Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My second grader has Spanish twice a week and had it three times a week last year.
As part of the deal of getting rid of half day Mondays, FLES was supposed to be rolled out at all schools, instead of only the some that already had it.
This was not part of the deal. Full day Mondays was an increase in cost. If anything, FLES should have been reduced to offset the cost of the longer schedule.
It makes up for, in part, the loss of planning time. You are thinking like a taxpayer instead of a school administrator or teacher.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wolftrap has Chinese starting in 1st grade. My children both liked it in first and then didn’t afterwards. It is mandatory. Spanish or extra recess would be more beneficial.
All the kids I know from Wolftrap hate the Chinese, unfortunately, though I haven't exactly understood why. Spanish would be easier for most parents to support at home, not to mention more useful, but there seems to be no rhyme nor reason in how FCPS allocated FLES languages across schools.
FCPS now has another program for after-school foreign language instruction in elementary (GLOBAL PLUS), but the school has to apply to the program. There is also additional cost but it is cheaper than a vendor-led program, and many schools have already enrolled.
https://www.fcps.edu/academics/global-plus
Anonymous wrote:My kid had it 2x week at his center elementary school and I felt it was a waste of time and only there to .ake the school look good.
Taking Spanish for 40 minutes 2x week is basically worthless.
Anonymous wrote:Has FCPS dropped foreign languages from all elementary schools or just certain schools? I'm aware of the immersion program but we sadly were not selected in the lottery. When does language instruction pick up?
Anonymous wrote:Wolftrap has Chinese starting in 1st grade. My children both liked it in first and then didn’t afterwards. It is mandatory. Spanish or extra recess would be more beneficial.
Anonymous wrote:Shrevewood does Chinese. Waste of time. I wish it was Spanish.
Anonymous wrote:FLES is not effective. It does give the classroom teachers additional planning time, but an extra recess monitored by aides would be more valuable for the students.
Kids are not going to learn a language with FLES. It is an expensive "nice to have."
Anonymous wrote:FLES is not effective. It does give the classroom teachers additional planning time, but an extra recess monitored by aides would be more valuable for the students.
Kids are not going to learn a language with FLES. It is an expensive "nice to have."