Anonymous wrote:OP seems to have disappeared and the original post suggested that her DD is not aiming for a top score because she has the athletic hook. She probably just needs to show college readiness and to come up with something comes close to the bottom 25% for the schools she is interested in. I don't know if it would be worth $3000 on tutoring - it depends where her baseline scores are. The advice to take timed practice tests makes sense.
My kids are not top students and neither one of them did prep for these tests beyond doing a practice test. The ACT in particular seemed to cover the basics of what they should have learned in HS to date and seemed more straightforward, with no need to learn test-taking strategies. My B student did much better on the ACT (30 vs. 1180) but did take it twice. My A- student did slightly better on the ACT (34 vs. 1480) and took each test one time.
Anonymous wrote:Professional advice we got was to take practice tests for both (actual old tests under timed conditions) and focus on only one test based on that outcome. A couple of other things that might not have been mentioned: SAT Math has a section with no calculators and ACT does not; ACT has a Science section, but it's really more reading and interpreting science texts and some STEM kids don't like it; both tests can be prepped for and, if you can afford it, private tutoring is more efficient as tutors know the "tricks" and can hone in on specific areas for focus based on practice exams. (They're expensive though $200-$500/hour is what we found.)
Anonymous wrote:Professional advice we got was to take practice tests for both (actual old tests under timed conditions) and focus on only one test based on that outcome. A couple of other things that might not have been mentioned: SAT Math has a section with no calculators and ACT does not; ACT has a Science section, but it's really more reading and interpreting science texts and some STEM kids don't like it; both tests can be prepped for and, if you can afford it, private tutoring is more efficient as tutors know the "tricks" and can hone in on specific areas for focus based on practice exams. (They're expensive though $200-$500/hour is what we found.)
Anonymous wrote:With the ACT you don't have to do subject tests. My DC who took the ACT just had a lot less testing to deal with than my DC who took the SAT.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The ACT is a more straightforward test than the SAT. You don’t need to figure out what is being asked as much as you do the SAT. It isn’t necessarily easier. The science portion is really more reading comprehension than pure science btw.
This, above, is exactly what our DD has found and what has been discussed by her HS counselors in some presentations.
OP, have your DD take practice tests for both, but try to replicate the time limits since working against the clock is key.
Anonymous wrote:The ACT is a more straightforward test than the SAT. You don’t need to figure out what is being asked as much as you do the SAT. It isn’t necessarily easier. The science portion is really more reading comprehension than pure science btw.
Anonymous wrote:Why not take both? My son is a senior and took the SAT twice and ACT once.