Anonymous wrote:Symmetrical features, good bone structure, and usually conventional taste in hairstyles and clothes. Nothing too extreme or exaggerated or "cute" (like Angelina's lips, which are out of proportion to her thin, angular face, or giant Kewpie doll eyes and a button mouth). People using this term in the west are probably thinking from a western perspective, of course. A "classic beauty" in Japan may mean something different (though symmetry is pretty universally admired).
Anonymous wrote:Small, regular features. Slim and well dressed. Think Halle Berry, Charlize Theron, Grace Kelly, Vivien Leigh...
Anonymous wrote:^^ amal should not be there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^ amal should not be there.
I agree. She is obviously good looking, but her features are way too strong to be considered a classic beauty.
Anonymous wrote:Oval face, arched brows, longer thinner nose, thinner lips. No 'one feature' that is distracting like a hooked nose, thicker lips or slanted eyes.
I'm white but not a 'classic beauty' I don't think that 'classic beauty' is very 'sexy' or beautiful, to be honest. It's a 'checking the boxes but not ringing the bells' kind of look.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think Amal Clooney is the best representation of a modern-day classic beauty.
Her make-up is complementary and understated. She isn't trendy or trying to look younger than she is. She also has class, compassion and carries herself with integrity. It's no all about how you look.
I agree, a lot of it has to do with how you carry yourself. This is going to sound nuts but I feel like Paris hilton could be a classic beauty if she wasn’t Paris Hilton.
Anonymous wrote:^^ amal should not be there.
Anonymous wrote:I think Amal Clooney is the best representation of a modern-day classic beauty.
Her make-up is complementary and understated. She isn't trendy or trying to look younger than she is. She also has class, compassion and carries herself with integrity. It's no all about how you look.