Anonymous wrote:OP, have you talked with your son about talking when he's supposed to be listening, about not interrupting, in light of this phone call?
Anonymous wrote:You want to call CPS and ruin someone’s career over this? Unbelievable.
Anonymous wrote:You want to call CPS and ruin someone’s career over this? Unbelievable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That teacher needs to apologize to DS. She needs to say "I was wrong to touch your face. I should not have done that. I'm sorry I did that to you. I was wrong."
He will say "It's okay!" and they will move on.
Yup. Sounds like an old-fashioned teacher, not necessarily a perverted abuser.
Yep. I was a terrible kid and a terrible student. My first grade teacher hated me and used to grab my arm and drag me out of the classroom screaming at me, and leave me in the hall, regularly. I hated her but whatever. I only got upset when my mom and i ran into her at the supermarket and she was NICE to my mother, because why didn't she show her true mean and bitchy self to my mother?
Despite being a delicate and sensitive flower, I did not become afraid of school. I graduated on time, and went on to eventually become a productive member of society. Now that I am an older delicate and sensitive flower I know how to not allow people to treat me that way.
OP's son is FINE. It was three seconds, life moved on, he wasn't permanently damaged.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They need to report it to CPS because they are mandated reporters. It is doubtful your child is the first child she has touched. I would call CPS and report it too. That teacher can absolutely not be allowed to ever teach. Your child will most likely get interviewed by a social worker.
This.
Both teachers can and should be investigated in this case. One for putting her hands on the child. The other for not reporting the first.
—MCPS teacher.
Why investigate the homeroom teacher? She intervened and reported it to the principal who promised to follow protocol. If this needs to be reported to CPS, it should be in the protocol.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nope. They are mandated reporters to CPS. They are supposed to call CPS.
I don't think you understand what type of information you are required to report. This does not fall into that category by any stretch.
/Mandated Reporter
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They need to report it to CPS because they are mandated reporters. It is doubtful your child is the first child she has touched. I would call CPS and report it too. That teacher can absolutely not be allowed to ever teach. Your child will most likely get interviewed by a social worker.
This.
Both teachers can and should be investigated in this case. One for putting her hands on the child. The other for not reporting the first.
—MCPS teacher.
Anonymous wrote:WTF is wrong with some of you? You think it is "old fashioned" and "ok" for a teacher to grab a student's face when he interrupts her? That is behavior normal people wouldn't allow in a 2 year old.
OP you are perfectly justified in calling CPS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They need to report it to CPS because they are mandated reporters. It is doubtful your child is the first child she has touched. I would call CPS and report it too. That teacher can absolutely not be allowed to ever teach. Your child will most likely get interviewed by a social worker.
This.
Both teachers can and should be investigated in this case. One for putting her hands on the child. The other for not reporting the first.
—MCPS teacher.