Anonymous wrote:Everyone knows that Jon Stewart is an egotistical jerk. He's the guy who thinks he's always the smartest person in the room. And he's the guy who defends bros before hoes.

I suspect Stewart has his own skeletons in the closet. He's certainly not as clean cut as Colbert. Not a chance.

+1

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When is the recording from?

Last year

Last Year he could safely say something like this about another male star.

This year he can't.

Thank Trump.

His election gave women a very loud voice.

Silver linings.

Also, thank no longer having to defend Bill Clinton. Now that he's completely irrelevant, there's no reason to hold back.

Everyone knows that Jon Stewart is an egotistical jerk. He's the guy who thinks he's always the smartest person in the room. And he's the guy who defends bros before hoes.

I suspect Stewart has his own skeletons in the closet. He's certainly not as clean cut as Colbert. Not a chance.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Add to the existing thread.

I'm not talking about Louis CK- that's irrelevant. I'm talking about Jon Stewart who I watched for years

Yes you are talking about Louis CK. Add to existing thread and stop trolling.

No, this thread is about Jon Stewart. Not trolling (why would someone "troll" on this incredibly serious topic?), and I'm not sure you know what the word means.

Trolling means to be deliberately provocative. Jon Stewart said, "I didn't know about the sexual assault but it's important..."

So yes, you are trolling by putting up a purposefully misleading title to your thread.

So no, I'm not being deliberately provocative by pointing out his statement which many, many people found objectionable.

He dismissed the sexual assaults out of hand. Even after they had emerged and when confronted.

You seriously need to recalibrate your compass of what you get outraged about.

m

Where was it exactly that he dismissed anything out of hand? He didn't.

Conservatives despise Jon Stewart, so this seems more like an effort to tarnish him by association. Trolls prey on people's emotions and try to start arguments. You need to calibrate your language and actually base things on fact. What you are doing is making a false accusation about someone over the internet. This isn't proof of anything.

So you're basing your arguments off of your political beliefs and loyalty to Jon Stewart. Guess what? I'm liberal too. That does not excuse his behaviors.

And really- look up the definition of troll. Not everyone who posts something you dont like is a "troll". Get some perspective. You seem like a troll yourself.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Add to the existing thread.

I'm not talking about Louis CK- that's irrelevant. I'm talking about Jon Stewart who I watched for years

Yes you are talking about Louis CK. Add to existing thread and stop trolling.

No, this thread is about Jon Stewart. Not trolling (why would someone "troll" on this incredibly serious topic?), and I'm not sure you know what the word means.

Trolling means to be deliberately provocative. Jon Stewart said, "I didn't know about the sexual assault but it's important..."

So yes, you are trolling by putting up a purposefully misleading title to your thread.

So no, I'm not being deliberately provocative by pointing out his statement which many, many people found objectionable.

He dismissed the sexual assaults out of hand. Even after they had emerged and when confronted.

You seriously need to recalibrate your compass of what you get outraged about.

m

Where was it exactly that he dismissed anything out of hand? He didn't.

Conservatives despise Jon Stewart, so this seems more like an effort to tarnish him by association. Trolls prey on people's emotions and try to start arguments. You need to calibrate your language and actually base things on fact. What you are doing is making a false accusation about someone over the internet. This isn't proof of anything.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Add to the existing thread.

I'm not talking about Louis CK- that's irrelevant. I'm talking about Jon Stewart who I watched for years

Yes you are talking about Louis CK. Add to existing thread and stop trolling.

No, this thread is about Jon Stewart. Not trolling (why would someone "troll" on this incredibly serious topic?), and I'm not sure you know what the word means.

Trolling means to be deliberately provocative. Jon Stewart said, "I didn't know about the sexual assault but it's important..."

So yes, you are trolling by putting up a purposefully misleading title to your thread.

So no, I'm not being deliberately provocative by pointing out his statement which many, many people found objectionable.

He dismissed the sexual assaults out of hand. Even after they had emerged and when confronted.

You seriously need to recalibrate your compass of what you get outraged about.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Add to the existing thread.

I'm not talking about Louis CK- that's irrelevant. I'm talking about Jon Stewart who I watched for years

Yes you are talking about Louis CK. Add to existing thread and stop trolling.

No, this thread is about Jon Stewart. Not trolling (why would someone "troll" on this incredibly serious topic?), and I'm not sure you know what the word means.

Trolling means to be deliberately provocative. Jon Stewart said, "I didn't know about the sexual assault but it's important..."

So yes, you are trolling by putting up a purposefully misleading title to your thread.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He didn't defend him.

No, he dismissed sexual abuse allegations and said they were basically irrelevant.

No he didn't. A gawker article and tweets don't mean much. He indicated there wasn't a discussion of these specific references.

Actually they mean a whole lot, as the NYT article proved today. It was an open secret within the comedy community as Tig Notaro discussed

Hindsight is 20/20.

I'm not defending CK.

This was in 2016. Stewart wasn't dismissing the abuse allegations. He said he didn't discuss this on his show in conjunction with CK's appearance on the daily show in 2015 and that he hadn't heard Jen kirkman's podcast, didn't see the tweets or the gawker article. Gawker posted about ck in 2012. Kirkman's podcast was in 2015 and she later deleted it:
http://flavorwire.com/533257/jen-kirkman-clarifies-comments-that-may-or-may-not-have-been-about-louis-c-k

Stewart was saying that he had been out of the world of stand up for a while. He hosted the daily show from 1999-2015. To write for that show his media diet was CNN, Fox News etc. so I believe him when he said he wasn't aware of it.

Remember he defended Anthony weiner when his pix were released b/c they knew each other quite well. He did not pull any punches on his show when it was quickly revealed that weiner was not hacked and was sending these photos.

So yes, Ck is a scum bag, but he also seems to be a cagey scum bag. Amy poheler raves about him too. My guess is that where, when, and who he sexually harassed women was calculated.

I? Love Jon Stewart but watching that clip now it’s cringeworthy. I? hope he apologizes for it.

Anonymous wrote:HBO has announced that Louis will not perform at Night of Too Many Stars - that is Jon Stewart’s baby.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/09/arts/louis-ck-is-cut-from-hbo-special-night-of-too-many-stars.html

Good! I hate all this stuff going on.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Add to the existing thread.

I'm not talking about Louis CK- that's irrelevant. I'm talking about Jon Stewart who I watched for years

Yes you are talking about Louis CK. Add to existing thread and stop trolling.

NP here. Are you related to Louis? Employed by him?

ARE you him?? (Hope not; he's a disgusting pig!)

Anonymous wrote:HBO has announced that Louis will not perform at Night of Too Many Stars - that is Jon Stewart’s baby.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/09/arts/louis-ck-is-cut-from-hbo-special-night-of-too-many-stars.html

Stewart is not mentioned in the entire article. Even if it was "his baby" at this point there is too much public backlash for him to support Louis without loss to his career. I think his earlier comments said it much more clearly.

As Mara Wilson said, "This one was not a surprise."

HBO has announced that Louis will not perform at Night of Too Many Stars - that is Jon Stewart’s baby.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/09/arts/louis-ck-is-cut-from-hbo-special-night-of-too-many-stars.html

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Add to the existing thread.

I'm not talking about Louis CK- that's irrelevant. I'm talking about Jon Stewart who I watched for years

Yes you are talking about Louis CK. Add to existing thread and stop trolling.

No, this thread is about Jon Stewart. Not trolling (why would someone "troll" on this incredibly serious topic?), and I'm not sure you know what the word means.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Add to the existing thread.

I'm not talking about Louis CK- that's irrelevant. I'm talking about Jon Stewart who I watched for years

Yes you are talking about Louis CK. Add to existing thread and stop trolling.