Anonymous wrote:Family law attorney here
Look people, you might not like it, but don't spread misinformation in here. In a long marriage like this, where the wife hasn't worked by choice of both partners, yes she will be awarded some type of alimony unless her lawyer is a real incompetent. which I doubt because you'd have to be a huge fool not to present a case for it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Family law attorney here
Look people, you might not like it, but don't spread misinformation in here. In a long marriage like this, where the wife hasn't worked by choice of both partners, yes she will be awarded some type of alimony unless her lawyer is a real incompetent. which I doubt because you'd have to be a huge fool not to present a case for it.
I don't see how it would be for that long of a period though just based on what I presume to be the ages of the parties. Say they got married at 25 or 30 that means they are both between 55-60 years of age. Presumably he will retire at some point in the next few years after which his income will be from a 401K or other investment accounts. Presumably these will be split 50/50 in the divorce so at that point she will have access to the same income that he does.
Anonymous wrote:Family law attorney here
Look people, you might not like it, but don't spread misinformation in here. In a long marriage like this, where the wife hasn't worked by choice of both partners, yes she will be awarded some type of alimony unless her lawyer is a real incompetent. which I doubt because you'd have to be a huge fool not to present a case for it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Regardless of her education, she will need to get a job. To “not work” is a perk of marriage that goes away when the marriage ends.
Even if she hasn’t worked for 30 years and has kids at home? That seems like precedent.
Unless she is completely unable to work due to some mental or physical disability (in which case social security may be involved). Most marriage "precedents" cease along with the marriage (joint bank accounts; holiday traditions; sleeping together; etc). Who has "kids at home" after 30 years marriage? Alimony has nothing to do with kids, that is called child support and it stops when kids turn 18.
From a legal perspective, the lifestyle to which she has become accustomed is relevant and will be considered by the judge.
Anonymous wrote:What is the calculation typically in long term marriages? Does it go on forever?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Regardless of her education, she will need to get a job. To “not work” is a perk of marriage that goes away when the marriage ends.
Even if she hasn’t worked for 30 years and has kids at home? That seems like precedent.
Unless she is completely unable to work due to some mental or physical disability (in which case social security may be involved). Most marriage "precedents" cease along with the marriage (joint bank accounts; holiday traditions; sleeping together; etc). Who has "kids at home" after 30 years marriage? Alimony has nothing to do with kids, that is called child support and it stops when kids turn 18.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can understand that not working could be a marital perk if the marriage does not produce offspring.
However if one spouse quits his/her career in order to remain @home, providing all the childcare, then I see this as a disadvantage rather than an actual “perk.”
Leaving the work force does not bode well for anyone.
Doing so leaves a gap on your resume + it is not easy later on when you re-enter.
Plus daily childcare is a lot more work than working outside of the home.
Caring for little ones is a ton of mental/physical energy which can be very taxing on anyone.
Plus the loss of personal satisfaction along w/the isolated lifestyle may not be for everyone.
That being said, I do acknowledge that each + every situation will be completely different.
Starting at about age 4 children spend their days at this thing called "school" so there is no longer a need for anyone to be home providing childcare. A four year resume gap shouldn't prevent anyone from getting a job.
Anonymous wrote:I can understand that not working could be a marital perk if the marriage does not produce offspring.
However if one spouse quits his/her career in order to remain @home, providing all the childcare, then I see this as a disadvantage rather than an actual “perk.”
Leaving the work force does not bode well for anyone.
Doing so leaves a gap on your resume + it is not easy later on when you re-enter.
Plus daily childcare is a lot more work than working outside of the home.
Caring for little ones is a ton of mental/physical energy which can be very taxing on anyone.
Plus the loss of personal satisfaction along w/the isolated lifestyle may not be for everyone.
That being said, I do acknowledge that each + every situation will be completely different.
Anonymous wrote:I can understand that not working could be a marital perk if the marriage does not produce offspring.
However if one spouse quits his/her career in order to remain @home, providing all the childcare, then I see this as a disadvantage rather than an actual “perk.”
Leaving the work force does not bode well for anyone.
Doing so leaves a gap on your resume + it is not easy later on when you re-enter.
Plus daily childcare is a lot more work than working outside of the home.
Caring for little ones is a ton of mental/physical energy which can be very taxing on anyone.
Plus the loss of personal satisfaction along w/the isolated lifestyle may not be for everyone.
That being said, I do acknowledge that each + every situation will be completely different.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Regardless of her education, she will need to get a job. To “not work” is a perk of marriage that goes away when the marriage ends.
Even if she hasn’t worked for 30 years and has kids at home? That seems like precedent.