mclean, Langley, James Madison, and Marshalls all have excellent tennis program and an excellence academic school.
From what I read, Wakefield boys and tennis girls team are just outright bad. Therefore, one would come to the conclusion that academic performance at Wakefield HS has a lot to be desired, to put it gently. The same for W-L as well.
Anonymous wrote:My kids attend Mclean HS so I do not have horse in this race. Both Yorktown and W-L HS are in the same tennis division as Mclean and my kids play varsity tennis for Mclean HS last year so I had a chance to see both Yorktown and W-L through sports, in this case, boys tennis.
W-L tennis team is very bad. It is so bad that all the starters players from Mclean sat out and sub with 3rd stringers and Mclean still beat W-L both times really bad. All of the players from W-L seemed to have very little outside private coaching and it showed. The Mclean players were very well fed during the tennis matches. There were plenty of food, fruit and drink for Mclean team while there was nothing but water for W-L. The tennis coach for W-L is a PE teacher from Long Fellow MS, very nice guy but his team was no match for Mclean. The support from the Mclean parents for the Mclean tennis team was kinda absurd, bordering on spoiling the players. There were 11 players on the Mclean tennis team graduated in 2017 and six of them went to UVA and the other five went to VA tech. Btw, all of the players from Mclean HS had outside private coaching, I guess it is because the Mclean parents just have more resources. They also had private academic tutoring as well.
Yorktown had an OK tennis team last year. They lost twice to Mclean but not as bad as W-L. All of the kids on the Yorktown tennis team were very good students. The support from the parents for Yorktown tennis team was not as strong as Mclean. About half of the kids on the Yorktown tennis had outside private coaching with the rest had very little.
Based on what I saw last year, it looks like the kids on the tennis team from Yorktown come from a wealthier families with strong parents so they are much more disciplines than kids from W-L.
Last year, Mclean finished 1st in the division while Yorktown finished 4th. W-L finished last. Mclean won the state 6A boys tennis title.
If you want to know how good a high school is in term of academic, just look at the school tennis team record. If the tennis team of that school does does well, that school has a sterling academic. Look around, Mclean, Langley, James Madison, and Marshalls all have excellent tennis program and an excellence academic school.
From what I read, Wakefield boys and tennis girls team are just outright bad. Therefore, one would come to the conclusion that academic performance at Wakefield HS has a lot to be desired, to put it gently. The same for W-L as well.
Anonymous wrote:If you are white and rich you kid will do fine. If you are Latino and don't speak English, then probably not