HoCo333 wrote:Anonymous wrote:Online porn has made it MUCH easier for men to go without sex. It's easier now to play it cool with a girlfriend when you know that everything fantasy imaginable is available online. I think men were pushier about sex a generation ago basically due to desperation.
*
Anonymous wrote:Online porn has made it MUCH easier for men to go without sex. It's easier now to play it cool with a girlfriend when you know that everything fantasy imaginable is available online. I think men were pushier about sex a generation ago basically due to desperation.
Anonymous wrote:Not sure if this situation is weird, or if my expectations are off base.
I’ve been dating a guy for a few weeks, and while we’ve been intimate, he isn’t pushy. I mean, we kiss and it leads to sex, but he isn’t demanding. For example, he’s totally fine after a date walking me to my stoop and kissing me goodnight and not coming up. But if I invite him up, he comes up. We are both in our 40s.
I this weird or have I just been dating losers?
Anonymous wrote:Online porn has made it MUCH easier for men to go without sex. It's easier now to play it cool with a girlfriend when you know that everything fantasy imaginable is available online. I think men were pushier about sex a generation ago basically due to desperation.
Anonymous wrote:Why do you think a guy who is indifferent to sex is "better" than a guy who consistently wants it?
Anonymous wrote:He does what you want and you're complaining. Got it.
Anonymous wrote:A guy can’t win. He is polite, so he must not be into you. He asks to come inside, he’s pushy and desperate.
Ladies, what’s a man to do?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do you think a guy who is indifferent to sex is "better" than a guy who consistently wants it?
Being a gentleman isn’t indifferent per se, it’s just not begging for it like you’re desperate.
He waits for her to invite him in. That has nothing to do with "being a gentleman" it just means he is passive: that is generally NOT a positive attribute especially for a male.
Conversely, if he (actively) invited himself in, that's not "begging for it" or "desperate".
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do you think a guy who is indifferent to sex is "better" than a guy who consistently wants it?
Being a gentleman isn’t indifferent per se, it’s just not begging for it like you’re desperate.
He waits for her to invite him in. That has nothing to do with "being a gentleman" it just means he is passive: that is generally NOT a positive attribute especially for a male.
Conversely, if he (actively) invited himself in, that's not "begging for it" or "desperate".
I'll take "How are women insanely impossible to please" for 200, Alex.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What did the other guys do?
Baby its Cold Outside.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do you think a guy who is indifferent to sex is "better" than a guy who consistently wants it?
Being a gentleman isn’t indifferent per se, it’s just not begging for it like you’re desperate.
He waits for her to invite him in. That has nothing to do with "being a gentleman" it just means he is passive: that is generally NOT a positive attribute especially for a male.
Conversely, if he (actively) invited himself in, that's not "begging for it" or "desperate".