Anonymous wrote:If money really controlled elections, Clinton would be president. She had way more money than the winner.
Same in the recent special elections
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What we really need is to get the money out of politics. Then a lot of this other bullshit will start to sort itself out.
Bye-bye Mercers and Kochs.
That would be such a good thing. But we've got Gorsuch on the SCOTUS, so the wait will be long. We're an oligarchy now, no longer a democracy.
Anonymous wrote:What we really need is to get the money out of politics. Then a lot of this other bullshit will start to sort itself out.
Anonymous wrote:If money really controlled elections, Clinton would be president. She had way more money than the winner.
Same in the recent special elections
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Democrats are basically moderate.
The GOP could just clean house, reinstate the Fairness Doctrine, pass campaign finance reform, and end their gerrymandering.
Umm, no, not quite, no way.
I've always voted Democratic, but am a Marylander who voted for Hogan because I felt he was more moderate than Anthony Brown. Will probably be voting for him again, unless the Democrats come up with someone better.
Anonymous wrote:What would it accomplish? They would be as corrupt as the other two.
Anonymous wrote:What we really need is to get the money out of politics. Then a lot of this other bullshit will start to sort itself out.
Anonymous wrote:If money really controlled elections, Clinton would be president. She had way more money than the winner.
Same in the recent special elections